Open House 7/19/19

Posted on July 20, 2019 by Darin
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Open House 7/19/19

  3. Pascal says:
    July 20, 2019 at 19:25

    Here’s good news.

    https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2019/07/trumps-hamilton-distraction.html

    The title gives little clue that it is good news.

    If it is true it means the non-politician Trump is a far better player than the GOPe nevertrumpers (both open and still hidden potential backstabbers) ever imagined. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

  4. Pascal says:
    July 20, 2019 at 23:05

    WaPo published the following tweet

    Opinion: Those who don’t condemn Trump’s racism are complicit in his bigotry.

    that happens to include a link to the op-ed itself.

    https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1152390003789574155

    With this the Washington Post is asserting ‘if you’re not with us you’re against us.’

    So let us review the record. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_mail.gif These are the same fanatics who find the kutzpah to freely label anyone who disagrees with them as Nazis.

    In their desperation at losing influence over more and more of the public the WaPo has clearly discarded any efforts to hide their projection.

    • Pascal says:
      July 21, 2019 at 02:30

      Me too Darin. A no longer living murderer cannot repeat his crimes.

      However, don’t overlook personal gain by those permitting the system to fail us time and again.

      Those in the power seats and their influence peddlers have cared little about those of us the death penalty ultimately protects and there is ample evidence as to what could motivate that besides bleeding heart arguments.

      1. Reducing the risk to murderers invariably lowered the penalty to those who commit lesser crimes. I have heard the pleas by defense attorneys to judges too many times “it’s not as if my client killed anybody your honor.” And thus the ever more lax sentences meted out to convicted felons and lesser miscreants.

      2.The subsequent increase in crime due to lessened potential sentences provided reasons for legislators to write laws that force innocent citizens to submit to regulations designed to reduce the risk they MIGHT commit a crime.

      And the bureaucracies grow from thence, and what have we seen where that has led? God help us because we have failed to help ourselves.

  6. Pascal says:
    July 21, 2019 at 04:16

    https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/new-epstein-documents-reportedly-name-staggering-amount-elites/

    The judges stated that “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known prime minister, and other world leaders” may be on the incriminating documents.

    Popcorn

    • Pascal says:
      July 21, 2019 at 06:32

      of course, that is the same answer one would give to the question how could she have been so stupid to make the claims in the first place.

  8. Darin says:
    July 21, 2019 at 15:14

    Meanwhile Trump is quietly getting things done-

    https://youtu.be/FPav4wqBHbM

    The difference between actually doing something to effect a change and constantly just talking about doing something?You can only fund raise off the latter. Gop establishment promises are about raising money,not actually doing anything.

  9. Darin says:
    July 22, 2019 at 02:47

    I would say the difference here is with one you have a boss that hires and fires based on performance.Something that seldom occurs in the public sector.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-jeff-bezos-richard-branson-how-billionaires-are-joining-the-space-race-2019-07-20/

  11. Michael in Nelson says:
    July 27, 2019 at 06:04

    Talk about shooting the messenger!

    https://www.breitbart.com/education/2019/07/26/portland-state-punishes-professor-behind-academic-journal-hoax-papers/

    A lesson for those who think the Left can be reformed.

    • Darin says:
      July 27, 2019 at 11:48

      That the papers were published tells us two things-
      #1 The papers were never reviewed.
      #2 They were never reviewed because those doing the reviewing were confident that their liberal bias had no opposition on campus.