would a ‘self-destruct’ feature be too difficult to design?

Posted on by

‘U.S. drone likely in Iran’s hands is thought to still be intact and would be major gain for country, source says’
…”This is a big prize in terms of technology,” a senior U.S. military source told Fox News.’

10 thoughts on “would a ‘self-destruct’ feature be too difficult to design?”

  1. Can’t be that hard; Labour have had one since the days of Helen Clark. Perhaps they should look at consulting rather than politics.

  2. Oh that was probably an early Christmas gift from Obama to the Chicoms :evil:

    Ya,really would some Thermite really be that difficult?

    • Yep. A charge which required a “keep alive” message every-say-60 minutes to prevent it from detonating.

      • 60 minutes? You couldn’t do that. Just imagine if one did happen to go off the reservation and find itself in the middle of the desert. Some raghead might find it and load it onto his camel, just in time for it to go …

        Never mind.

  3. Michael Savage is saying it is an inside job. The diversity of our military is more important than security and more. If Savage says it, I am inclined to believe it.

      • There is a certain perverse reality to it. Savage said that if you questioned the arabs in our system or others of like mind that it would be at once called racial profiling, an oh so bad thing nowadays. Four more years will kill America and ensure its fundamental transformation.

  4. On an episode of ‘The West Wing’, the downed drone (in Russia) has precisely that feature.

    Who would have thought liberal artists would be wiser on defence than the real life US military?

Comments are closed.