‘This dad calculated that stay-at-home mums should earn $98,000 a year’
What about the work-full- time dads who mow the lawns, fix the washing machine, paint the roof, take the kids to sports at the weekend, act as unpaid bodyguards for the family, service the car, fix leaky taps etc etc etc?
This article is a load of bullshit. In a marriage, each partner’s contribution cannot be reduced to dollars and cents.
The “unpaid housewife” theme is getting to be real old. What’s more, most men I’ve known seem to be able to manage tasks such as doing the washing and shopping and cleaning the house in half the time women take. Perhaps because they don’t take time out for coffee with the girls and talking on the ‘phone?
CrusaderRabbit
FOR LIBERTY
Well i guess, if they had special skills….
er-mm… like building a second story on the house while home schooling the children.
Reminds me of when my first couple little nephews came along.SIL was all high and mighty that my Bro could not handle diaper changes,to which his reply was “no,you just can’t handle the way I change diapers”.
Some earlier complaint about him “acting like a Nascar pit crew and going too fast”
To which Bro replied “well we’re wiping s–t and slapping on a new diaper,not painting the Sistine Chapel FFS!” 
Anyone who had learnt to speed clean a barracks to perfection, get muddy kit spotless, iron a starched uniform daily and scrub mess tins until they shine laughs at a bit of housework!
Well these people are not prepared for the Tooley massacre.
They keep making these statements and the Tooley way will seem more attractive to those men who want a fair deal.
For a Tooley in my generation, it is normal that in the case that their is a marriage, both partners get paid work for at least 5 years. Only after 5 years, is the possibility of children even discussed or thought of.
This is a generational issue. My great grandfather was given no inheritance.
He went ahead got married had children even though his money was lacking. When he died he left nothing to his children, and his children borrowed for the funeral debt. 
Yet rather then pay off that debt first, he went ahead got married had children, and that debt was a burden because they had children to take care of, while paying the debt 
. By the time they died, nothing for the children. This generational cycle happened over and over again. Well now, my generation is doing it differently. You don’t have a child until your student loan is paid off.
So that’s why this way of both partners working, loving each other, with no children for a long time is natural, for us. We don’t want to repeat the same mistake. Anyhow, one of my brothers was worried about this whole DPB culture
, he knew that it always went in favour of the women, in New Zealand so he decided early on no children, and he would enjoy life, and his girlfriend agreed.
But later on he moved to England as the rules are more fair to the men. So, with these people trying to keep the status quo, making sure the women gets the better end of the deal. What are they going to do about us Tooleys? 
It means that if a marriage lasts less then 5 years, no children, no DPB, no alimony. And 5 years is plenty of time, to say this is not going great, no children. Only if its going great after more than 5 years will their be a child. If the Tooley way catches on,
what will these feminists do about it? Oh by the way my great grandfather was a freemason, so its taken 4 generations to redeem ourselves of the poverty he left us. 
KG ?
What I’m saying KG, is people get married have a child, they have a split, someone has to take care of the child, and so the person working is expected to pay alimony
, even though they can’t see their child when they want.
So, this is just another way of justifying men paying out plenty, and getting nothing
. Now at the same time, with my unique generational family situation, it is an asset at this point in time. If both partners are expected to earn money, for 5 years, it puts a stop to people taking advantage and saying I’ll have a divorce, and then gain financial security 
. It puts a stop to that right then and there. Now I don’t expect everybody to do just that. But my point is that with the way we naturally do it, it is a big attack on these feminazis. And Nazi perfectly describes. In Nazism, if you had a business, you were free to earn money, but your money wasn’t your money, you got hit with high taxes, and high regulations. In other words you simply had the right to use it, and you maintained that right provided you used that to serve the Nazi state. And that’s what these feminists are all about. Anytime they aren’t happy, they will take everything you’ve got, as soon as they aren’t happy, and NZ is the one place that’s easy for them to do it, as they have the law to back them up. But no they don’t win with my brothers. Hee hee
When I say, hee hee, I mean, we’re the ones laughing, not these feminazis.
Considering the going rate for a gigolo, my wife is going to need to do a lot more ironing.
Last year, 478 babies were born to single mothers via artificial insemination, in comparison with 449 in 2013. Ninety per cent of these mothers admitted that their initial plan had been to become pregnant through a partner, but had later opted to go the solo route.
http://www.icenews.is/2015/04/06/more-danish-women-becoming-solo-mothers/
Perhaps men should refuse to be sperm donors, Robert.
Ah ha Robert, this just proves my point. The problem is when the woman is a hedonist. If she is, then she is quite happy to take advantage of the system if she profits from it. Now Jesus said where your heart is their your treasure will be. If its all about comfy living, they will take advantage of the system, in any way that it can be taken advantage of.
So by my brothers waiting years before having children and in the meantime, both people work. If her motive was wrong, she’ll just pick someone else. So my brothers end up with women who truly have a heart for their man, and not the comfy living.
By the way, I’ve had three female stalkers in one year, and have received 5 marriage proposals. So I do have my attractive qualities. By female stalkers, this doesn’t include the men who were jealous when I was going out with Marie, hee hee
Yeah, Marie got concerned with all the men who showed attraction to me. I didn’t notice it till then, I was just trying to be friendly, nothing more.
I think stay-at-home-mums should get paid $304098 a year, now off you go out into the world to get the money for them Steven, go on son, take your calculator, your blog and your spreadsheets with you.
There are a lot of halfwits out there with fanciful notions of their over-inflated self worth, no Steven and/or Glory {what sort of name is that!}, you’re not worth all the thousands of dollars you’ve dreamt up. Heck, you can go out there into the wild and chop wood from 5am till 5pm every day and yeah that’s a lot of work, but it ain’t worth shit if no one out there is willing to put actual money into your hands and let you keep it.
Exactly right.