A gutless society.

The problem:
‘NURSES are arming themselves with makeshift weapons for protection while walking to and from work at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital. They are carrying scissors, hairspray cans and whistles as they walk alone through the Parklands to their homes and cars, following four sexual assaults in North Adelaide in the past two years…’
The police response:
‘Superintendent Anthony Fioravanti said police did not encourage people carrying personal weapons. “Carrying an item expressly for the purpose of self-protection may lead to a person being charged,” he said…’
If police fail in their primary duty – fail to serve and protect – then people have every right to take whatever measures are necessary to protect themselves. My message to the bureaucop and his masters is a simple “fuck you“. You may quote law and statistics all you like, but you have no moral right whatsoever to threaten people for simply defending themselves.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to A gutless society.

  1. Pascal says:

    Well, it appears that those in charge of the West nowadays have an “For us to live we must let you die” moral code, so your statement about their moral right leaves them bewildered.

    Something has to give….

    • KG says:

      It sure does.
      The lowliest sea-urchin is able to protect itself with its spines, yet we, the supposed pinnacle of creation, are prevented from doing so by our lords and masters.
      We really are serfs, in almost every way that matters.

  2. Flashman says:

    One of the great myths is that mr plod has an obligation to “serve and protect” members of the general public.

    In reality, he’s simply a social janitor who operates reactively to clean up or bury the mess on an after the fact basis [when he’s not preoccupied with zealously bending to the will and orders of his political masters].

    In the present instance, mr plod shows his true colours by threatening the people who are, according to the myth, under his protection.

    • Phil Stephenson says:

      Flashman, most superintendents are not what you could call “working cops” and should not be confused with or seen in the same light as front line officers. As far as I’m concerned, this “Superintendent Anthony Fioravanti” is a disgrace to his uniform.

  3. Oswald Bastable says:

    Let’s see if they post my reply :mrgreen:

  4. D.T. says:

    We had a Ute stolen a few days ago and the local police were informed as to whom stole it and where it was . We were then informed by the local police that they couldn’t do anything as it was a civil matter. WTF? We told them that if they wouldn’t do anything then we would go to the property and take the Ute back but they then told us that we would be charged with ‘trespass’ . WTF? We asked if they acompany one to the property ( because the thieves have guns ) and the cops declined and told us ‘ if any trouble starts then get a safe distance from the property’ .WTF? In the end we worked it all out without the help from police. So can anyone tell me why the NSW Police Force exists beside sitting in a vehicle eating donuts taking pictures of speeding cars?
    D.T.

  5. Darin says:

    Most police being men I,would say that the same demonization that has been applied to men in general by the left carries over to Policemen as well.It stems from a rebellion against authority.

    We can’t allow Policemen as well as any other men to “man up” and protect the weak in society,heavens no,some poor criminal might get hurt :roll: :evil:

    • Ronbo says:

      The solution is quite simple – buy a gun on the black market and carry it every where and FUCK THE LAW :!:

      Like Charles Dickens wisely said, “THE LAW IS AN ASS :!: :!: :!: