Sarah Palin 2016

A few more reasons why-

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/12/american_achiever_of_2014__sarah_palin.html

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Sarah Palin 2016

  1. Ronbo says:

    I agree…I’ve been a Palin supporter since 2008 and watched her grow in statesmanship on an almost daily basis in the last six years.

    If she were to be elected president in 2016, she would be called the American Iron Lady in no time flat, as Palin would hit the decks running with stalwart Republican solutions to our many domestic and foreign policy meltdowns caused by the Obama Regime.

    Personally, I think Sarah Palin has earned the presidency on the basis of the holocaust of personal insults made by the loony Left against her, and her family that is now over six years of shit storm.

    In fact, this harsh and undeserved Leftist hurricane of hate has made her an “Iron Lady” already, who has not backed down one inch on her support for the U.S. Constitution.

    • Darin says:

      Yes,you can always tell the ones the left fears most by how vicious they attack and Palin has been attacked more than any other.I am impressed by the way she takes it all in stride and usually turns the tables on them.

      I think she could be just the one to dump some much needed chlorine in our scum infested political pool.

      Speaking of which,have you seen this?
      http://www.draftgowdy.com/

  2. KG says:

    And then there’s this:
    new CNN/ORC poll finds former Florida Governor Jeb Bush with a 10-point lead over New Jersey Governor Chris Christie and a 16-point advantage over Dr. Ben Carson among CNN’s sample of 453 individuals who it dubbed Republicans.

    I frankly don’t trust this “poll” an inch. :evil:

    • Ronbo says:

      Ditto :!:

      I cannot believe Drudge is putting shit like a CNN poll on his website :!:

      As is well known, the Leftist Lamestream Media uses “polls” to write biased “news articles” to support the Progressive (communist) agenda (spit!)

      Do they think the country class is stupid :?:

      We do not believe ANYTHING the Leftard if the source is ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, and especially MSNBC :!:

      We are on to their dirty little game and Drudge better keep shit like that off his website, or we will find other sources of real information :!:

      • Darin says:

        It’s CNN,the poll obviously can’t be trusted.However neither can any Fox news poll because they still have Rove on the staff.

        We the People haven’t been able to pick our own nominees for the last 10 presidential election cycles.We have only been allowed to pick the lesser of two weasels in the general election as in the case of Bush -v- Gore.

  3. The Gantt Guy says:

    I don’t think Palin will run. She’s having stunning success picking the next generation of Republican leaders to transform the party; she has success Karl Rove would have wet dreams out.

    As for the CNN poll, it was 453 people FFS. Clearly, the Bush machine is trying to get out in front and get the meme of “inevitable” sewn up. Hell, at the moment it’s a one-horse race – nobody else has even confirmed they’re running.

  4. Oswald Bastable says:

    She had better run and win- I named a future aircraft carrier after her! :mrgreen:

  5. Ronbo says:

    Oswald Bastable said:

    “She had better run and win- I named a future aircraft carrier after her! :mrgreen:”

    Speaking of aircraft carriers named after the famous:

    http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2009/11/uss-ronald-reagan-vs-uss-barak-obama.html

  6. Ronbo says:

    Darin said:

    It’s CNN,the poll obviously can’t be trusted.However neither can any Fox news poll because they still have Rove on the staff.

    We the People haven’t been able to pick our own nominees for the last 10 presidential election cycles.We have only been allowed to pick the lesser of two weasels in the general election as in the case of Bush -v- Gore.

    —————————————————————————-

    As I said polls cannot be trusted from most sources – and that would include Fox and The Wall Street Journal – they are often conducted to uphold a propaganda line from either the Progressive Right or the Progressive Left.

    Ditto: In fact, during there were only three presidents that were elected by We The People (Also known as the Country Class) – they were William Taft (1909 – 1913)Calvin Coolridge (1923-1929) and Ronald Reagan (1981 to 1989) all stalwart Republicans.

    What usually happens is that the Leadership Progressive Republicans (also know as RINOs, or simply as traitors) who have control of the money coming in from donations, most of which comes from true, blue constitutionalist Republicans – throw their support and the party’s money behind their favorite candidate, like Jeb Bush in this cycle – with the result the better funded establishment pick wins the Republican primary…and usually goes on to lose the general election because the Republican base voters stay home…Can you say Romney, 2012 :?:

    Of course, being good Progressive traitors, the RINO leadership, especially in the U.S. Senate, really doesn’t care as long as they control the money flow by means of committee assignments. They are happy to be in minority. They are happy Progressive living the big government dream.

    This is one good reason (FINALLY :!: ) the Country Class founded the Tea Party Movement in 2009. Yes, they wanted to block Obamacare, but they also wanted full control of the Republican Party – and this could only happen by getting rid of the RINO traitors. Thus the big battles in the primary elections, which has seen many TPM victories like Ted Cruz in the Senate and a number of fresh TPM faces in the House.

    But its sad to say the Progressive RINO faction still controls the leadership positions in both houses, and it will require several election cycles to weed out the RINOs.

    Like you I’m not on board with a long war against treason within the Republican ranks; however, the only other option would be to form a third party.

    Actually there are any number of third, fourth and fifth parties out there, who are spinning their wheels and getting no traction. Would another “Third Party” do better? I think not. The American political tradition for over 200 years has been two large parties.

    Tradition sucks, but that is the reality, Darin. :cry:

    • Pascal says:

      Let me try to bring you on board with this Ron.

      The Statist republican is not insulted by the term RINO. It conjures the image of a rhino for them: dangerous and thick-skinned. It’s easy to see that as flattering.

      Better is to brand each of them, and all the Dems with whom they have aligned, as SKUNCs.

      _Stooges and Kleptos Undermining our Nation’s Constitution_.

      They have a yellow streak down their back and they stink.

      Do you know an artist out there (your blog suggests you might) who can sketch one of these? It could become a famous icon quickly.

      • Ronbo says:

        No, both my Internet artist pals went AWOL…or maybe the Feds locked them up… These days you never know…Internet pals that you know for years just up and disappear without a word. :sad:

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      Ron, I don’t think anyone is (yet) suggesting Third Party is the way to go, although I’m watching for a big exodus of Country Class voters from the Republicrat ranks if Bush or – heaven forbid – Romney gets nominated. I think at this stage there’s just a feeling of general frustration that you’re treated like house-pets by the Republicrat leadership.

      Look at what they did to Allan West’s district just to get rid of him. Look at what Huntsman Sr said about Mike Lee just before Christmas – I’d be looking for a strong RINO challenger next time Utah is up for grabs. Look at what they had to do to get Thad Cochran back into the Senate.

      I think it’s at this point just some frustration that it’s taken (so far) 5 years to begin rooting out a disease that’s infested the Party for the past 100 years.

      But, to those thinking Third Party, I’d remind you it was thanks to Perot that America managed to elect a rapist to the Presidency.

      • Pascal says:

        Just to make this clearer than what you wrote implies Gannt.

        The polls were so strong for Perot in early July 1992 that the election was his to lose. And he did when, due to threats and cowardice, he dropped his candidacy for about 3 weeks. The problem was not the introduction of a third party, but of the wrong man.

        • Ronbo says:

          I remember that incident well :!: Perot had the election in the bag and went paranoid…Something about Bush The Elder sending the CIA after him, or his kids…Something weird and screwy like that…Then he comes back and, of course, a lot of people thought he was crazy, which he is.

          Another theory is that Perot didn’t want to win, he just wanted Bush to lose. :shock:

  7. Mathew says:

    Even if she decides to run, I doubt she’ll win, most of the leftie media despise her reflexively, lefties don’t like strong independent women you see.

    And unfortunately enough Americans are stupid enough to swallow the tripe shoveled out by their media, how else can you explain the election of the idiot currently masquerading as their president.