Sure is.

Posted on April 12, 2014 by KG

bk4gknocaaah9_f-1

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Sure is.

  1. Carol-Christian Soldier says:
    April 12, 2014 at 15:50

    Yes it is-and– Thank you for standing w/ us in the US–we Cowboys!!

    BTW-Sen Harry Reid and his son Rory are looking at $5 billion —
    http://carolmsblog.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-jbs-warned-us-in-2012-rory-reid-sen.html
    Have not heard anything about their deal w/ China – not even from FOX–
    C-CS

    • mawm says:
      April 12, 2014 at 18:13

      Has there ever been a more detestable politician than Harry Reid? (maybe Edward Kennedy) – so, so corrupt that in any other Western country he would have been in gaol already. :evil:

  3. KG says:
    April 12, 2014 at 16:32

    Meanwhile, as the corruptocrats gorge on the carcass of America:
    ‘Life in Barack Obama’s sweeter, kinder America:

    A few weeks ago, with no notice, the U.S. government intercepted Mary Grice’s tax refunds from both the IRS and the state of Maryland. Grice had no idea that Uncle Sam had seized her money until some days later, when she got a letter saying that her refund had gone to satisfy an old debt to the government — a very old debt.

    When Grice was 4, back in 1960, her father died, leaving her mother with five children to raise. Until the kids turned 18, Sadie Grice got survivor benefits from Social Security to help feed and clothe them.

    Now, Social Security claims it overpaid someone in the Grice family — it’s not sure who — in 1977. After 37 years of silence, four years after Sadie Grice died, the government is coming after her daughter. ‘

  4. KG says:
    April 12, 2014 at 16:55

    The final sentence makes plain where this bastard is coming from:
    ‘ Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens argues in the Washington Post that the debate over the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms can be settled with the addition of five words. Here they are, inserted into the amendment in bold:

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.”

    In his essay, which is an excerpt from his new book, Stevens writes that those words get back to what the original drafters had mind. It wasn’t about personal self-defense—”the notion that the states were concerned about possible infringement of that right by the federal government is really quite absurd.” Instead, the amendment was intended to protect “the citizen’s right (and duty) to keep and bear arms when serving in a state militia,” he writes. This stemmed from states’ concerns about a national standing army running roughshod over them, he explains. Recent court opinions have lost sight of this and curbed the government’s ability to “minimize the slaughter caused by the prevalence of weapons in private hands.”

    What “slaughter”? As John Lott makes plain (and it’s backed by official FBI figures) guns in private hands save lives. And why doesn’t this clown speak of the “slaughter” private swimming pools are responsible for? They kill more people each year than do guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens.
    The Founders made plain that the right to keep and bear arms was as much for protection against a tyrannical government as anything else.
    But that’s a minor inconvenient detail to this statist cunt.

    • Andrew Berwick says:
      April 12, 2014 at 17:05

      Time someone “took the second” to deal with all that rot.

    • mawm says:
      April 12, 2014 at 18:09

      Don’t forget the annual slaughter by motor vehicle! Still the most deadly implement in human hands.

      The impending blow up in the US will spread, just as the Berkley riots spread to the Sorbonne, etc., but the disarmed populations of Europe and Great Britain (a geographical description) in trying to challenge their governments will find out precisely why they were disarmed. Oz and NZ as well …. eventually.

      • KG says:
        April 12, 2014 at 18:14

        For sure, Mawm. But arms in the hands of the government only are not the last word when it comes to the overthrow of them. People have lots of ways of toppling governments, should they ever get off their backsides, get together and act.

    • The Gantt Guy says:
      April 12, 2014 at 19:50

      I vaguely recall a State Rep called in the Mark Levin show a couple of months ago. He said he was one of several sponsors of a Bill in his State which basically required every citizen between the ages of 18 and 65 to be available to serve in the State Militia.

      I thought at the time it was a strange Bill to have passed by the State, but this post provides the context.

      Bastards!

    • The Political Hat says:
      April 13, 2014 at 17:40

      What he fails to realize is that the right to personal arms is both ancient and sacred. The 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution simply declares what already existed: that the right to arms was sacrosanct. This right was a basic English right from not just the British “Bill of Rights” but goes all the way back to Anglo-Saxon times when the carrying of a Seax was the right of any freeman (it is from this weapon and the right to carry it that the word “Saxon” was derived).

      Even Locke noted that when a lawful government was not around, the situation devolved into a natural right to defend oneself by any means necessary to neutralize the threat.

      In the end, it is better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.

  5. Lara says:
    April 12, 2014 at 19:06

    can we topple the UN? Horses and spears?

  6. KG says:
    April 12, 2014 at 19:19

    ‘Americans have been surrounded, deliberately corralled, by an increasing code of regulations. Americans have regulations pointed at their healthcare in the form of ObamaCare, their finances by the mercurial IRS, their communications by the NSA, the future education of young Americans by the newly launched Common Core. When will Americans reach the tipping point? It might all begin in Senator Reid’s home state — the Nevadan Wild West.’
    http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/04/bundy_ranch_the_federal_government_and_the_nevada_water_tipping_point.html

  7. Robertv says:
    April 12, 2014 at 20:50

    I presume Darin is on his way to Bunkerville, Nevada ?

    :evil: