I’m not holding my breath just yet

24 Responses to I’m not holding my breath just yet

1. KG says:

   May 15, 2015 at 16:24

   Just like he was going to “crack down” on immigration, eh? The creep is a serial bullshitter.
   Britain could do with more of these:
   ‘The Dowager Marchioness of Reading – obituary
   Aristocrat who raced stock cars and praised the fighting spirit of the English football hooligan
   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/11605815/The-Dowager-Marchioness-of-Reading-obituary.html
   • Darin says:

     May 15, 2015 at 17:21

     Yup,I’ll have to see it to believe it and something tells me it will end up being Christian conservative groups that get the hammer.

     Yes we certainly do need more like her,many more
     • Wombat says:

       May 15, 2015 at 20:01

       +1 on this being a run around to backstabbing nationalists and conservatives of all stripes.

       Who’s copped all the charges thus far for hatespeech? Choudry and his bearded muppets or the EDL?

       No, muslims have been imported to the west specifically to create the problems that will allow the politicians to claim that tyranny is the cure.
       • Yokel says:

         May 16, 2015 at 05:30

         +1
2. KG says:

   May 15, 2015 at 16:42

   If the Cameron government was at all serious about the problem of islamists, they wouldn’t be letting these bastards back into the country:
   ‘More than 700 Britons of “significant concern” have travelled to Syria, the country’s top counter-terrorism officer has disclosed.
   Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner, revealed the new figure as he said he was becoming increasingly concerned that young people who would once join street gangs are now turning to terrorism.
   More than a third of the 700 suspects who have been to follow jihad in Islamic State are now back in Britain, Mr Rowley confirmed.
   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11605362/700-terror-suspects-have-travelled-to-Syria-Scotland-Yard-says.html
   • Darin says:

     May 15, 2015 at 17:23

     I wouldn’t be concerned no matter how may want to go and fight.I would even say provide them with plane tickets,just be sure and pick up their passports as the leave.
3. G P says:

   May 15, 2015 at 17:26

   ‘The PM will tell the National Security Council: “For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone.’

   I might be able to take him seriously, if upon proof of someone fighting for isis is determined, that person and any and all relatives are excluded from living in Britain or the EU permanently – no exceptions.

   Also, hate preachers such as anjem choudary and any and all relatives are immediately afforded first class tickets to a nice war-torn theocracy such as Iran. If they don’t go willingly then they are dispatched in parachutes from air force carriers to their favourite desert oasis a la isis style with their hands tied behind their backs in the same way Christians/Jews/atheists are dispatched in islamic theocracies.

   The West must never believe they have changed or have “found the Lord” as these people have never known love or compassion and are therefore incapable of showing these qualities towards anyone, even their own families. They are nothing but piranhas.
   • Oswald Bastable says:

     May 15, 2015 at 20:29

     What’s this parachute shit!
     • KG says:

       May 16, 2015 at 06:31

       
4. G P says:

   May 15, 2015 at 17:30

   We need to get a dose of whatever China has. If a totalitarian regime like China can see the threat, why can’t dhimmi Westerners?

   http://www.westernjournalism.com/china-makes-major-moves-to-ban-islam/
   • KG says:

     May 15, 2015 at 17:41

     From the link:
     ‘Maybe one day, the West will realize that freedom can’t exist for those who want to take your freedom.’
   • Odakyu-sen says:

     May 15, 2015 at 21:27

     Japan is watching, too…
5. mawm says:

   May 15, 2015 at 18:27

   We all know that Cameron made the promise knowing full well that the European Court will rule that it will infringe on their ‘uman rights. It’s all kabuki theatre.
   • Ronbo says:

     May 15, 2015 at 18:43

     Britain is about as free from European Union edicts, as my State of Washington is free from the dictates of our Imperial Federal Government.

     In the 21st century America has become what it rebelled against in the 18th century – a European model centralized state ruled from the Capitol City by an oligarchy.

     The only thing changed is the substitution of London in favor of Washington, D.C.
     • Wombat says:

       May 15, 2015 at 20:09

       At least before the War of Independence the mandates of the king took a reasonable time to reach the new world.

       How did Byles Mather put it? “Which is better – to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?”

       Well, at great cost the Americans gained a few hundred years of relative freedom. I must wonder what we will have to sacrifice, and what kind of time it will buy our children’s children.
6. The Gantt Guy says:

   May 15, 2015 at 20:14

   I’ll believe the treasonous bastard is serious when UAF is proscribed under anti-terrorism legislation and Andy Choudhary put on a plane to any one of his beloved third world shite holes.
7. G P says:

   May 15, 2015 at 20:26

   Yeah right Dave…

   ‘The BBC is under fire after the Home Affairs Editor appeared to compare notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary to Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela.’

   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3081364/BBC-fire-reporter-Mark-Easton-compares-extremist-preacher-Anjem-Choudary-Gandhi-Mandela.html

   ‘Even Choudary himself rejected the BBC’s comparisons last night. He said: ‘The comparisons with Mandela and Gandhi are false. They are kuffar (non-believers) going to hellfire whilst I am a Muslim. Alhamudililah (praise God).’’
   • The Gantt Guy says:

     May 15, 2015 at 20:57

     hmmm. Perhaps a more accurate comparison than she intended, but for completely different reasons. All three = collectivist terrorist assholes working feverishly to destroy western society, individual liberty and free markets.
     • Darin says:

       May 16, 2015 at 14:34

       The only purpose Choudary serves is as a high water mark.The fact that he is allowed to stay in GB and preach his filth is because the tide of patriotism is out at the moment.We can tell when the tide starts coming back in when he is either kicked out or when the last thing he feels is a thump on his forehead just as the lights go out.
       • G P says:

         May 17, 2015 at 01:59

         ‘The only purpose Choudary serves is as a high water mark.’

         And that water mark is way too high. Imagine if a Catholic or atheist tried that on – they’d be hung out to dry.

         anjem choudary is a failed, beer-swilling, dope-smoking buffon of a law student who needs to have this description trotted out every time he opens his mouth and lets the wind play with his tongue.
8. Yokel says:

   May 16, 2015 at 09:19

   The IT rag “The Register” had a quick look at it and wasn’t overly impressed, either:
   http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/14/extremism_bill_to_allow_targeting_of_lawabiding_citizens/
   Worded so loosely at this stage that it would be a very easy swerve to use it against those of use who are not eagerly anticipating the invitation to become a carpet muncher.

   But much worse in my view is another story of theirs:
   http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/15/case_against_gchq_scrambled_by_under_the_radar_legislation/
   There was an ongoing case in the courts against GCHQ for hacking, something that was illegal for GCHQ to undertake when the case was started. And funnily enough, now it is legal! And the case is still ongoing! Read the comments too.

   Retroactive legislation is very bad form in states that allegedly abide by the rule of law. For a while it has seemed as though some branches of government considered themselves to be beyond the law. Now we are beginning to see the law say that they are beyond the control of the law, and can do what they damn well like. That is very, very bad form. 1935-ish bad form?
   • Darin says:

     May 16, 2015 at 14:42

     Yup,and it’s occurring at all levels of government.A friend of mine recently lost his right of way to his property because the county decided to annex property adjacent to his which is completely illegal.

     The county board of supervisors informed him that if he didn’t like it he would have to sue the county.Problem is even if he wins he can’t sue for legal fees.So,$20,000 out of his pocket even if he wins.
     • Wombat says:

       May 16, 2015 at 20:33

       As Steyn puts it, the process itself is the penalty.

       Of course, this ends when these petty tinpot dictators are too afraid to leave their homes.

       The farmer who was fined for having his quad-bike helmets mounted to the wall next to the bikes instead of on the bikes themselves is a prime example.

       If that happened to a farmer I knew, dead set, that OH+S bastard would lose a hand for theft.

       Quite fitting IMHO.
9. G P says:

   May 17, 2015 at 02:47

   Best news of the day – there should be one appeal only and then carrying out of the sentence

   http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/05/15/excellent-death-for-the-boston-marathon-muslim-terrorist-bomber/#comment-444977