“the biggest federal land grab in American history”

‘..What exactly, we should ask, is a National Blueway? In short, it’s the focus of the biggest federal land grab in American history.
Physically, a National Blueway is an entire watershed, including its municipal, county and tribal governments, private property, businesses and everything else within the ridge line of the watershed. Consider the first Blueway, the 410-mile Connecticut River, along with its 7.2 million-acre watershed, which stretches into Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont. It wouldn’t take too many grabs like that for the federal government to control all the water in the nation…’
And it gets worseMuch worse

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to “the biggest federal land grab in American history”

  1. Ronbo says:

    @KG:

    I hope the people behind this shit like this understand their names are marked down as TRAITORS in the patriot black book of termination with extreme prejudice in case of civil war. :evil:

    So many psychopaths, communists, fascists, traitors and criminal subhumans infest the Great Republic…

    …AND SO BLOODY FEW BULLETS LEFT IN THE GUN STORES! :mrgreen:

    I love this video: http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-pro-second-amendment-advertisement.html

  2. KG says:

    Take a look, Ronbo:
    ‘I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.’
    …So be it. Let them come. My, and your, unalienable rights are not up for a vote, nor subject to popular approval, nor dependent for their existence on cooked polls, phony numbers, or Imperial indulgence, and liberal-fascists will take no more of them without a fight–a real, not just rhetorical, one. They are indeed emboldened, and they think any “stroke of the pen, law of the land” edict their Golden Manchild can conceive of will just be blindly obeyed as if it were holy writ. They are very much mistaken.
    Molon labe, motherfuckers.
    Update! Via Jeff and the DC, here’s the list of guns they’ll be taking from you, or forcing you to turn in under threat of being tossed into an O!gulag. Lock and load, people. No quarter to the fascist sons of bitches. And no surrender, either. Be assured: they are coming, and they will not stop. They will have to BE stopped, and that’s the sad truth.’
    http://coldfury.com/2013/01/24/full-court-press/

  3. KG says:

    Yeah, Obumma really said this:
    “…preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action.”

    The only “collective action” I can think of which will preserve individual freedoms is for the people rise up and hang every fucking politician and strangle every damn bureaucrat.
    That’s “collective action” I’d approve of.

    • Ronbo says:

      @KG:

      I’m wondering if Obama is reading my fiction…

      SERIOUSLY! :twisted:

      Because he is doing things today I wrote that a fictional president bent on the imposing totalitarian rule would do back in 2009, when I published the first draft of a novel “CHECKMATE” to which I added more material in 2011.

      Yes, the attempt to put “political” generals in charge of the Pentagon, the great gun grab, political assassinations by Right and Left, censorship, the formation of elite storm troopers, concentration camps, martial law, etc. – all done by a communist/fascist style president that results in revolution/civil war.

      My incomplete and first draft novel here:

      http://checkmate-ronbo.blogspot.com/

      The wild card is the U.S. military in the (what looks like) Second U.S. Civil War.

      If the military supports the traitor side in mass – the patriot side could be involved rather quickly in a very bloody and long conflict like that which happened in Russia during 1905, when the Imperial Army stayed loyal to government and shot down the rebels in the streets of Moscow. At that point, the Russian rebel movement went underground and became more radical. When the next act in the revolutionary drama took place in 1917, the Imperial Army dissolved and either went home or joined the Reds or the White Army.

      If on the other hand, a cabal of patriot office INSIDE the Pentagon bump off the Leftist political officers and seize the military machine, then it would turned the traitors in Washington, D.C. in a blitz coup were loss of life who be at a minimum and confined to one small section of the country.

      In my novel under “General Conway” (modeled very loosely on Oliver Cromwell) the Armed Forces (along with militias) pull a coup against the Washington government, which they overthrow, and impose the “Commonwealth” (an oligarchy of veteran troops) with “Conway” as the “First Citizen” of strict military rule due to end in ten years with return to the U.S. Constitution.

      • Darin says:

        Well now that women can fight on the front lines it seems removing the balls from the military is nearly complete.

        I wonder when the new “flexibility” will eliminate our nuclear deterrent?

  4. Darin says:

    Link doesn’t work for me,but yes the feds have been on a land grab for decades and it’s increasing.Those watershed basins also include about 60% of our farmland IIRC.

  5. KG says:

    Link fixed. :oops:

  6. Darin says:

    I think we may see the return of Statehood in the US shortly.

  7. Flashman says:

    The relative willingness of a State’s soldiers to accept blanket orders to fire on civilians when the troops in question are not authorised to do so by a genuinely independent member of judiciary is, I believe, proof of a society experiencing fundamental political stress. Indeed I consider it evidence of taking a long and incalculably dangerous step towards civil war.

    A further keynote indicator is the existence [or passage of] laws exonerating soldiers from criminal and civil liability for their actions.

  8. Yup-posted on this Tues..w/ links to other ‘activity’ in our military–
    Tried to warn everyone—
    noticed it in the academies- a few years ago—
    http://carolmsblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/bho-only-wnats-military-leaders-who.html
    C-CS

  9. Robertvdl says:

    Tina Turner becoming Swiss citizen

    “I think anytime a person, whether they’re world-renowned or the most meek and mild, makes the decision to change their citizenship we need to step back and think what causes that decision,”

    Ya What could it be ? The color of her skin ?http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_scratch.gif

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/01/25/tina-turner-becoming-swiss-citizen-giving-up-us-passport/?intcmp=features#ixzz2J1WIm3AW

    • KG says:

      The article doesn’t actually give a reason, Robert. Which seems odd.

      • Ronbo says:

        @KG:

        The stats say THOUSANDS of wealthy and middle class Americans are running overseas to low tax havens – some even to RUSSIA – and many of them denouncing their American citizenship.

        In fact, it’s getting so common that it’s called, “Going Galt” in reference to Ayn Rand’s protagonist in Atlas Shrugged, a genius scientist and inventor, who disappears when a socialist government takes control of America, and encourages other productive men and women to do the same.

        So I would imagine Turner is quite wealthy and wants to save her assets from the Obama Regime, and I’m not surprised the article would ignore this important reason for her defection to the Swiss.

        Also, she married a foreigner, and like a loyal wife she is standing by her man in his part of the world, which is not unusual. My late wife Gisela gave up her German citizenship when she married me and became a LEGAL American citizen after a five year battle royal with our federal immigration people.

  10. KG says:

    Well, Ronbo, if that’s her reason (protecting her wealth) then good for her.
    I’ve long held that until the productive refuse to subsidise and support the unproductive, nothing will change.
    The post I just put up about the “new aristocracy” is a stark illustration of how the productive are being fleeced and the fruits of their labour (and years of their lives spent accumulating those fruits) are being stolen from them in order to fund a parasite class. :evil:
    Fuck them..the General’s comment above should apply equally to domestic enemies of America.

  11. Yokel says:

    Over the weekend, I listened to the first hour of Alex Jones’ Friday radio show. He seemed to think that lands could be being cleared of people, as well as the people being disarmed, so that the Chinese could have it as “security” for the loans that they have been making to prop up the American Way of Welfare (which has suddenly become far too much like the European Way!)

    Not sure I agree, but provokes an interesting thought or two.