‘Jeb Bush to award Hillary Clinton with 2013 Liberty Medal’

Posted on June 29, 2013 by KG

Perhaps Amb. Stevens could present it to her…oh, hang on….

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to ‘Jeb Bush to award Hillary Clinton with 2013 Liberty Medal’

  1. Ronbo says:
    June 29, 2013 at 06:54

    It’s official – The Republican Party has merged with the Democrat Party which has merged with the Community Party, USA. :evil:

    No doubt Jack Reed, the only American Communist buried in Red Square, is smiling in his grave. :evil:

    I remember when I was stationed in Berlin during the 1970s I asked my elderly landlord why he had done nothing to stop Hitler from coming to power in the 1930s.

    He said, “Don’t you understand :?: I’m little people… I could do nothing….”

    I said, “We ‘little people’ would never allow a Hitler to take control of America.”

    He said, “A country powerful enough to occupy the capital city of Germany for decades is powerful enough ignore little people like you, or send you to a concentration camp.”

  2. mawm says:
    June 29, 2013 at 07:08

    “Liberty” to get away with lies medal. That woman should be in gaol or strapped to a chair that can give her a tingle down her leg! BJ should be alongside, they are both traitors. :evil:

  3. RWT says:
    June 29, 2013 at 08:18

    Is that for real, a medal to her from a Bush!

    Did his brain fall out of head or something!

    Really sad what America is coming to these days.

    • Pascal says:
      June 29, 2013 at 08:42

      No. Americans need a SECOND party.

      Sigh.

      Given the numbers who remain without a clue after the repetitions of such behavior, that alone means this cannot end well.

  4. Pascal says:
    June 29, 2013 at 08:31

    In related party news:
    Palin to Rubio: ‘Hope It Was Worth 30 Pieces of Silver’
    But not to McCain? Of course not. That might show ingratitude or something. :puke: :vomit:

  5. Carol-Christian Soldier says:
    June 29, 2013 at 10:03

    did you all really expect anything of honor from a bush!?? Come ON!!
    Carol-CS

  7. countenance says:
    June 29, 2013 at 10:53

    The “Presidential Race” in 2016: Bush vs Clinton. Just what a country desperately demanding change deserves.

  8. KG says:
    June 29, 2013 at 12:24

    God help us….

  9. Darin says:
    June 29, 2013 at 12:34

    Don’t worry,it won’t be a Bush.CristyCreme has already been selected by the media as the Rep nominee.

    • KG says:
      June 29, 2013 at 13:02

      Yep. He’s already started making noises in order to distance himself from O. And people will believe him.

      • Ronbo says:
        June 30, 2013 at 00:56

        What many Republicans forget that the first American President to embrace “Progressive” politics (the American version of Germany’s “Social Democrats”) was Teddy Roosevelt in the early 1900s…

        This encouraged a certain college professor by the name of Woodrow Wilson to enact the “Progressive” socialist agenda starting with the direct election of U.S. Senators and the income tax when he became president in 1913.

        President Wilson, you may recall was a white racist who allowed the KKK epic “The Birth of a Nation” to be screened first at the White House in 1916.

        BTW, In 1916 when Wilson was running for reelection, he promised to keep America out of WW I, but just after starting his second term had Congress to declare war of Germany.

        Wilson also helped create the League of Nations – the first attempt at world government – although the stalwart Republicans in the Senate refused to allow the USA to join.

        Thus 100 years after a long birthing process in the wombs of both major political parties – the Baby Progressive has been born, all red (and I predict soon) very bloody.

        In fact, the tiny creature looks a lot like Lenin’s Bolshevik Party that President Wilson – for some strange reason – sent American troops to Russia in 1918 to destroy.

        Perhaps Wilson was jealous of Lenin’s rapid introduction of socialism to Russia?

        • Pascal says:
          June 30, 2013 at 02:24

          Nice, concise review Ron.

          And I’ve been shushed by some Republicans for pointing out your opening line while most of the rest keep their heads a bit uncomfortably up their arse in the sand.

  10. Contempt says:
    June 30, 2013 at 03:34

    There will be a “presidential race” in 2016? :shock: