note to the U.N…

upyu_002  ‘UN issues NZ 155 human rights tasks’
I see in the article the U.N. is described as “the international community”.  Community my arse. A pack of unelected, totalitarian pricks interfering in national sovereignty is about as much a “community” as a slug is a racehorse.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to note to the U.N…

  1. Tom says:

    Need it be said……..Fuck the un.

  2. KG says:

    Amen. Did anybody ever ask you or me or anybody else if they agreed to sign up to the agenda of this gaggle of turds?

  3. Michael in Nelson says:

    I noticed the first item on the list was to sign international agreements. Could anyone here educate me on when any nation that signed one of these agreements was better off for it?

    Oh yeah…fuck the UN

  4. ZenTiger says:

    Note to self: Add another task to the list, and do it first: Withdraw all funding to the UN. Stops us supporting nations of human rights abusers.

    • KG says:

      We never get a choice about how our taxes are spent, do we? You’d think it was stolen money being divided up among con-artists and scammers or something….
      Oh, hang on…..

  5. The Gantt Guy says:

    “UN issues NZ 155 human rights tasks”
    NZ issues UN one human rights task: FUCK OFF.
    Smiley

  6. dondiego says:

    I wonder how many whanau babies got battered bruised or buried in the time it took to write that list.
    Would’ve been interesting to see commie-spin x 155.

    Actually, change interesting to infuriating.

  7. Darin says:

    The UN knows as much about Human rights as snails know about space flight :evil:

  8. It is time for the UN to go the way of the League of Nations. It is just as inept, just as useless, and just needs to go away and stop wasting it’s member’s money.

  9. Mathew says:

    The only good thing about western nations going broke is that it’ll force us to reconsider how much money we shovel off to these parasites, or at the very least start asking some uncomfortable questions about value for money, return on contributions etc.

  10. KG says:

    Yep. (to both William and Mathew)