The esteemed Francis Porretto:

‘When Will It Be Enough?
…..Islam calls itself a religion. It is not. It’s the fusion of three cultural subvarieties:
1. Theological: the statements in the Koran about Allah and Man’s relation to him;
2. Sociological: the Koran’s decrees concerning men’s relations with one another;
3. Political: the demand that Islam rule the entire world, under the legal code called sharia.
It should be plain from the previous material that Islam’s political culture cannot coexist with any other. Whenever the Islamic world has rubbed up against another political culture, it has waged war against it. Moreover, such wars have the worst characteristic of all religious wars: Islam’s warriors never admit defeat. They win, or they retreat and regroup, or they die. Yet Western nations have unanimously decided that Islam is a “religion” entitled to protection under the First Amendment, and that Muslim immigrants should be admitted to the West on an equal basis with any others.
There has never been a folly comparable to this in the history of Mankind. Yet the United States has embraced it as fully as every other nation of the First World. We call it “multiculturalism.”….’
The money quote from a brilliant post:
Islam is massively useful to our political class. The powers that be are grateful for the threat it presents, and for the repeated evidences of that threat it provides. It serves to justify all manner of intrusions on Americans’ rights, and all manner of incursions upon our privacy. Thus, to expect that the State will ever act against Islam, regardless of how its atrocities proliferate, is a foolish notion.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to The esteemed Francis Porretto:

  1. Ronbo says:

    Islam can be best defined as an ancient totalitarian killer/suicide cult that worships death and seeks world domination is order to destroy life.

    This is the reason why Islam is protected by the Socialists in all Western countries, because in its heart of darkness, Socialism is a totalitarian death cult as well.

    Thus Socialism and Islam are but two sides of the same death coin.

    …and this is the reason why people like us who love life are hated and attacked by the Green and the Red.

    The Evil is always at war with The Good until Judgment Day.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      So here’s what I find interesting about that. When someone upsets the 7th century iSlamo-fascist cockroaches, they go out of their way to MDK as many people as they can find.

      When a few people from the 21st century get upset about their friends and neighbours being shot, blown up and/or decapitated, they will attack the property of the muzloids – the Daily Mail article said about some “blank grenades” (whatever-the-fuck they are), shots fired and a kebab shot “blown up”, but no mention of casualties.

      Imagine what’s going to happen when we get really upset and start actually killing these roaches?

      • Darin says:

        “Imagine what’s going to happen when we get really upset and start actually killing these roaches?”

        I think when it finally gets to that point something will have been unleashed the media will be very afraid of and they won’t say a peep about it.

  2. Ronbo says:

    It will be interesting to see how far the Euro-Anger against the Muslims will go this time, but in all European nations a growing right wing movement in standing in the wings waiting to take over governments.

    In particular this is true in France with the growth of Le Pen’s National Front, which may be only one election away from taking control in Paris. The far left regime there was in big trouble before this Islamic terrorist attack and this incident may have pushed socialist tent over.

    What will the Right in France change if it comes to power :?:

    First of all, the European Right is not the American Right. The Right in America stands for a small central government, capitalism and individual rights. The European Right is fascist and stands for strong central government and restricted civil rights.

    If France is that such a strong centralized government it could decide overnight to deport all of that country’s five million Muslims back to their countries of origin.

    What if the Muslims former countries refuse to take them back? Also, what about second and third generation Muslims who have become French citizens? One can imagine a Third Reich solution to that problem – The Final Solution.

    Death on the assembly line for Muslims :?:

    Germany wiped out 90% of Europe’s Jewish population in little over three years.

    This was in the middle of world war.

    • GW says:

      Not The Final Solution. That one’s already taken. I vote for The Only Solution with new and improved showers.

      Actually, I look at France and just have to shake my head at how screwed they are. Great background story at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/7/french-islamist-mini-states-grow-into-problem-out-/

      The easy options ended the day the left through open the doors for Muslim immigration. Any solution should include their heads on a pike.

    • Wombat says:

      -“The Right in America stands for a small central government, capitalism and individual rights.”

      If this is the case then the “Right” in America has never held power in over 100 years.

      America has been growing government and centralising power for five generations now.

      • Ronbo says:

        Actually, the small government types, the constitutionalists, held power three times in the 20th century in regards to the presidency: Taft (1909-1913), Coolridge (1923 to 1929) and Reagan (1981-1989) – these periods are known as happy days with large expansion of industry, commerce, and low unemployment.

        In regards to the strong unconstitutional central government, I’m sorry to say the Progressive Movement in America came to power by means of Teddy Roosevelt (cousin of Franklin Roosevelt) in 1903 and in ten years when pedal to the metal under Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

        Yes, for over 100 years the Progressives acting by means of the government, courts and major Institutions has pretty much ran the agenda in this country, but their rule has never NOT been challenged by factions in the Republican and Democrat Party (until the early 21st century when the Zell Miller, the last conservative Democrat was purged).

        However, in 2009 the first systemic attempt to restore the Republic started with the Tea Party Movement which has been very successful in just five years and rolling back the Progressive Wave in electoral victories most recently last November, when the Progressives seats in Congress went back to levels not seen for 100 years.

        The future looks good for the TPM branch of the Republican Party, that is on a purge itself in regards to Progressives of either party.

        THE BIG MO IS WITH THE AMERICAN RIGHT :!:

        The next big campaign after we take back the political system is the Long March through The Institutions. We will also encourage like minded people in other countries to take back their governments for We The People.

        • Wombat says:

          One problem.

          If a genuine small-government party won office then the dollar would instantly collapse.

          Right now the drug of inflation is the only thing keeping the USA alive.

          Like a man on PCP who’s been riddled with bullets. It’s only a matter of time.

  3. GW says:

    A religion is defined by faith. Islam is not a religion because it is defined by compulsion. That is the hallmark of an ideology.

    I can, for instance, decide to leave Christianity when I no longer believe in it. If I try that as a Muslim, Islamic doctrine holds that I should be murdered.

    I can take issue with an interpretation of Christianity. For instance, I think those who take the bible literally are wrong. The opening pages of Genesis tell two different tales of creation, which two tales cannot by their terms be reconciled. Thus, I think the Bible tells us, from the get go, that it is to not to be read for literal truths. I can make that argument respectfully. Were I to argue such a point of Islamic orthodoxy, I should be killed for blasphemy.

    If I lived in a Muslim country, according to Islamic doctrine, I would be given a choice, convert to Islam, pay a special tax and be treated as a third class citizen, or be killed.

    The centrality of Islam is compulsion, not faith. Thus it is an ideology, not a religion.

    I disagree with F.P., not about the usefulness of Islam to the West’s political class, but the nature of the usefulness. One, Muslim immigrants are a solid left wing voting block. Two, Muslims are every bit as dedicated to the dismantling of Western civilization as the left is. That is why the left has held open the doors for Muslim immigration for the past half century, almost four decades before the nature of the Muslim threat became obvious. And those two reasons are why the left will never take any real action against the Islamic threat, at least while some remnants of Western civilization still stand.

    • Darin says:

      All true,but I would also add that Christians are allowed to read more than just the one book as well.

      • Wombat says:

        I couldn’t care less whether islam is a religion or not.

        If everyone, minorities included, had the same rights and responsibilities then it wouldn’t even be an issue, would it?

        The flying spaghetti monster religion is no more or less real that islam, Catholicism, Buddhism or Hinduism.

        Trying to claim that some religions are “proper” and others aren’t really seems a bit petty and ridiculous. NOI.

        • KG says:

          The difference is that islam is no religion at all, but a murderous ideology.
          Yet it enjoys the protections given to peaceful religions.

          • Wombat says:

            So the protections are the issue?

            Why should anyone enjoy protections not available to others, regardless of whether they belong to a “proper” religion or not.

            Tax breaks? “Enhanced” freedom of speech?

            Sounds like a government protection racket to me.

  4. Cadwallader says:

    The Times of Israel has today reported Netanyahu’s speech where he says all of us must unite to combat Islamo terrorism. He most certainly does not rule out physical fighting either. I wager we won’t hear this sort of talk from The White House or #10 Downing Street.

    • KG says:

      I’m bloody sure we won’t.

    • Wombat says:

      The Whitehouse and 10 Downing Street will differ only on the details.
      When they say “unite to combat Islamo terrorism” they mean “keep quietly paying your taxes to fund the wars required to reach the geo-political objectives of us and our banker-elite buddies”.

      At least we know who our billion dollar state surveillance systems are designed to track down and keep tabs on. Not terrorists but folks reading blogs like this one.

  5. Jamie says:

    John Key is a treasonous chicken-hawk dog who protects ISIS terrorists in NZ

    http://r1016132.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/rules-of-engagement/

    That is treason by law and he needs to be put on trial ASAP

    http://r1016132.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/treason-crimes-act-1961-section-73/

    I am armed 24/7

    Every other citizen should be packing heat too

    Fuck you John Key!!!

    • KG says:

      Not impressed with your first link Jamie. It sure doesn’t fit this site and I don’t want to be seen as promoting that crap.

      • Ronbo says:

        I agree with you, KG…http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_good.gif

        The time has not yet come for armed resistance to the Regime.

        When the almost inevitable war the starts, it is THEY who must be clearly seen by the world as starting the violence.

        We patriots only act in defense.

        I’m thinking of the morning of April 19, 1775, which happened, BTW, because of a “government gun grab” by the British Empire.

        I think even Sam Adams the “Father of the Revolution” would agree with me – ALL PEACEFUL ACTIONS AGAINST OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT ARE FAIR, BUT THEY MUST TAKE FIRST BLOOD.

      • Jamie says:

        Don’t come crying to me