Who gives a damn what liberals “deem racist”?

‘FRENCH Interior Minister Claude Gueant, a hardliner close to President Nicolas Sarkozy, came under fire today for the second time in a month for comments deemed racist by liberals.
At a meeting late Friday in support of Sarkozy’s bid for a new term as president, Gueant condemned proposals by the president’s socialist opponent Francois Hollande to give the vote in local elections to immigrants.
“We don’t want foreign town councillors making halal food obligatory in canteen meals …. or regulating mixed bathing in swimming pools,” Gueant told an audience near Nancy in eastern France…’
Good for him. And what the pack of lying, traitorous enablers of the islamist conquest and cultural genocide say ought to be regarded as public obscenity.  They should be flogged for it and in a sane world they would be.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Who gives a damn what liberals “deem racist”?

  1. KG says:

    Instead of the “French minister under fire for ‘racist’ remarks ” headline, why not ‘Free Speech Under Attack in France’?
    There was no argument based on factual disagreement, as usual, just the reflexive all-purpose (and inaccurate) use of the weapon that’s served the left so well. Dutifully repeated by the propagandists.
    Breitbart was right–the media is the Enemy. Fix that first and the rest is easy.

  2. KG says:

    And of course, the media is silent on this. Not racist, you see……
    ‘Abu Baseer, is a London based spiritual adviser to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation. He had this to say about Islamic immigration to the West. Quote:

    “One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.”

    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/transforming-britain-into-lebanon.html#more

  3. octagongrappler says:

    Those comments from the French Minister are spot on, And i Have 2 french friends who say that at ground level french people have had enough but the media in France wont allow sarkozy to get re-elected :|

    • To be honest Sarko isn’t exactly the Conservative we hoped for, but then again this is france, so maybe over there he’s like a right wing theocrat or something. :)

      Here’s to hoping the french people decide to tell their media – you don’t own this country and we’ll decide who runs it. I’m still patiently waiting for us Aussies to shove the same message down the collective throats of our media elites and the Australian labor party.

  4. KG says:

    The facts have become utterly irrelevant haven’t they, Grappler?
    And we’re supposed to mourn when journalists get themselves killed… :twisted:

  5. Darin says:

    The leftists are always Deeming things just read the list
    Deeming who or what is racist
    Deeming new ‘rights’ into existence
    Deeming who is rich and who is poor
    Deeming who pays higher taxes
    Deeming what insurance covers
    Deeming who gets health care
    and worst of all
    Deeming who is human and who is not
    That’s why we on the right must smash them between the eyes with the truth every chance we get.
    Well the truth or a brick which ever is handy at the time.

  6. mara says:

    The chances of my going to a koffee-klatch to hear other peoples’ kids mauling, puking and rioting are vanishingly small but even if I did I’d be completely out of sync with the sort of women who would allow this banning of coffee to occur. I’d be the biggest troublemaker they ever had. Sad though that these weak, easily indoctrinated women are raising the next generation.

  7. KG says:

    “Sad though that these weak, easily indoctrinated women are raising the next generation.”
    Yep–the uninformed are raising the unspeakable.

  8. Kris K says:

    From your link above, KG:

    http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/transforming-britain-into-lebanon.html#more

    If we look at the population of Great Britain under the age of 40 it is as follows:

    Indigenous Population 2012: 25.5 million
    Non-Indigenous Population 2012: 6.75 million

    If we project the figures for those aged under 40 forward to 2030, taking into account our declining population and the expanding Muslim demographic — and 2030 is just 18 years from now – we find ourselves facing a catastrophe:

    Indigenous Population 2030: 19 million
    Non-Indigenous Population 2030: 13.5 million

    But it gets worse again. On top of this we need to take into account that some 250,000 native Brits sick to death of the state of multicultural Britain emigrate every year, and if third world immigration continues as it is, the figures will be as follows:

    Indigenous Population 2030: 15 million
    Non-Indigenous Population 2030: 23.5 million

    And then from another link Spidy provided the other day:

    http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/about-massey/news/article.cfm?mnarticle_uuid=65FC4CE3-96BF-57FE-A80B-B28A806A0D14

    “… 40 per cent of Auckland’s 1.4 million residents were born overseas.”

    So how far away are we in New Zealand [or Australia for that matter] from having a similar disaster as in the UK? And how many of our recent immigrant numbers are in fact Muslim? Is there any doubt that there is a global agenda by the Marxist left to essentially make white and [long-term] native-born residents of Western nations a minority in their own country?

    I’ll say it again, “… 40 per cent of Auckland’s 1.4 million residents were born overseas.”

    • octagongrappler says:
      • Kris K says:

        Arghhh – my eyes burn.
        If I’d known he was going to be in Wellington I might have arranged my own little ‘awards ceremony’ for him.

        • octagongrappler says:

          OH YES and the society seems to take a “moral” position on what is said in the media and whats considered appropriate argggggggggggggg………

          He looks like a complete tosser as well.

          • octagongrappler says:

            http://www.nzcpr.com/guest169.htm

            THIS IS AN AWSOME PIECE :lol:

            • Kris K says:

              Thanks, Spidy – well worth a read.
              I trust John Key will take on board Dr Greg Clydesdale’s recommendations [pass me another Tui].

              • octagongrappler says:

                Does that mean if more white boys and asians are put in the all blacks we will be better? Its such a strange argument lol.

                Oh Kris i can send you a 6 pack of double brown :cool:

            • The Gantt Guy says:

              Yes it is, Spidy. He zeroes in on just two of the more egregious examples of taxpayer largesse being wasted.

              I’ve been banging on for a while now about a rescue plan for New Zealand, and although I’m not an economist, sociologist (thank God), social engineer or other type of do-gooder, I do credit myself with a reasonable amount of common sense (which appears to be surprisingly uncommon these days, but I digress). One of the key aspects of my Rescue Plan is that the government should not be funding organisations whose role is to lobby government. Especially where that lobbying is undertaken on behalf of a particular constituency. Anyway, a quick sweep through the NZ Government website has elicited a list of 465 agencies, of which 70 appear to have a role solely or largely revolving around lobbying the government on behalf of a constituency.

              That list is here.

              So let’s shut ’em down. Now, I’m going to publish my first draft Rescue Plan here tomorrow, and will be looking for feedback, but this discussion has pre-empted at least one element of it. But of course we’re not animals (just baby-eating Conservatives). We won’t close them all down next Monday. What I propose is to baseline their 2011/12 budgets, and reduce them by 20% per annum over the next 5 years, so that at the end of 5 years the amount of taxpayer funding going to these entities is $0. In the meantime, their Chief Executives can go speak to the constituencies on whose behalf they lobby (or anyone else, for that matter) and invite them to contribute to the cause. If they can’t find external funding then too bad, they shut down. If they can, good on ’em. I think that’s called “the free market”.

              Anyways, more on this tomorrow.

              • The Gantt Guy says:

                I hope you can see that PDF I uploaded. If not, I’ll load it up again tomorrow.

  9. “for us all civilisations are not of equal value.”
    “Those which defend humanity seem to us to be more advanced than those that do not,”

    Seems rather straight forward to me, but then i’m no stupid leftie who blindly swallows anything dished out by my masters.

    “Gueant has repeatedly linked immigration with crime in France and in January claimed the delinquency rate among immigrants was “two to three times higher” than the national average.”

    Is he wrong, can his opponents produce some facts stating otherwise. I’m sure they would have if they could, but it’s far easier to just dismiss him as some sort of racist. Saves you the trouble of pulling your head out of your ass and rising above the level of an intellectual pygmy, i guess.