This is Hilarious
![]()
Category Archives: Uncategorized
His Mistake Was Pleading Guilty
One should never plead guilty to a law that makes criticism of government policies a crime.
One pleads not guilty on the grounds that any law silencing dissent is a violation of basic human rights and thereby illegitimate.
Going further, it also makes a mockery of this court that rules over subjects allegedly free to choose their representatives in government. One cannot make such choices freely when one is not free to discuss the consequences of current law.
🚨🇬🇧 “This offence is so serious that an immediate custodial sentence is unavoidable”
Britain is the new North Korea pic.twitter.com/ZurpLZaN6I
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) August 13, 2024
Two Commies for the price of One
#TamponTim
Civil War in Britain?
I’ll say one thing, that Starmer is one ignorant smarmy cunt ![]()
Open House 7/29/24
After the Fagolymics opening ceremony , I decided I wasn’t going to watch any of it. Seems a lot of other people had the same idea. Enough that some advertisers dropped out enough to get the Olympic committee’s attention and for them to issue this half assed apology.
https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/1817683936182518207
After seeing this whole debacle, enough is enough, frankly I hope Islam takes over western Europe, at least they know the proper way to deal with mentally unstable sodomites and pedo’s ![]()
Joe is out, now let the fun begin
Trump wins another one
Actually, Justice has emerged victorious but Judge Cannon’s ruling will make the Biden DoJ shit their drawers.
The Left Always Preferred The French Revolution To The American — UPDATED
Our Friend Ed Bonderenka interviewed Daniel Greenfield on his new book. Catch the broadcast or the podcast.
I always knew world history better than American History. I was misled on what I did know. I bet I’m not alone. It’s a fair bet this interview will provide all of you with startling new material. It appears “evil never gives up” still holds water.
For reasons unknown, the display of the twitter file has left off Ed’s introduction. I’m adding it as an update.
Saturday at 2pm Eastern, Ed Bonderenka interviews Daniel Greenfield, the author of Domestic Enemies: The Founding Fathers’ Fight Against the Left, which came out in April.
This book fills in some holes in the historical narrative left empty by many educators who would rather not talk about them. But Daniel Greenfield fills those holes!
Listen in WAAM 1600 AM or https://waamradio.com/player/
Did you know the Left wanted to ruin George Washington? No wonder our Left lets their radicals tear down his statue. Tune in Sat, July 6, hear it from Daniel Greenfield. https://t.co/X3TENWjUY0 pic.twitter.com/0Wep7iNTer
— Pascal Fervor (@PascalFervor) July 6, 2024
CLICK HERE FOR THOSE WHO MISSED THE BROADCAST OR WANT TO HEAR IT AGAIN.
Open House 7/4/24
The Story of Jake “McNasty” McNiece Airborne Legend ![]()
This is Big
SCOTUS just rolled back the most destructive tool belonging to the administrative state-
From the article-
The APA “specifies that courts, not agencies, will decide all relevant questions of law arising on review of agency action—even those involving ambiguous laws—and set aside any such action inconsistent with the law as they interpret it.” Roberts continued. “And it prescribes no deferential standard for courts to employ in answering those legal questions.”
“The deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with the APA,” the justices said. “In the decades between the enactment of the APA and this Court’s decision in Chevron, courts generally continued to review agency interpretations of the statutes they administer by independently examining each statute to determine its meaning.”
“Chevron, decided in 1984 by a bare quorum of six Justices, triggered a marked departure from the traditional approach,” the majority determined. “Neither Chevron nor any subsequent decision of this Court attempted to reconcile its framework with the APA.”
“Chevron defies the command of the APA that the reviewing court—not the agency whose action it reviews—is to decide all relevant questions of law and interpret statutory provisions,” Roberts found. “It requires a court to ignore, not follow, the reading the court would have reached had it exercised its independent judgment as required by the APA.”