Boston bombing

Boston The little girl on the left lost a leg. Her brother, on the right, was killed. Every ratbastard politician who supports importing muslims into the West, every apologist for the filthy death cult responsible for this atrocity (and very many more) shares the responsibility for this obscenity.

May you rot in hell, alongside the perpetrators.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Boston bombing

  1. Ronbo says:

    …and don’t ask me to feel sorry for the “innocent” Muzbot children and wives who get killed when American Hellfire missiles take out their terrorist husbands and fathers :!: :evil:

    “What comes around, goes around, AND I DON’T CARE IF YOU ARE AN AMERICAN CITIZEN!” :evil:

  2. Darin says:

    That little boy and girl are worth more to me than the entire muslim world.If I had my way muslims would look toward mecca just in time to see the flash :evil:

  3. Ronbo says:

    @Darin:

    I think at the end of the day it will come to that, as the Muslims are on a Global Jihad against World Civilization – and the five largest (and very different) countries on the planet – China, Russia, America, India and the European Union – have only one thing in common – they are under siege by Islam.

    At some point the Muslims will go a terror attack too far, or cut off the oil to start World War III and a grand alliance of very pissed off crusaders will rip Islam to pieces.

  4. Oswald Bastable says:

    The sooner, the better! :evil:

  5. The Gantt Guy says:

    Ronbo, if:

    • 9/11 wasn’t a terror attack too far,
    • if 7/7 wasn’t a terror attack too far,
    • if the attacks on Australians in Bali weren’t a terror attack too far,
    • if the Mumbai hotel atrocity wasn’t a terror attack too far,
    • if Ben-Fucking-ghazi wasn’t a terror attack too far,
    • if the Boston marathon bombing wasn’t a terror attack too far,
    • if none of the other 20,000-plus attacks that muslims have perpetrated since 9/11 were a terror attack too fat

    what will be a terror attack too far? Do we wait until Iran provides one of its friends with a dirty bomb to set off in some random Western city? Will that do it? (Answer: no, of course not. They’d just wheel poor old Cassius Clay out again to tell everyone not to worry, i-Slam is the religion of peace).

    Sorry, but if your hoped-for and dreamed-of WWIII was going to happen, it would have happened by now.

    The fact it hasn’t is yet more evidence of the Left’s 50-year war on adulthood. The perpetual infantilisation of the citizenry.

    As children are rocked to sleep with lullabies, and told not to worry about the monsters under the bed and in the cupboard, the grown-up children in the West are rocked to sleep with the constant, reassuring refrain of “a tiny minority, not representative of the vast majority”, and “it’s the religion of peace”, and are told not to worry about the monsters under the bed and in the cupboard, for they are imaginary.

    The only hope – and I do mean the *only* hope – for western civilisation is if King Barry comes for Americans’ guns. That is the only spark I can see anywhere on the horizon which might become a bushfire. And even then, the chances of it spreading outside of America’s borders are slim-to-bugger-all.

  6. KG says:

    What Gantt said.
    There is no no outrage that the battery hens will regard as a declaration of war, a call to arms.
    We in the West have largely lost our manhood.

  7. thor42 says:

    Agreed, KG.

    I agree with Darin too. There *is* one way that such a thing could happen too – if Syria (or another country thereabouts) tried to attack Israel with chem weapons.

    Apparently, Israel has quietly put the word out to the Islamic countries in the Middle East that if one of them attacks Israel with a WMD, the retribution will be against ALL M.E. Islamic countries.

    It’s to the shame of the world that Israel would have to be attacked in order for that to happen.

  8. KG says:

    And a further shame that Israel stands virtually alone, Thor.

  9. thor42 says:

    Agreed, KG.

    If Israel *were* attacked, my ideal scenario for them would go like this –

    * A few missiles are launched from Iran towards Israel.
    * All of the missiles are intercepted and destroyed by Israel’s Arrow-2 and Arrow-3 anti-missile system.
    * Israel responds by nuking all Islamic countries within 5,000 miles. (It wouldn’t even surprise me if they had Dolphin subs off *Pakistan*, just in case they wanted to take out the Pakis…)

    Ok, this scenario does still leave Indonesia (with 200 million or so Muzzbots), so it’s not perfect, but anyway……

  10. KG says:

    It’ll do just fine. :mrgreen:

  11. Darin says:

    Thor,think what would happen if those events did occur considering the current appeasenic governments in the rest of the world.

    If Israel were attacked and she rightfully defended herself which we know she would.The response from the rest of the world would be a pile on of condemnation not against the muslims,but against Israel.

    “Behold, I (God) will make Jerusalem
    a cup of trembling (anger, fear)
    unto ALL the people (nations) round about . . .”
    (Zechariah 12:2)

    And all the nations of the world shall come against Israel in the valley of Megiddo…….

  12. KG says:

    The best thing Israel could do, imho, is distribute her nukes on submarines, so a strike on Israel itself – no matter how destructive – would guarantee retaliation.
    A return to the MAD doctrine.

  13. thor42 says:

    @Darin – “…the response from the rest of the world would be a pile on of condemnation not against the muslims,but against Israel.”
    Yeah. On thinking about it, that’s true, Darin.
    How blind the world is that (in boxing terms) they only *ever* see the *second* hit, not the first.

    @KG – I agree. Distributing the nukes on subs would be an excellent strategy.
    If the info on the Wikipedia article on Dolphin subs is to be believed, they may already be doing this (which would be great).
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolphin-class_submarine

  14. KG says:

    Cry me a river#331:
    “The gulag that shames the West”
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10882986

    No, what shames the West is that these bastards weren’t summarily executed. What shames the West is Western “journalists” who are no more than muslim sympathisers.
    I have just a one word response to these cunts:
    BESLAN.

  15. The Gantt Guy says:

    Beslan? Oh, you mean when Chechen freedom fighters (mistakenly) took shelter in a school to hide from Russian security forces (cue doom-music) who were persecuting them? When the Russians blew up the school and all those poor children, just to get the freedom fighters?

  16. KG says:

    Yeah, that’s the one. Been taking lessons from the NYT, have you?

  17. The Gantt Guy says:

    Just pointing out that there’s no atrocity these animals commit that can’t be spun. It’s yet another reason why there will be no armed uprising against either the political establishment or i-Slam, because in the case of both, their atrocities are swept down the memory hole or subjected to a Newspeak reinterpretation.

  18. KG says:

    Yep, exactly so.