Why Trump matters:

‘…The Republican field is frozen in error by lack of either vision or courage on this issue, and by its need to please its corporate donors.  These corporate donors want cheaper labor forever and delude themselves about the not far off social and political consequences of massive illegal immigration. After all, those consequences will reach them later than they do the rest of us — they have not shown up yet in the gated communities, elite private schools, high-income jobs and country clubs of the nation’s governing class.  Only the Democratic Party knows what is really happening, and it appears destined to get exactly what it wants: A few hundred thousand more dependable client voters in a bunch of key states, after which it can rest easily in the certainty of victory in every presidential election for the next half century.
….The significance of the previously unserious Trump’s stratospheric rise — on this issue alone — should get through even the thickest skull.
The 2016 presidential election hangs in the balance much earlier than usual….’

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Why Trump matters:

  1. Ronbo says:

    I think the election of 2016 will be the election of “1860 2.0” – Then as now, the country is divided and compromise impossible – Then as now, the stalwart Republicans (The base of the party, not the leadership on top) want a 180 degree change in the federal government and the culture. Then as now, the elephant in the room that everyone tries to ignore is slavery (although in Newspeak we call it “Liberalism” or “Progressivism” or “Socialism” but the bottom line is that it is the worst form of tyranny invented by man. SLAVERY STRAIGHT UP!)

    Thus we have reached another decisive stage of American history that could easily develop into the Second U.S. Civil War – and I see Trump as the “Lincoln Figure” who if elected will very likely have the same effect on the Socialist reactionaries of today that the election of Lincoln had on the Southern reactionary slave owners of the Old South in 1860.

    Of course. nothing is inevitable; however, if something has happened in the past for the same general reasons – it could happen again – as each generation learns nothing and forgets everything.

  2. Contempt says:

    Wonder if any government gooks are reading this? I can easily imagine some turmoil to be stirred up and oBowa taking over as dictator. His recent comment that he could be elected a third time ain’t funny.

    Yes I have backed Trump with words and a bit of money. I will continue to do so.

    • Ronbo says:

      I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama pulls something like that prior to the election in November, 2016…Declares martial law….cancels the election…State of Emergency…Mass arrests, etc.

      I mean he is dictator in everything but name as things stand today….and he does have the command of the Armed Forces, most police department, federal law enforcement, the National Guard, etc.

      What dictator has ever left office voluntarily?

      The usual way is death by natural or unnatural causes.

      Obama knows when he departs office that he has no legal protection – and that his enemies can indict him on dozens of felonies he committed while president…I doubt this will happen if Obama leaves office on Jan. 20, 2017 without kicking up a fuss, but Obama is a psychopath who puts no trust in others.

      50-50 chance…But if he does dig in his heels and decides to go out in a Hitler style Gotterdamerung, I say BRING IT ON!http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

  3. Alan says:

    It seems that Obama considers himself political royalty. It wouldn’t surprise me that by executive order he crowns himself ‘King’ and dictator for life. All it would take then is for a Cromwell like figure to rise up and take him out in a massive revolt.

  4. mawm says:

    From another point of view Trump matters because he is allowing the naturally conservative candidates like Cruz to move to the right publicly without 24/7 outrage from the MSM, and makes a RINO’s like Bush look like the twat he is.

  5. KG says:

    From American Thinker:
    ‘Hillary donors also funding Jeb Bush’

  6. The Gantt Guy says:

    Is anyone else watching the warm-up act for the GOP debate? From the sound of his voice, I reckon Lindsey Graham spent a bit of time downing Dutch Courage with Boehner and McConnell before taking the stage.

  7. mara says:

    I would LOVE to see Fiorina in a debate with the Hildebeast. Sadly, it will probably never happen.

  8. Pascal says:

    My friends, just so you don’t get too worked up over Fiorina. Especially those of you who rightly expect she SHOULD be able to destroy the hildabeast.

    Let me advise you look into her disastrous political meltdown when she ran against the idiot Barbara Boxer for senate in 2010. She was backed by the RINOs in the primaries to defeat a solid conservative, Chuck Devore. Then went on to suddenly become weak-kneed in the general election. FioRINO she turned out to be, in the pattern of McClaim and Romnoid never attacking Xero as we would have wished, turning off base voters.

    And then there is the matter of her acclaimed business experience. In the general her destruction of the brain trust at Lucent Technologies and her awful buying of Compaq for HP (that led to the HP board buying out her contract rather than let her continue their demise) all came out. Here is just one such story. http://readersupportednews.org/pm-section/186-186/3463-the-job-killing-touch-how-carly-fiorina-wrecked-hewlett-packard-and-the-bell-labs-and-set-american-science-decades-back-by-decades?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page=

    I like her as attack dog, against Lefties, especially alleged wimmin. But I would not be surprised she’d turn on any real conservative GOP running as many RINOs back-stabbers later do.

    Better you know all this now and not find out the hard way as did CA GOP primary voters in 2010. You can thank me later.

  9. Pascal says:

    More. I got a Carly fundraising email as I was posting the above. Here’s a screencap.

    1) Apparently the NY Times and Washington Post think that a Carly win would be great for them (I’m guessing because they’ve beaten her before with news of her failures).

    2) Her fundraisers think the base (me) will be impressed by those two SSM liking her.

  10. The Gantt Guy says:

    Anyone still in doubt about why the Fox pundits attacked Trump and ignored to two smartest men on stage (Cruz and Carson) at the debate, look no further than this pic of Jeb! with a couple of his besties..