Changing the NZ flag

Posted on May 6, 2015 by KG

This project has nothing to do with the popular will. It’s a determined push by John Key and his fellow “progressives” to alter the culture of New Zealand. And the slimy Kiwi media is fully on-board with the whole dishonest exercise. The front page of Stuff “news” this morning kinda gives the game away…
Blatant propagandizing in the service of a cause.The so-called “consultation” process is nothing but a front to legitimize something that the majority of Kiwis are opposed to. Should the propaganda work (and it probably will) Key – despite ignoring the overwhelming results of the smacking referendum, for example – will have the arrogance to claim a mandate for change. ‘Vox populi vox Dei’ and all that…when it suits.
How typical of Key and his leftist allies.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Changing the NZ flag

  1. Cadwallader says:
    May 6, 2015 at 07:47

    I am not sure that the majority of New Zealanders are against a change to the flag. What I am convinced about is that a majority of New Zealanders aren’t moved either way. In other words the so-called debate is little more than a talk-fest.

  2. Redbaiter says:
    May 6, 2015 at 12:59

    I think the page may have changed KG. Even when I looked at it early this morning I couldn’t see the flag reference.

    Nevertheless, the flag change operation is as you say a blatantly dishonest scheme, and brings Key’s duplicity and deceit into the open.

    I doubt any Labour govt could even have been as deceitful as this. This is a demonstration of how fucked in the head Progressives like Key are in that they give not one skerrick of moral consideration to their actions.

    Remember when we used to say the left always justified the means by the end? Well nowadays National is no different.

    I am have absolutely had enough of all NZ politicians (like Gantt Guy) and when you see the cowardice and duplicity on display in this flag change issue, and especially with all of National staying silent on what a fraud it is, it confirms that they’re all tarred with the same brush.

    • Cadwallader says:
      May 6, 2015 at 15:14

      I question your doubt whether any Labour Government could have been as deceitful as you allege the current one is re the flag debate. Think back to the time when the Clark government jammed through the extinguishment of the right of appeal to the Privy Council.The right was a constitutional one and the government at the time flew in the face of the considered opinions of a majority of practising lawyers and destroyed it at the seeming whim of a List MP.

      • KG says:
        May 6, 2015 at 16:04

        I also think of the Labour government refusing to hand over large parts of NZ to Maori, Cad.
        Key certainly fixed that, didn’t he?
        I detest Labour, but like Redbaiter, I think Key is no better – and in some ways even worse.

  3. Warren Tooley says:
    May 6, 2015 at 21:49

    What’s the difference between Key and Labour. The difference between drinking poison knowingly, and have poison mixed with your drink. People think National is better then Labour, but all national is, is slowly destroying our country. Labour is quickly destroying our country.

    Anyhow, I posted this on Terry’s blog, and it shows, how this is the most treasonous act:

    Why the battering ram?
    Why the battering ram?

    Why is John Key ramming this through. Our flag has a union jack on it. What does that mean. The queen at her coronation swore to uphold the law of God and the preservation of the gospel of Jesus with justice and mercy to the best of her ability. While the union jack is on our flag, this still stands. But what about when this is no longer the case. If the flag were white, this would mean it is no longer the case as we surrender. And if it were white our opponents could do their own thing, bring in their flag. And that’s what is about to happen, its going to be a Maori flag. The 15th section of the earth charter or another section gives the indiginenious people special rights. And that’s what we’ll be doing. This flag change is the most treasonous act. If enough people see this, maybe there’ll be no more John Key. Maybe Winston Peters, will then be Prime Minister, lol. This is the link to the queen’s coronation (if it works):

    https://www.google.co.nz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0C…

  5. Cadwallader says:
    May 7, 2015 at 09:39

    My neighbour’s Dad was talking to me last night. He fought for both NZ and Canada at different times of his life. In WW2 he was with the NZ army but latterly was a part of the Canadian army. He remains nostalgic as to his war service even at the age of 92. I expected him to be opposed to a change of the NZ flag on the basis he had fought “beneath” it. He was in a diametrically different spot. “I didn’t proudly fight under the NZ flag I was f@@king conscripted to!” “I fought under the brutish weight of government and not under any noble aspiration.” He laments at his fellow soldiers who forget this vital point on Anzac Day. I respect his attitude.

  6. dondiego says:
    May 7, 2015 at 22:12

    LoL. Silly prick. Don’t you have womens studies homework or something far more important to worry about?

    • Darin says:
      May 8, 2015 at 14:05

      (troll barrage earlier for context)

      • KG says:
        May 8, 2015 at 14:23

        Sigh…the braindead assholes seem to think they’re doing something sooooo original.
        How do you explain to a chimp it’s behaving like a monkey?

        • Darin says:
          May 8, 2015 at 14:27

          It’s a shame the internet isn’t face to face,if it were we could just shoot them http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

          • KG says:
            May 8, 2015 at 14:31

            Aye. I suspect their “bravery” would be somewhat diminished by the prospect.

  7. KG says:
    May 8, 2015 at 10:21

    I’m not sure what conscription into the NZ Army during WW2 has to do with fighting as a volunteer at Gallipoli.
    The 92 year-old sounds like every other embittered socialist prick to me.

    • Cadwallader says:
      May 8, 2015 at 10:52

      I am not sure that he is either embittered or a socialist. (He reads your blog occasionally and seems to agree with the tenor of matters expressed here.) What I detect is that he saw the war he was in, for what it was, and witnessed politicians of all stripes for what they are. He wasn’t, on his own admission, on a noble venture as he had been press-ganged into putting his life on the line. Surely conscription is the worst possible example of the state gobbling up the rights of the human individual. It is a declaration that the rights of the state have supremacy over the rights of the individual.

      • KG says:
        May 8, 2015 at 11:06

        “Surely conscription is the worst possible example of the state gobbling up the rights of the human individual.”
        I agree with that – up to a point.
        But if a country is threatened with invasion, and the male population is too de-balled, to self-absorbed and simply too fearful to fight, then what else is to be done?
        Note I said threatened with invasion.

        • Cadwallader says:
          May 8, 2015 at 11:11

          I would have sufficient faith in my fellow man that a volksgeist would drive them to the protection of our borders. It wouldn’t be a universal movement as the likes of Greenies would undoubtedly baulk at defence of the land but who knows? (Aucklanders seem unable to rise as one in a rates revolt at present.)

          • Darin says:
            May 8, 2015 at 14:07

            Same here,the left were patriotic for about the ten minutes after 9/11.