Since America, Britain and France have gone to war on behalf of the UN against the Libyan dictator, a few questions seem to be in order.
If Libya then why not China, North Korea, Zimbabwe, Burma, Saudi Arabia, to name a few? And if Libya, then at some future date will the UN decide that a particular faction in France or Britain or America deserves the same level of support?
Russian and Chinese warplanes taking out government forces in those countries–at the behest of the UN–would, after all, be merely following the precedent set by Western leaders….
In other words, foreign policy and sovereignty is being subordinated to the UN and the West is already at that point which the “progressives” desire–an unelected (largely Marxist) body has effectively been handed the means to impose a world government on people who have had no say whatsoever in the matter. Handed that power by our own politicians.
A few more questions:
How many UN agreements, treaties, protocols and so forth are the Australian people subject to?
What are they?
How many of those did Australians get to vote on before being bound by them?
see: ‘Impeach Obama For Sending The US to War Without Congressional Approval’
