Lying, ungrateful prick.

Posted on July 21, 2013 by KG

“Pain of racial past”
‘…Obama spoke emotionally about the subconscious racial profiling that blacks, especially young black men, continue to suffer, telling reporters and cable television networks that carried the speech live that he could have been Trayvon Martin 35 years ago. He spoke of his experience earlier in life of being followed by department store security agents when shopping, and of hearing drivers click door locks as they drove by him on the street…’ (!! Add that to the list of lies.)
This, from an asshole who had his way paid through an elite college and still had the funds to smoke dope and take a trip to Africa as a student. From a person who was given a dream run to the Presidency, courtesy of being a half-black bastard child, who never published anything of substance as the editor of the Harvard Law Review yet still claims to be a Constitutional law expert. A person who lives a life of wealth and privilege courtesy of the taxpayers of America, a country he has nothing but contempt for.
I’ve seen more wholesome things being pecked at by crows.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Lying, ungrateful prick.

  1. Flashman says:
    July 21, 2013 at 10:19

    …or go down the lavatory pan.

  2. dondiego says:
    July 21, 2013 at 11:05

    Neither he nor the DOJ mulatto have ANY claim to a history of ‘scrimminashun. Both caramel half-breeds take their dark roots from outside of the USA.

    I hope his lies wake real Americans up, however there was still a large number of real Americans who voted for the creep twice[ :?: :!: ]

    • dondiego says:
      July 21, 2013 at 11:14

      Perhaps I should clarify: I don’t consider pollies making things up (or spinning statistically proven-correct assumptions) as real citizens. Either Barry or the lying mixed-race thieves/maoristocracy who disparage and belittle my (again, proven greater) culture.

  3. KG says:
    July 21, 2013 at 11:09

    “..there was still a large number of real Americans who voted for the creep twice”
    I don’t regard welfare leeches as “real Americans” dondiego.

  4. Moneo says:
    July 21, 2013 at 12:05

    Pat Buchanan noted in his book “Will America survive to 2025?” that McCain would have won handily in 08 if the demographics were the same as they were in 68 – something like 65-35, as nearly two thirds of whites voted for him.

    • Pascal says:
      July 21, 2013 at 14:23

      Horse pucky. McCain would have found some additional ways to take his dive. Unlike McQueeg, even professional wrestlers make an effort to give the impression their trying to win.

  5. john says:
    July 21, 2013 at 19:02

    Right, Pascal. As they say, “the blame for lame falls mainly on McCain.”

      • Darin says:
        July 21, 2013 at 21:41

        Would McCain have been any better?Is the question and the answer is a firm no.There simply wasn’t anyone to vote for as the media was allowed to pick the Republican candidate same as they are doing with Crispy now.
        At least we dodged the bullet in 08′ with Bush.Can anyone really imagine the damage Gore would have done :shock:

  6. Darin says:
    July 21, 2013 at 21:45

    When zero talked about the door locks and purse clutching the first thing I thought of was well if young black males were not responsible for 80% of the robberies,rapes and murders and most of their victims were not white,things might be different.

  7. GW says:
    July 22, 2013 at 01:20

    This was a three-fer from O. One, it was to condemn racial profiling as unreasonable. Two, it was to undergird the racial grievance industry, who’s bete noir is racial profiling. And lastly, given as this was in a speech remarking on the Zimmerman verdict, it was to tell the nation that, irrespective of the jury verdict, Zimmerman in fact racially profiled Martin.

    But racial profiling is itself not unreasonable. Race hustler Jesse Jackson famously said that when he is out at night on a dark street and hears people behind him, he breathes a sigh of relief when he turns around and sees they are white. The crime rate among young black man is astronomical. In 2011, blacks made up 13% of the population. Yet according to FBI Crime Statistics, in not a single category of crime – with the exception of DUI – was the number of total criminal incidents committed by blacks equal to or below their proportionate representation in society. In 2011, blacks in the U.S. were responsible for 49.7% of all murders, 55.6% of all robberies, 32.9% of all forcible rapes, and 33.9% of all aggravated assaults. Most of their victims were black. So if the appearance of a black person you don’t know puts you on your guard, that is not paranoia, it is acting rationally. Just ask Jesse.

    Or you can compare the crime rates of NYC, which now has a very aggressive stop and frisk policy that is based on racial profiling as the grievance industry defines that term, with Chicago. NYC has had an 80% reduction in crime over the past few years. Though 3x the size of Chicago, the actual number of murders is less than that of Chicago. Actually, stats show that, if you are black, it is safer to be a soldier in Afghanistan than it is to live in Chicago.

    But the grievance industry does all it can to conflate racial profiling with actual racism, as if black criminality was caused by, rather than the cause of, such profiling. Understand that the grievance industry – and indeed the entire far left in the west – are wholly founded on pigeon holed victim groups who would not be in such a state where it not for rampant white racism. They have to maintain that fiction or they fall apart. To admit that they are responsible for their plight and their dysfunctional culture in post racial America would be suicide for their movement. It has all reached its apex with the Zimmerman trial, and Obama – the great divider – just said to the racial grievance industry, “right on, bros.”

    But the immediate problem for the race grievance industry, who are going all out in the Zimmerman case as a chance to revive their flagging narratives, is that the Zimmerman case just does not support any of their narratives once you dig into the facts. The mixed race and less-white-than-Obama Zimmerman was the paragon of post racialism. The guy really was color blind. Now you can just look at the fact that he keyed on Trayvon Martin that night and assume with a wink and a nod that even if he didn’t start off with mentioning Martin’s race to the police in his 911 call, that he first keyed on Martin just because he was black.

    But when you step back and look at all of Zimmerman’s phone calls to the police over three years in his capacity as neighborhood watch, even the suggestion of profiling seems to fall by the wayside. If you review the call log to police in incidents where race was mentioned:

    – Zimmerman called police on three occasions to report people identified as black acting suspiciously, one of whom was Trayvon.

    – Zimmerman called police twice when he noticed a man who fit the description of a person wanted for burglary. The man happened to be black – and indeed, the burgler in question.

    – Zimmerman called police out of “concern for the safety” of a seven year old black child wandering unsupervised in the road.

    – Zimmerman called police five times to report suspicious activity by whites and hispanics.

    The one thing that gives me some hope here is that, while the media has the microphone stuck solely into the mouths of the grievance industry hustlers, from Obama to the CBC, the NAACP and Al Sharpton, even a lot of blacks are shaking their heads on this. Sharpton’s 100 city rally yesterday drew a crowd of “hundreds” in most of the cities, and double digits in many. And there are other indicators that maybe blacks, at least those not caught in the lowest 25%, are catching on. They need to, because the path Obama and Sharpton would lead them on is only good for Obama and Sharpton. The people it most hurts are the blacks that follow them.

  8. KG says:
    July 22, 2013 at 05:51

    Thanks very much for the comment, GW. It’s the best thing I’ve read on the subject thus far–and the most hopeful.

    Perhaps if there’s mass unrest on the part of Americans, it will be aimed where it belongs, at Big Government and its bureaucrat kapos. Like the Sharptons, race tensions suit those two very well, if only as distractions.
    Rioting in Miami sure would drive Benghazi and every other scandal off the airwaves…..
    More coffee. Need more coffee, brain dead.

  9. Pascal says:
    July 22, 2013 at 06:50

    “Rioting in Miami sure would drive Benghazi and every other scandal off the airwaves…..”

    Oh, wait…

    20130720-194438.jpg alt=”20130720-194438.jpg”>

    In case that image fails to embed, here’s the link.

  10. KG says:
    July 22, 2013 at 07:04

    :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Brilliant!