There’s money for “refugees” and Maori, though…

Posted on March 22, 2015 by KG

‘Cancer experts and patients met Health Minister Jonathan Coleman this week only to be told there is no more money…’   link

And $25,000,000 for bullshit committees, propaganda and a referendum to change the flag. Bastards.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to There’s money for “refugees” and Maori, though…

  1. Ronbo says:
    March 22, 2015 at 10:30

    Innocent blood is on Leftist hands once again :!: :twisted:

  2. Warren Tooley says:
    March 22, 2015 at 11:43

    Ahhh, but it gets worse. On kiwiblog, people are ruthlessly demanding Euthanasia, and making fun of anyone who doesn’t agree with it. You run out of money for health spending, what are we going to do. I know Euthanasia. Isn’t it a coincidence that both have happened at the same time.

    • Odakyu-sen says:
      March 22, 2015 at 17:08

      With an aging population, euthanasia won’t be going away soon.

      (Bad joke alert)
      A lack of youth in asia is one of the driving forces behind euthanasia in Asia.
      :oops:

      • Warren Tooley says:
        March 22, 2015 at 17:37

        I get the humour, :lol: , yeah the problem is the government didn’t keep its word. The idea was you pay income tax, some of that will go to your retirement. But they haven’t been saving what they promised they would. So now that their so few young able to support the old, that’s why the government is in big trouble.

  3. caleb says:
    March 22, 2015 at 12:15

    BS.
    Damn we lack selfless leadership.

  4. Michael in Nelson says:
    March 22, 2015 at 17:51

    What the hell can you expect in a country where one of the major television stations spends an important portion of their evening news on Hatha Yoga when the US and Europe are groaning under unmanageable debt, Governments impose negative interest rates on their citizens, Islam is threatening to slaughter the rest of the world, and there is no superpower left willing to take on the role of policeman for the world (and yes the rest of the world did abrogate that responsibility to the US).

    *end of rant*

    • KG says:
      March 22, 2015 at 17:54

      Damn right, Michael.

    • Warren Tooley says:
      March 22, 2015 at 17:55

      So Michael in Nelson, now can you see why they are pushing for Euthanasia. I don’t know how the US will pay its bills otherwise.http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cry.gif

      • Darin says:
        March 22, 2015 at 18:23

        They don’t care about euthanasia that much though,since they are planning to pick clean what’s left of everyone’s savings and retirement plans.That and flood the country with a new permanent underclass of low wage working schmucks to finance the ponzi scheme a little longer.

        That’s why the only option we the people have left is a culling of the ruling class and the leaching class.About 47 million should do it. :evil:

          • Warren Tooley says:
            March 22, 2015 at 19:30

            So who’s on your list, I mean what groups. Are we talking Democrats are we talking bankers or Barrister lawyers. Just so that your aware I don’t have a gun, so I won’t be doing a darn thing.

            • Wombat says:
              March 22, 2015 at 20:23

              Then when things get frisky you’ll pretty much be reduced to political driftwood then, wont you?

            • Darin says:
              March 22, 2015 at 20:29

              Basically what I am saying is if DC,NYC,LA, and a few other large,deep blue population centers disappeared off the face of the Earth,they would not be missed and I believe we would be better off without them.

              Oddly enough,at this point in our history we would be better off with a full on nuclear exchange than the current downward spiral of societal rot we are dying of now.

              Besides,the way things are going in the world it’s not outside the realm of possibility.Let’s face it,America as it stands has been forsaken by God,there is no way but down from here I am afraid.

              • KG says:
                March 22, 2015 at 20:32

                “Oddly enough,at this point in our history we would be better off with a full on nuclear exchange than the current downward spiral of societal rot we are dying of now.”
                Yes indeed, Darin. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_good.gif
                I agree with that. Better Armageddon than slavery.

              • Warren Tooley says:
                March 22, 2015 at 21:42

                Well, I definitely agree, with your comments about D.C. D.C. was originally set up to serve the people. Now its enslaving the people. New York City is even worse. The World bank, the IMF, and the UN are their enslaving the rest of the world. And LA is pretty dangerous, and then their’s Hollywood polluting the world with its filth. Yes, either those places get overturned or things will get worse.

              • Richard says:
                March 22, 2015 at 22:20

                It’s not that I want to pick you out of the fray but your comment brings to mind a few things. One, given that the strategy I seek to follow is mostly military history it would be natural that I turn to events of WWII. In the dark days when the Allies were on the precipice, when it wasn’t likely that we would prevail, how did men like Churchill or Patton respond? Thank God they did not just fold up and say ‘nowhere but down from here’. There are even more bloody examples from the American Revolution where good men continued to press on, against difficult odds.
                Even in God’s holy word there are ample examples of people not giving in or giving up.

                I know, I’m no spring chicken either and it’s difficult to carry on. But we all know beyond all doubt that it is worth it to continue. Carry on for the cause is just pretty much sums it up.
                As pointed out in the comments here, the best course would be to mount up en masse rather than be picked off one by one. Make those bastards die for their false beliefs.

                • Warren Tooley says:
                  March 23, 2015 at 17:48

                  Well Richard that brings up a good point. We have things God wants us to do, and we have only so long to do it. So we should keep a balance between, doing, but being prepared for the battering ram that is to come.

      • Michael in Nelson says:
        March 22, 2015 at 21:25

        Well Warren, I am past the official retirement age and still pay taxes because I work full time. As a US citizen, I see that as my only protection when I vacation there.

        • Warren Tooley says:
          March 22, 2015 at 21:43

          You poor man. Its like someone has taken all that you’ve earned and thrown it to the dogs. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cry.gif Should be called district of criminals.

  5. KG says:
    March 22, 2015 at 21:29

    If you don’t have a gun, Warren, then are you hoping for other people to protect you if TSHTF?

    • Warren Tooley says:
      March 22, 2015 at 21:48

      Well, KG, unfortunately in NZ we don’t have a constitution or a 2nd amendment, and gun ownership your meant to have a licence. Now of course if I become a sovereign, then I can have a gun. But to become a sovereign is a big decision. To become a sovereign you’ll need to be self-employed first, and their’s a number of other things involved. But I have a BB gun.

      But yes your right, the one thing stopping the New World Order is American’s gun ownership.

      • Wombat says:
        March 23, 2015 at 11:31

        I would strongly suggest that you become a participatory member of a gun club. If they’re anything like the Australian ones then they’ll sometimes have a club rifle or pistol that can be used by folks that don’t have one of their own.

        This will give you practice, but more importantly contacts. Find someone trustworthy there who also has concerns about the “sustainability of our rule of law”. Preferably someone who lives close to you. Once the two of you are officially “chums” explain your situation and ask them to buy a rifle/pistol/shotgun/whatever in their name along with a stack of ammo. This way you can ask them to bring “your” gun when they attend the club.

        Then, when the rule of law no longer applies you can go and retrieve your rifle/pistol/shotgun/whatever.

        If the NZ laws are similar to the OZ laws then you can get a permit to shoot at a club without having to get a full license. If you’re lucky enough you’ll be able to make contacts with some farmers who’ll take you out shooting vermin regularly. Again, if our laws are similar then you can lawfully shoot with a licensed shooter even if you don’t have a license yourself.

        If you take the threats to our future seriously then you’ll want to put the effort in to making sure you’re not empty-handed when TSHTF.

        • KG says:
          March 23, 2015 at 14:33

          What Wombat said, Warren, is excellent advice.
          If there are impediments to you getting a NZ licence, there are ways around that.
          (I’m told.) :twisted:

  6. Warren Tooley says:
    March 23, 2015 at 16:01

    Thanks Wombat, either I’ll go with the gun club idea, or I’ll get a sovereign to have an extra gun on my behalf. The sovereign who’s telling me all this, says that soon something is going to happen, and we’re going to be in crisis, and the police will start to arm themselves and their will be total tyranny. So I’m keeping an eye out for then, and I expect to have something sorted by then. Sovereigns don’t need to have a gun licence, they are people who have no agreements whatsoever with the state, not even a driver’s licence. So its not so easy to survive as such.

    And yes Australia and NZ have similiar laws. In the preamble to the Australian constitiution it says:

    6. “The Commonwealth” shall mean the Commonwealth of Australia as established under this Act. “The States” shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland…” Well that’s according to a particular book. But I don’t think New Zealand has signed up to it yet. So, now we know why are laws must be similiar, so that we can have harmony. But that’s just according to a book. But sure enough I looked it up on google the Australian constitution and its under 6.

  7. Darin says:
    March 23, 2015 at 16:17

    “But yes your right, the one thing stopping the New World Order is American’s gun ownership.”

    Yup,and we aren’t quite alone either,there are many Canadians who didn’t surrender their weapons either and since the recent attack on their Parliament where one individual with a gun stopped the attack cold while everyone else was running away there is a renewed interest in rolling back at least some of their gun laws.

    • Wombat says:
      March 23, 2015 at 21:33

      Canada is actually the beacon to the rest of us gun-control former(ish) colony nations. They’ve rolled back their registration on longarms and yet there have been no massacres so far.

      Needless to say the MSM avoids reporting on the Canadian example at all costs.

      • Warren Tooley says:
        March 23, 2015 at 22:30

        Wombat, this is what Alex Jones has been saying numerous times. The statistic they never reveal, is that the more guns everybody has, the less violence their is, cause their’s no one to take advantage of.

        • Wombat says:
          March 23, 2015 at 23:34

          The counterclaim from the progressives in the MSM is “yeah, well look at Yemen!”

          The rational response to which is reminding them that islamic shitholes are not indicative of western outcomes.

          The counter-response is of course “RAAAAAACCIIIIST!”.

          :roll:

          • Warren Tooley says:
            March 24, 2015 at 14:55

            Wombat, this is why I would say be specific at all times. Alex’s statistics were as far as the USA was concerned. Cities in the USA. As long as you say the USA, and it concerns the USA, you’ve set the platform.

            But if your not specific, that’s when they will define things how they want. I know this trick cause of these customer service people, who will never say the company is at fault. They do not like specifics, as long as it is general, they can have control, and shift things around.

            For instance, on Thursday 29th of Jan this person was slacking around. Response, I have never seen this person slack around. They didn’t address the specific of the 29th of Jan, they’ve redefined the arguement to they’ve never seen them slack off. I have experience in this area, and know you have to be specific, and keep it to the topic, because they will shift it around.

            • Warren Tooley says:
              March 24, 2015 at 15:30

              Or to give another example. At a book shop the policy was to sell books that were currently in demand. So when someone wanted to buy an older book, this was frowned on.

              If the answer was we are out of stock, then the customer might ask to reorder. So they couldn’t say we are out of stock. The answer given was we cannot trace this book in our warehouse. This way it would avoid the reorder or not reorder dilemma, but still let the customer know we didn’t have it. Some people know how to direct and control the conversation, by manipulating the facts, and there worst nightmare, is when you stick to the specifics. With big picture generalisations, very easy for them to direct and control. Not so easy with specifics.

  8. Darin says:
    March 24, 2015 at 01:46

    “Needless to say the MSM avoids reporting on the Canadian example at all costs.”

    We went open carry where I live last year,if you’re over 18 and not a convicted felon you can carry on your hip or in your belt so long as it’s visible no license required.

    The law as you could carry concealed or not if you were on your property or in your vehicle or carry concealed with a permit.When we started to get the open carry law passed,there were all kinds of claims that the murder rate would increase,the bodies of the dead would block the storm drains etc,etc…….none of which happened.Instead the murder rate went down,as did violent crime.

    The best part is the polls have shifted towards changing the law once again to Constitutional carry,there weren’t enough votes this year to get it passed,but next year sees a few more Dems leaving the state house most likely to be replaced by Teaparty.I think then we will get it done.

    The objections so far to that are over convicted felons being able to own guns again.My view on that is if a man has committed a crime,was convicted,sent to prison and served his time,once he leaves prison and his parole is over he should have his rights restored including the right to carry a firearm.He’s been rehabilitated right?

    • Warren Tooley says:
      March 24, 2015 at 18:24

      In that case Darin, get that change as soon as you can. With the way the culture is going, it just might be too late if we wait any longer then is necessary.

  9. KG says:
    March 24, 2015 at 15:04

    “My view on that is if a man has committed a crime,was convicted,sent to prison and served his time,once he leaves prison and his parole is over he should have his rights restored including the right to carry a firearm.”
    Absolutely.