The headline reads:
‘Half of Britain ‘would vote for far-Right parties if they gave up violence’ ‘
Which, of course implies that the two organisations mentioned are both “far right” and violent. Even though the fascist UAF and muslims are the main sources of violence in street demonstrations.
‘Almost half the country would back a far-Right party if they gave up violence, an astonishing new poll revealed today.
A total of 48 per cent said that they would support a group that vowed to crack down on immigration and Islamic extremists.
They would also restrict the building of mosques and order the flag of St George or the Union Jack be flown on all public buildings.
Anti-racism campaigners said the findings were a clear sign that Britain’s mainstream parties were losing touch with many voters on the issue of race.There has been a recent wave of support for extremists such as the English Defence League and the British National Party.
This has nothing to do with race and everything to do with defending a culture and a way of life and there is NO justification  whatsoever for labelling these people as extremists. If they’re “extreme” then so are 48% of the English.
….In one of the most revealing questions, pollsters Populus asked people if they would back a party that ‘wants to defend the English, create an English parliament, control immigration and challenge Islamic extremism’.
A total of 48 per cent said they would either ‘definitely support’ or ‘consider supporting’ a party with such an agenda, if it shunned violence and fascist imagery.
“Violence and fascist imagery”? There is neither violence nor fascist imagery in the EDL at least. How about the violent, fascist image that muslim activists routinely display on the street of London and other European cities–the black battle flag of islam? It seems that gets a free pass from the slimeball who penned this “news” item….
The results will alarm both PM David Cameron and Labour leader Ed Miliband, who are worried about the rise of right-wing extremists.
In the 12 months to last September, 238,950 migrants were allowed into Britain, the highest figure since records began.
Get this…..Cameron was elected because people hoped and believed that he would turn back the efforts of the Labour Party to utterly change the face of Britain–yet those efforts have reached record levels under his government. No wonder the results will “alarm” the government–the cat’s out of the bag.
Sixty per cent of people thought immigration had been ‘a bad thing’ for England, against 40 per cent who said it had been ‘good’.
Thirty-four per cent said immigration should be stopped permanently or until the economy improved. The report also found opposition comes from all races, not just ‘white Britons’.
But only white Britons are racist for opposing it…
‘And 52 per cent of Britons agree that ‘Muslims create problems in the UK’.
Searchlight director Nick Lowles told the Sunday Mirror: ‘The harsh truth is we are in danger of losing touch with the public on race, immigration and multiculturalism.’ ‘
Very clever. And very dishonest.
Searchlight is nothing more than a leftist propaganda outfit with some very dubious bedmates.
The determination to paint opponents of mass immigration and islam as racists and thugs demonstrates perfectly that Western governments are bent on imposing their policies on us in the teeth of real resistance and the propaganda machine is in overdrive. But that may only work for so long….if a spasm of revulsion and anger sweeps through Europe no force on earth will be able to control it.

‘One of our Swedish contacts sent this video about an incident at a public swimming pool when eleven- and twelve-year-old girls were attacked and raped by Muslim immigrants. He included this note:

There are a lot of stories about what Sweden calls “alone refugee children” who immigrate in large numbers to Sweden. They are, however, most often not children but around seventeen or older. They lie about their age and throw their IDs away. They are not “alone”, either since many later bring their families with them. And they aren’t refugees either, for that matter.
In any case, there have been many reports of violence by these immigrants (mostly from Somalia and Afghanistan), and the latest incident may be seen below. This hasn’t been reported by mainstream media yet but… I think the story is true, especially after considering that there have been other rapes at that bath house before….’            Gates of Vienna

Australia, too is importing numbers of these “refugee children” whose ages cannot be verified and a little birdie tells Wabbit that 500 Somalis have been resettled in Alice Springs, where they’re now running drug trafficking and prostitution rackets.

Galahs all over the lawn, no noisy people and the beer’s cold. The perfect prelude to a day’s work.

Ecstasy does not damage brain, robust study says
How sceptics are frozen out: the Antarctic example
Boat children key part of racket, says Philip Ruddock
IPCC liars
“To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.” Abraham Lincoln.
‘The Nanny State – From Mad To Malignant’       Wolf Howling

‘In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV Friday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said President Barack Obama’s decision not to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage law has sparked a constitutional crisis as he has directly violated his constitutional duties by arbitrarily suspending a law.
Gingrich for the first time raised the specter of Obama’s removal from office, noting that, if a “President Sarah Palin” had taken a similar action, there would have been immediate calls for her impeachment.
Obama Attorney General Eric Holder said on Wednesday that the administration will not defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the courts, which has banned recognition of same-sex marriage for 15 years. President Clinton signed the act into law in 1996.
Obama’s decision to forego a legal defense of the law has caused a firestorm of anger from conservative groups.
Gingrich slammed Obama for his decision, telling Newsmax that he is not a “one-person Supreme Court” and his decision sets a “very dangerous precedent” that must not be allowed to stand.
…….“First of all, he campaigned in favor of [the law]. He is breaking his word to the American people,” Gingrich says.
“Second, he swore an oath on the Bible to become president that he would uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the United States. He is not a one-person Supreme Court. The idea that we now have the rule of Obama instead of the rule of law should frighten everybody.” ‘

while campaigning in 2008:
“Do they (other candidates) have it in their gut? Do they have a track record of standing along side you on picket lines? Do they have a track record of going after companies that aren’t letting you organize? Do they have a track record of voting the right way – but also helping you organize to build more and more power?  “We (Obama and Unions) built political power on the south side of Chicago – and now the time for us to do it (build political power) across this country. We are going to paint the nation purple with SEIU.”

‘American combat troops will get sensitivity training directly on the battlefield about the military’s new policy on gays instead of waiting until they return to home base in the United States, the senior enlisted man in Afghanistan said Thursday. The Pentagon is launching an extensive force-wide program to ease the process of integrating open homosexuals into the ranks, including into close-knit fighting units…’   source

We’re screwed. That senior brass would tolerate this simply beggars belief and demonstrates perfectly where their loyalties reside–and it’s not with the troops.

‘Nearly all boat arrivals legitimate refugees’

The story:

‘ALMOST all asylum-seekers arriving in Australia waters over the past three years have had their refugee status applications approved, adding weight to claims that people-smugglers are taking advantage of the federal government’s immigration policies.’

Not quite the same thing, is it? And most of those applications have been approved because the Immigration Dept. simply cannot verify their claims.

‘The other day I needed to go to the emergency room. Not wanting to sit there for 4 hours, I put on my Magic Green Hat. When I went into the E.R., I noticed that 3/4 of the people got up and left.”
via Gates of Vienna

Continue reading →

‘In her own words, just five days before the August 21 poll, she told Channel 10: “There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.”
In case anyone was possibly in any doubt, she repeated the line – “I rule out a carbon tax” – in The Australian on the day before the election.
Should Australians have believed her? Well, in her own words, election promises are meant to be honoured.
“I think when you go to an election and you give a promise to the Australian people, you should do everything in your power to honour that promise,” she told ABC broadcaster Jon Faine on March 20, 2009.’

Piers Akerman