Open house

You have a ‘suitcase nuke’ and an absolutely foolproof, deniable way of detonating it in Mecca or Medina. Would you do it?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

53 Responses to Open house

  1. Darin says:

    Depends,is the Hajj on? :popcorn

    • KG says:

      I do believe it is.

      • Darin says:

        Oh,then definitely Mecca,gotta have them grouped you know.

        On the other hand The UN might be a better pick since that’s where the bastards get their funding and where most of the appeasers hang out. :popcorn

        • KG says:

          Too right.

          • Darin says:

            The UPS gods where nice to me Friday in delivering something longish and made from wood and steel to my FFL dealer.

            A gallon of Mineral spirits should remove the Cosmo-line.The rifle,sling,cleaning kit and bayonet including shipping and transfer fee $159 Vasili Zaitsev would be proud. :popcorn

            Now if I just had some German infantry to try it out on :twisted:

  2. Katie says:

    Get 2 more suitcases and destroy Mecca, Medina and the land in between. Thus getting rid of the whole problem at once.

    :cheers

    BTW: Where is the beer? :cheers

    • KG says:

      It’s a serious question, Katie. (the one in the post, not the beer).
      I’m curious to know what people think they’d do.

      • The Gantt Guy says:

        A serious answer is that most people would choose to not drop that hammer. Most people can’t bring themselves to confront the evil that is Islam, and the threat it represents to the entire world (and that isn’t hyperbole). Even if they did understand most people simply couldn’t bring themselves to do it.

        I’d find someone whose daughter was gang-raped by the savages and ask him the same question.

      • Katie says:

        Then again you can forget the nuke(s) and do a major bombing run over the area dropping pig’s parts, bacon and pig’s blood. It would work wonders.

  3. KG says:

    I agree with that, Gantt. It’s easy enough to talk blithely about killing, but in truth very, very few people can actually do it in cold blood.
    I’d certainly detonate the bomb after leafleting the cities 24 hrs beforehand. The object being to destroy their sacred symbols.

  4. oswald bastable says:

    Yes, I would.

  5. KG says:

    If they didn’t pull their heads in after that, then so would I.

  6. Seneca III says:

    If it is to be done at all ground zero must be at Mecca, at the height of the Hadj with the wind blowing towards due north. It’s only just under 500 miles for the fallout to travel to Medinah. That would be a good starter for ten. :gunner

  7. Brian Smaller says:

    If Israel is attacked with a WMD then I think this discussion may be moot. Masada wont fall again.

  8. Fairfacts Media says:

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/blaming_our_troops_gsNkgSOnejhkmabM2KA6TI

    Afghanistan needs nuking too but Obama also must be punished for allowing/imposing this.

  9. Darin says:

    I watched the first episode of the new ABC series Last Resort last night.

    The show has an interesting plot,to me anyway.It starts off following the crew of a US Navy Boomer(ballistic missile submarine) who is ordered to let four Nukes fly against Pakistan only the orders didn’t come through normal channels and they decide to confirm before launch.

    I won’t ruin it for anybody who may want to watch it,but at the end of the first episode the Captain of the Sub and his crew are on a small Island that features a NATO early warning station around which he has setup a 200mile naval exclusion zone in order to defend it and his crew.It ends with the Captain and his XO discussing restarting Liberty and what America stands for on that Island :popcorn

    http://beta.abc.go.com/shows/last-resort

  10. Contempt says:

    Heard a different view being that suicidal Iran takes two nukes into two US ports and blows them. This destroys all of America as millions living in port cities flee to the interior without cars, food, water, phones. Iran, if we do not totally destroy islam countries, pops Israel later but Israel has no choice to hit first. The US public demands massives retribution and no politician can stop the need for a giant hit on the muslim countries.

  11. Yokel says:

    I’d also choose Mecca at the height of the Hajj. They normally kill quite a few “pilgrims” during the festivities, so they might not notice straight away!

  12. mawm says:

    It’s like one of these ‘ethics’ scenarios where you have to make choices. :roll:

    So if I was walking alongside a rail line with my mother-in-law and there were some really cute kids playing on the line further down the tracks and suddenly a run away train appeared. If I were to push the MIL in the path of the train, I could save the kids……Sorry, KG, what was the question again? :mrgreen:

    • KG says:

      :whoop I love those ethical conundrums…..the answer in every case is that the MIL is expendable, but thrashing around looking for the possible exceptions is fun.

  13. Mark.V. says:

    The muzzies rioted around the world, destroyng property and killing people because one silly little movie. Immagine what they would if their holiest places were destroyed. Mind you the temptation would be hard to resist.

  14. KG says:

    “the objective is to bring the enemy to battle. And destroy him”

    • oswald bastable says:

      Such was my reasoning for a little neutron therapy. To irrevocably commit to an all-out, no holds barred showdown- which is better than slowly being nibbled to death, as we are now.

  15. mawm says:

    Here’s a surprise……………

    New Zealand university degrees are the most worthless in the developed world, an international report reveals.

    I’m pretty sure they are not referring to those degrees which are actually useful like medicine, veterinary science, engineering, achitecture, accountancy, etc. :roll:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10837419

    • KG says:

      :mrgreen: :mrgreen: amazed, I am!
      Perhaps they could amalgamate all the bullshit degrees under the one heading: ‘Recycling Jargon and Buzzphrases’?

  16. KG says:

    Hmmmm….from your link:
    “The Government says it has already cut the number of poor-quality courses by at least 15 per cent, and wants to reduce or eliminate fees for lower-level qualifications – because students who complete them don’t make any money out of their qualification.”

    By “reduce or eliminate fees” they mean pass the cost on to the bloody taxpayer!

    • mawm says:

      Those kind of students don’t repay their loans anyway………and they just become perrenial students (and student activists) and get loan after loan, etc.

  17. mistress mara says:

    Nuking the enemy? “Hallelujah,” not to be confused with Fallujah, ” ya had it comin to ya!!” What is the name of that song? But we won’t of course, plus it would give me too much pleasure and we can’t be having any of that at my tima life. Mr Poretto’s comment on this was geared to a higher plane than my measly satisfaction level. Jeez, I’d still love to see it though. ;-)

  18. KG says:

    “..Mr Poretto’s comment on this..”
    I don’t recall seeing it, Mara. :sad:

  19. Richard says:

    Definitely vapourise that black rock. I’m sure I read somewhere that islam will exist as long as their graven idol does, so taking out the idol is a no-brainer.

  20. Kris K says:

    Lets be clear, and I’m surprised this hasn’t happened yet, if/when the Islamists are suitably equiped I believe at least one major U.S. city will be nuked into oblivion.

    To take out Mecca and/or Medina is simply a precautionary measure to prevent what must surely be, if left unchecked, an inevitable outcome for the West.

    Just like the WWII Japanese regime that didn’t know the meaning of surrender, so too is an ascendant Islam – live by the sword, die by the sword.

  21. mistress mara says:

    Think back KG. I’m sure you will find it. We both commented on this topic.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      :whoop

      “Almost seven in 10 Aucklanders in a Herald street poll said they were comfortable with the ethnic diversity in Auckland, and 72 per cent said they have a close friend or friends outside their own ethnic group.”

      A Jafa’s way of saying “I don’t hate black people. I like black people. I have a friend who’s black!”

      • The Gantt Guy says:

        And what’s the deal. Spidy? You have a google alert on the words “Paul Spoonley”? Or are you just stalking him? :popcorn

        • octagongrappler says:

          No a customer gave me a free paper on a job this morning :mrgreen:

          I opened it up and arrrghhhhhhhh!!!! :censor

  22. KG says:

    I was going to post on it this morning, Grappler, but was overcome with the “aaah, what’s the effing use” bug..
    ‘White faces will soon be a minority
    New stats indicate white Europeans could soon lose majority status in Auckland as the combined population of Asians, Pacific Islanders and Maori increases.
    ….Auckland Chinese Community Centre chairman Arthur Loo, a local-born Chinese, counts himself among those who would be “uncomfortable” if there were more Asians, Pacific and Maori than Pakeha in Auckland.
    “I wouldn’t want Pakeha to be the minority. I think we as New Zealanders have got to acknowledge what the founding peoples of New Zealand were, and it’s Maori and people from the United Kingdom,” Mr Loo said.
    He said Auckland should remain a city that kept New Zealand’s “Maori-European heritage”.
    “I mean all societies evolve, but I certainly won’t want to see the Anglo-Saxon or the English culture subjugated in any way because they, in a large part, have made what is New Zealand and that’s why we’re here,” Mr Loo said.
    “They were responsible for building New Zealand to what it is today, and other people come and we take advantage of that.”
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10837589
    Embracing ethnic diversity: Melting-pot reality okay with New Zealanders
    Almost seven in 10 Aucklanders in a Herald street poll said they were comfortable with the ethnic diversity in Auckland, and 72 per cent said they have a close friend or friends outside their own ethnic group.
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10837572

    Seven in 10 Aucklanders in an AUCKLAND street poll! Where Europeans are already outnumbered! That’s some great methodology.
    And I see the only person to speak up against the multiculti propaganda is Chinese. Well, good on him, but I can’t escape the feeling that one now has to be non-European in order to have one’s anti-cultural genocide opinions heard.

    (and their own damn poll on the same page says that 60% of Kiwis are either ‘not really’ or ‘definitely not’ comfortable with Auckland’s changing ethnic mix!)

  23. mistress mara says:

    What was the ethnicity of the pollers? Chances are they were largely non-white. Face to face, most whites will not tell an asian, just doing their low paid polling job, to bugger off back to asialand. I, for one, don’t trust those stats.

  24. The Gantt Guy says:

    So, as of last night, there’s a new GanttMobile.

    She’s kinda like the British Royal Family. British badge and styling, nice to look at and (judging from the look of some of the younger Royals) a great ride. A little emotionally unstable (or so I’m told from the reviews I’ve read online).

    But inside, she’s mostly German.

    :shock: :whoop

  25. KG says:

    :wtf Oh no! Wabbit had a succession of MG’s as a youth and I don’t recall any one of them ever being reliable. Never mind the German content..they probably set aside the Monday cars to be MG-badged. :mrgreen:
    And what’s with the soft top? You planning to use it as a mobile spa in rainy NZ?

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      I’ve always wanted a soft-top, and at $4,500 it was too good an opportunity to pass up. I can’t afford the softie I *really* want, or even my second choice, but so far (total driving time: ~23 minutes) I’m pretty happy with the MG. Besides, Mrs Gantt can’t drive a stick (stick-shift car :oops: ), so it’s definitely *my* car!

      And, the top goes up and down in about 20 seconds, so all I have to do when it rains is stop and put the top up. Then 10 minutes later when the rain stops, I can stop again and put it back down. Then 10 minutes later …

      Incidentally, we had our first episode of “sideways rain” here yesterday. Miss Six was fascinated – she’d never seen the rain going sideways before.

  26. KG says:

    I got a wooden spoon for my birthday Gantt, so pay the anti-MG comments no mind. :grin:
    Enjoy it.
    No sideways rain, even in Melbourne??? I wonder how she’ll enjoy snow? That’d be fun to watch.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      There’s definitely an anti-Brit theme to your car comments, KG, and from what I’ve read online I can understand why. But I can’t afford a German or even an Italian, and I need something to get me to the ferry and back each day. So it was a choice between a Toyota Corolla or the MG. No contest, really!

      And no, we never had sideways rain. We had some pretty decent hail at times, but water in both its incendiary states tended to hurtle straight towards earth rather than at an angle.

      Miss Six has seen what she thinks is snow; it “snowed” a few times in the Dandenongs when we lived in Melbourne, so she thinks she has it covered. I’m expecting a pretty spectacular reaction the first time she sees some nice, deep, hard-packed powder! But that said, I’m really looking forward to summer, since where we’ve bought we have something like 12 beaches within 15 minutes, and this is the view from my new front deck!