Police protect your daughters? Not in NZ

Police criticised for not pursuing boys animals who got girls drunk, sexually assaulted them then boasted about it on facebook’
This filth looks very Middle Eastern to me. It’ll be interesting to see what their names are….
Update: Nope, they’re not M.E. imports. Just equivalent scum.
UPDATE II:  Terry Wallbank has an excellent post on this.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

47 Responses to Police protect your daughters? Not in NZ

  1. Findalis says:

    Would castration be too severe a punishment?

  2. the conservative says:

    “”This is gang rape, full stop,” said NZ Labour’s women’s affairs spokeswoman, Carol Beaumont.”

    Labour endorses importing the filth, then complain about, but then continue importing more of them?

  3. dondiego says:

    I’ve said it before, the klukkers would’ve done the rope + tree some assembly required equation.

    If the cops knew about it why weren’t those maggots on the next plane back to their own country :?: -Is it shades of the rape incident on the steps of Breviks parliament the week before he did what he did? Security guards (watching on camera)there used the zoom-in instead of sorting it.

    I’d like to know where these sub-humans fit in on the benevolent sexism scale.

    Oh wait, since they’re not whites it’s culturally relative because kiwi children can buy booze and get abortions without daddy knowing.

  4. Cadwallader says:

    I’m sorry to say that the perpetrators are, I am led to believe, from families and interests closer to Auckland’s “establishment” than off a boat from the Middle East. The police may be being subject to pressures here but it is early days yet. Watch and wait.

  5. Lara says:

    Next you will be saying its the fault of Helen Clark.
    Last time I looked, quisling Key was in charge.

  6. ZenTiger says:

    The issue here is that police are supposedly powerless to do anything about serious law breaking: rape, deliberately drugging people, and a host of other offences. It’s interesting how you can break the law, but then if there are no victims around to come forward, the Police can say they are powerless.

    Powerless to act on probable cause. Powerless to setup a sting. Powerless to scare the crap out of these self-confessed brutes by running them through the system and putting up a case in front of the judge. A waste of money to get no-where? I doubt it. The police seem to have no trouble fining people based on a blurry photo from a speed camera, but a Facebook Group full of evidence defeats them.

    All they’ve managed to do is ensure those animals stop advertising what they are doing. Brilliant.

    • KG says:

      “The police seem to have no trouble fining people based on a blurry photo from a speed camera, but a Facebook Group full of evidence defeats them.”
      Exactly.
      Suppose for a moment the victims were around six years old..the police could still use the excuse that they “need a victim to come forward and lay a complaint”?
      This is absurd. Worse than absurd, it’s an effing scandalous dereliction of duty for which the bastards ought to be sued.

      • Flashman says:

        Nailed it KG.

      • Cadwallader says:

        You’re probably right, but don’t fall into the Kiwi trap of losing focus…the fact is that the police may have stuffed up, but the kernel is that these little pricks deserve the true wrath. Perhaps vigilante justice would be the best type here? A good and sustained kicking before and/or after being sodomised?

        • The Gantt Guy says:

          Only if they’re sodomised using the Clint Rickards method (I believe one of the little shits’ fathers is an old mate and collaborator of Rickards) – with a police baton. :evil:

    • Richard says:

      I bet the police would take action if these bastards started turning up dead, as they so richly deserve. Scum and filth.

  7. Lara says:

    where is my comment?

  8. Brown says:

    The house this goes on in is known as are the offenders. Why not post a pic of it and them somewhere? Like a Tui billboard.

    Part of the problem is the liberal establishments desire to see kids sexually active at a younger than sensible age. This is apparent at places like Vibe (I recall) in Upper Hutt where 13 year olds can get the pill from cool youngish people in hip T shirts. I’d like to think a conservative govt would stomp on this abuse but where the heck do you find a conservative govt in the west today?

  9. Flashman says:

    One is the son of a plod.

    Nothing to see here. Move along. This alleged offending is an isolated incident.

    Now try going 5 kays over the speed limit on an empty road and see what happens…

    Typical NZ.

    By the way, did anyone here order a taxi to Piha?

  10. mawm says:

    Rape is a criminal offence. If there is evidence that rape occurred, despite no complaints being brought to the police, the offenders must be prosecuted. Of course, silly me, worldwide police have stopped prosecuting men who rape young girls.

    Two names so far –
    Joseph Levall Parker, son of Hollywood actor Anthony Ray Parker, and Beraiah Hales.

  11. KG says:

    Excellent. Wabbit would donate to that.
    ‘Another vigilante group has sprung up on Facebook promising $4000 for footage of “Roast Busters” members “getting hidings.”…’

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11151474

  12. Flashman says:

    Here we go again…

    A culturally enriching “refugee” brings good cheer to NZ…

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/9363476/Port-Hills-groper-admits-eight-indecencies

    Love the fact that this a-hole gets nice cozy name suppression.

  13. KG says:

    ‘..Judge Farish indicated she would need to be convinced if final suppression was to be granted at the sentencing. The defence has cited disproportionately serious effects on the man and his family. ‘

    “disproportionately serious”? Why? In what way? Says who?
    I detest secrecy in the administration of justice, mainly because a select few get to define what constitutes justice.
    And that drags it further away from community consensus, without which there cannot be a respect for the law.

    • Flashman says:

      Such is reality in a post-democratic society where accountability-free apparatchiks rule.

  14. Tom says:

    Now the hopeless police are warning the vigilantes to lay off.

    • KG says:

      What we need is about six months worth of real, ruthless vigilantism citizen-initiated justice.
      The police can go back to their social work afterwards.

  15. KG says:

    ‘Violence will not be tolerated’ – police
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11151911

    Funny, that–the police watched a group boasting about raping young girls for two years.
    They tolerated that just fine. :evil:

    And I see the Smirking Key Klown is repeating the bullshit about the difficulty of bringing them to justice unless a thirteen year-old came forward and laid a complaint.
    Better release all those people jailed for murdering babies in NZ then, because it’s highly unlikely a six month old baby ever laid a complaint about being beaten and burned and tortured to death.
    Let’s see….stupefaction and rape and so forth can’t be prosecuted because there’s no complainant, and many, many offenders can’t be named and tried in a real court because they’re “juveniles”.
    Right.That’s halved the workload of police already, and made the crime stats look much better.

  16. Tom says:

    The police are actually very busy checking vehicle registrations,wof,s and if the driver has had a stubby too many.

  17. Flashman says:

    Looking at the breaking news around this police fiasco it seems like mr plod is well and truly on the back foot.

    Now that Key has stepped into the arena, the political fall-out from this staggering display of police lassitude and ineptitude could crack his dream run.

    Safer communities together? Tui advert.

    • KG says:

      I’ve been trying to get a feel for which it is, Flashman–lassitude or ineptitude. Perhaps it’s both, coupled with a fear of making a career-ending move in a stiflingly PC society.
      But that doesn’t quite fly…these days, almost anything is ok if it’s “for the children”.
      Baffling.

  18. Mathew says:

    I agree with what the other commenters said about the police, it really seems piss-weak for them to say they can’t do much.

    I will add this too, where are the parents of these girls who were boozed up and got into this mess, why are they allowing them to go out and get into trouble like this.

    I remember recently reading about a leftie blogger who said she would tell her daughters that they should not get drunk and drugged up because it would make them easy targets for the predators out there. She got herself a heap of abuse from a lot of people.

    There’s a strong element of stupidity in the populace on many such matters these days and quite a few people need to wake up to themselves.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      heh. Great minds, Mathew (your second para above). I wrote this at Terry Wallbank’s blog this morning:

      “There’s so much wrong here it’s hard to know where to start.

      First: where are the fathers? That these girls were, at least in some sense, knowing (if not willing) participants in this activity indicates that their fathers have utterly failed in the only job they’ve ever had wihch really matters: raising their daughters to have self respect, dignity and to expect young “men” to treat them the same. That they willingly participated in this activity (and there’s at least some evidence which suggests that at least some of these girls knew what was going to happen and went along with it), indicates their fathers have raised girls who have no self-respect (but probably an over-abundance of self-esteem), no dignity and no ability to discern right from wrong.

      As a minimum (and this is, at best, an act of coming late to the party), these fathers should be banding together and making it that there is no such thing as a safe place for these animals to hide.

      Secondly, where are the fathers? These boys’ fathers should be equally ashamed. That Anthony Ray Parker refuses to speak with the media about the acts perpetrated by his son tells us a lot of why the son has turned out this way.

      Thirdly, why would we expect anything else from the Quisling Key? He is a jellyfish. That he thinks a new cyber-bullying law will have any effect whatever proves the useless prick just.doesn’t.get.it. A Leader would have had the Police Commissioner into his office for a debrief and – if appropriate – a thorough dressing-down. If there are problems with the law (and I fail to see how in any rational world, boys who brag on video about stupefying and raping under-age girls cannot be prosecuted), then the law needs to be fixed. One of the three legitimate reasons for government to exist is to pass laws which protect individual liberty of citizens. Manifestly, the government has failed in this duty, if the law does not provide redress in this situation.

      Fourthly, why on earth would anyone be surprised about the police threatening action against vigilantes? The are obviously unable to protect young girls from these animals, but heaven forbid anybody else should be able to stop them!

      Bastards, the lot of them.”

  19. KG says:

    I remember the abuse of that blogger, Mathew. Simply for offering commonsense advice. :shock:
    Leftards really are insane.

  20. mawm says:

    So the police lied!

    Four complaints had been laid by girls of between 13 and 15 years old. This was in 2011 and 2012…………….and nothing was done!

    Heads should roll………..and those boys must charged with rape. Nothing but gaol time would be acceptable. I hope they get to share a room with a 150kg inmate called “Butch”. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_heart.gif

    • anon4now says:

      Police lying? I’ll be darned :?: :!:

      I have it on good authority that large lifer maoris get a special tingle when they see the likes of those lads. :shock:

      Enough to transfer to segregation so as to be closer to the object of their affections. Both “Butch” and Sondancer have social worker probation types to help.http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cry.gif

      The deciding factor might be father plod- do any prison guards or heirachy know him? Is he remembered fondly? Or otherwise.http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  21. Cadwallader says:

    O/T Does any one of your readers know where US citizens sit on the continuation of capital punishment? There must be a number of polls on this. I expect that the temperament for capital punishment differs between states. Texas would favor it ahead of (say) Maine.

    • KG says:

      It would be interesting to see a breakdown by state, Cad.

    • Darin says:

      Here is the Gallup poll data on where we stand as a group.
      http://www.gallup.com/poll/144284/Support-Death-Penalty-Cases-Murder.aspx

      State by state would be hard to pin down as 32 states have the death penalty and the rest don’t.
      Of the states that do the number of capital cases is very low as capital cases are very expensive to prosecute since the trial and appeals process can drag on for decades.
      The last person my state executed it cost the state $1.4million to try,convict and carry through with the appeals process and this was for a double murderer(killed a woman in a bank robbery and then killed a sheriffs deputy who was trying to arrest him).He admitted it,the dash camera recorded it and he even said he wanted to die rather than spend life in prison.Still it took over ten years for the process to work through.

      • Cadwallader says:

        Thanks. There’s a definite steady trend in favour. I understand that it is available for more than first degree homicide cases.

  22. KG says:

    “First, kill the lawyers..”