‘The European Civil War:

Elites vs People in a Fight for Survival
Europe is in a state of war: specifically, a civil war between the self-appointed elites who have destroyed much of the continent’s freedom, culture and prosperity and the insurgent populations they have deceived and enslaved. This is a war to the death; only one side can survive the outcome. (snip) The people of Germany, like those of many other European countries, are feeling increasingly desperate about the imposition upon them of mass immigration – an inflow that is unending and which is largely composed of Muslims who are hostile to Christianity and the indigenous culture.
….But the governments of Germany, Britain and other EU states are not simply behaving incompetently and allowing their populations to be overrun through their ineptness. On the contrary, they are actively promoting the destruction of their own societies, in the interests of globalisation and the elimination of national identities and cultures…

Merkel has mobilised all the forces at her disposal in an attempt to suppress the incipient rebellion against liberal totalitarianism. All the usual suspects have rallied to the regime: the state broadcaster, Germany’s legacy parties, the financial establishment, the churches… The Catholic Church, whose adherents are the victims of mass murder in Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Nigeria and every other country where jihadism is running rampant, switched off the lights of Cologne Cathedral to obscure the Pegida marchers who are trying to prevent a further influx of Muslims into Europe.
Turkeys voting for Christmas? Yes, because senior clerics in Germany are concerned only with trousering the massive handouts the government lavishes on registered denominations: rendering unto Caesar is the priority of organised religion in Germany. What Frau Merkel wants, she gets.
Naturally, Rentamob has organised counter-demonstrations, the ones that will be given prominence by the BBC. Violent leftists are trying to prevent the Pegida marches from spreading beyond Dresden to the rest of Germany, where polls show one German in three would like to join them. It is the Marxist and Anarchist thugs’ responsibility to prevent that, at all costs, by intimidation.
The establishment will try to laugh off the notion that such disparate elements as politicians, bankers and far leftists could be engaged in a joint enterprise – a crazed conspiracy theory, surely? Consider, then, the remarks made by Peter Sutherland, the “Father of Globalisation”, Bilderberg organiser and uber-Europhile to a House of Lords committee in 2012.
Migration, the Well-Lunched One declared, was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”. Declining populations in countries like Germany was the “key argument” for “the development of multicultural states”. He condemned Europeans “who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others. And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”
That is plain speaking. A member of the innermost elite confirms the EU’s role as undermining homogeneity. Europe, formerly the most civilised entity in the world, is to be subsumed into a globalised pool of cheap labour exploited by large corporations and regulated by bureaucrats. All distinctive culture, national identity, the Judaeo-Christian ethic and everything that contributed so greatly to human civilisation are to be expunged in favour of profit for the few and state regulation for the many.
Such soft totalitarianism might seem less frightening than Nazism or Communism, but the end product will be in every way as nightmarish. It must be defeated. Until now, the populations of Britain, Germany and other EU states have behaved like somnambulists, passively accepting the projected New Order.
The one consolation is that some people, though still only a minority, are waking up. The movements expressing their concerns – Pegida, UKIP and others – are Davids facing the Goliath of EU totalitarianism. The forces ranged against them are massive and endowed with all the resources of the state and plutocracy. Yet they are the only hope of saving the nations of Europe from cultural extinction. Their one potential strength is popular support. Will you be with them?’

From Breitbart London

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to ‘The European Civil War:

  1. dondiego says:

    Yep, it’s on. C’mon Germans- show the world that it’s not only o.k but necessary to be proud of who and what you are.

    On the subject of “… less frightening than nazism or communism”. To me it’s far more frightening. If Nazism means innovation in tech and production (I read Speer’s book, and then the book refuting it. Mate in Melb still has them both), inventing jet engines and rocket science, turning coal into tank fuel etc because every other white on the planet has ganged up on you (again) -then bring on some healthy racial fascism.

    I see a new Dark Ages dawning. Hence my support of Generation Identaire (sp?) Golden Dawn these Gerrys, whoever.

    [$0.02c worth from a mid-thirties former kiwi]

    • KG says:

      Islam represents such a huge threat because support for it comes from within our own societies, and from the sectors which are owned by the left.

  2. Jamie says:

    I don’t reckon Charles is his old man

  3. Odakyu-sen says:

    The Muslims terrorists are certainly doing everything they can to awaken Europe from her slumber. This may prove to be a fatal strategic error on their part.

  4. Lara says:

    The trouble is though this time we don’t have a Churchill or his like to challenge it, if anything quite the opposite. Was WW2 all for nothing? Cameron like Key, is a wet blanket and an appeaser. I would look to them for nothing.

  5. D.T. says:

    What are the gun laws in France and are they as stringent as ours ( Aust ) . If so then how the fuck did they get AKs ? I thought those cops were suppose to be protecting the magazine workers… were they not armed ? If they were , they were not much chop as they didn’t protect anyone…at least they didn’t kill the woman with the child.Speaking of which…she let them in the secure room…WTF. Serious government failings all the way down the ladder.And now the shit flinging begins…..
    D.T.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      D.T., bad guys will always have guns. France has a half-way decent coast line and many busy shipping ports through which guns can come in.

      And yes, the magazine and its cartoonists were under police protection, but no, French police are not armed so they were unable to assist.

      But you have to understand, arming the police might send the wrong message, it might make the members of the diversity dividend feel they’re not full and valued members of French society. It might cause them to resort to violent means to … never mind.

      • mawm says:

        WTF – they send unarmed cops to protect citizens threatened by violent muslim thugs? :shock:

        • KG says:

          Repeat after me:
          There are no violent muslims, only disturbed individuals who act contrary to the principles of the faith they espouse.
          Obama, Cameron, Hollande and Abbot said so.
          Therefore, unarmed police officers are perfectly adequate to deal with the occasional disturbed visitor to the office, non?

          • andy5759 says:

            1972, my first forrin trip. To Booloin on the ferry to do a bit of shopping. Get off ferry @ Calais, long wide tunnel like walk, standing at end of which is two Gendarmes in uniform, each gripping a machine gun, between them stands a flic, homburg pulled down at threatening yet rakish angle, big gabardine coat a la Bogart, Gitane casually dangling. My hysterical laughter almost got me deported. If the kermits don’t arm their Bill it’s probably because they’ve run out of antique WWII guns ‘n’ ammo. Or poseurs.

      • Phil Stephenson says:

        I always knew that British cops are not armed, but I thought France had more sense than that. The rationale, (if you can dignify such nonsense with that term), behind not arming cops is that some simpering fools hold that “violence begets violence,” so having British cops, or as it turns out, gendarmes, carrying firearms will only encourage the crims to arm themselves too, (as if they didn’t already do that). I have read in the past about brave English police officers advancing on armed offenders, equipped only with their truncheons, and instead of being seen for the lunacy that this presents, it was meant to suggest that they don’t need guns because they are brave enough and professional enough, to get by without them. One story told how the policeman got a finger shot off doing this. Truly madness!

        • Darin says:

          Yep,completely mad,not only was the security detail utterly effective,they were executed in the street as one begged for mercy.Crying damn shame if you ask me.

          • Wombat says:

            If I applied for a job as a skydiver and they told me I wasn’t allowed to have a parachute then I would promptly withdraw my application.

            Pardon the horrible phrase, but when those coppers turned up to work that day nobody had a gun to their head.

            Blokes martyring themselves to protect a system that refuses to protect them in return recalls to my mind the propaganda the commies would broadcast during the Vietnam war.

            “They will give you a medal, G.I., but only after you are dead.”

  6. Ronbo says:

    Like America, Europe will erupt into civil war when the almost inevitable economic collapse happens.

    This will occur when are various national Leftist Ruling Classes decide to loot what’s remains of the wealth of our Western nations.

    We The People will rise, but our various Ruling Classes have war gamed that situation and will declare martial law, nationalize all police forces and send in the military….Concentration camps have been already prepared in a dozen Western countries….Citizen will be murdered in the streets, killed by bullets they provided the armed forces by means of their taxes…

    What then? The estimates based on psychological studies show that 35 to 40% of the police and military will refuse to follow orders to shoot or arrest their fellow countrymen.

    Therefore, with so many defections and sabotage from within the ranks, no military organization that function…

    The armed forces of the various Regimes will collapse and bring down the political order…

    Anarchy…

    CIVIL WAR :!: :twisted:

    http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-second-us-civil-war-in-2015-yes.html

    • KG says:

      All that 40% need to do is provide arms, equipment and intelligence to the rebels.
      The main problem for patriots will be sorting out the genuine defectors from the plants, and the longer any civil war drags on the bigger that problem becomes.
      Better one massive, chaotic convulsion targeting the institutions that are leftist strongholds and the highest-profile individual targets. It doesn’t have to “win” in conventional terms and needn’t drag on for long in order to cripple the enemy.
      pour encourager and all that…..

  7. Flashman says:

    It’s far too late. 20+ years of open door immigration, nominal border control and trainloads of “refugee status” approvals mean the guinea worm of islam has multiplied and burrowed too deeply into Europe’s flesh ever to be excised without killing the host.

    Aside: even if the political will exists to try…which it doesn’t.

    • KG says:

      I think it could still be done, Flashman, if more than one European country erupts in civil war, others will likely follow. All conventional force analysis would be upended.
      And in a Europe-wide conflagration muslims would find themselves heavily outnumbered and out-gunned. Even if not, there’s a big difference between hysterical (mostly juvenile) muslim violence and the slow-burning, icy European capacity for killing once aroused.
      I don’t see any problem with defeating them and ridding Europe of their presence if ever TSHTF.
      But armchair pontificating aside, we can be sure of one thing….once the genie’s out of the bottle, all predictions and bets are off.

      • tranquil says:

        Agreed, KG.

        We know that anti-Islam sentiment is strongest in the Netherlands and France (where the PVV and Front Nationale respectively have a lot of support). Those two countries seem to be the key to a fightback.

  8. andy5759 says:

    There is also the reverse effect of the “soft invasion” many moslims have been groomed by European culture, I’m not thinking Wagner here, more shagging white hoes. Lots of lads find freedoms which they can’t resist. Lots of moslem girls discover things like education and suchlike. Some are still moslems in their hearts, many will have ditched it like a stinking turd. We shall prevail. To do that we need a single voice, a single organiser, no left, no right, no diversions. Single issue. One problem, one solution. End of. Nasty thought, think rabid dog.

  9. KG says:

    Front page article, today’s Brisbane Courier Mail newspaper :shock:

    “..The time for weasel words and treading on eggshells is over. We owe it to the growing number of victims to open our eyes and acknowledge the unmistakable reality that radical Islam and Western values cannot coexist peacefully.”

    http://www.couriermail.com.au/?nk=9172dd89d0cc2d75b5c5915cafbc09b9

    • Ronbo says:

      There is no such thing as “radical Islam” or “moderate Islam” there is only ISLAM – the ancient totalitarian killer/death cult and civilization destroyer. :evil: