From Gates of Vienna:

Posted on by

‘Our Washington D.C. correspondent Frontinus sends this report on proposed House Resolution 569, “Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States”, which is now before the U.S. Congress with 82 co-sponsors (all Democrats).
Your American readers who aren’t aware of HR569 probably should be, and your European and Canadian readers may be interested to learn just how successful the Muslim Brotherhood has been in its penetration of the U.S. government, and how close we are to seeing the full implementation of U.N. Resolution 16/18 in this country…’
LINK
Frightening stuff.  The muzzies are winning while the sheeple watch Dancing With the Stars.

21 thoughts on “From Gates of Vienna:”

  1. The Democraps are always putting Constitution busting nonsense like this on the House agenda, but I doubt the bill sees the light of day – I don’t think even RINO Paul Ryan is that stupid – and the bill does become law – well, the U.S. Government can take a long walk down a very short pier because the majority of Americans WILL NOT OBEY!

    We remember 9/11 and 3,000 innocent, hard working Americans murdered in NYC in a most hideous manner by Muslims on a beautiful September day.

    WE DON’T FORGET! WE DON’T FORGIVE! WE WANT TOTAL WAR AGAINST ISLAM!

    BTW, de facto there is already a DOJ directive forbidding telling the truth about Islam – but we see how little obedience there is to that command in the USA.

    In fact, blogs like mine have doubled down on Islam – and we have thrown down the gauntlet at the feet of Attorney General Lynch – who has yet to indict ONE anti-Islamic blogger!

    SO GET FUCKED OBAMA REGIME!http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

    …

    • Ron,

      Sadly I think your faith in the good sense of most Americans is about to be shattered. Britain got the first of many Race Relations Acts in 1965. Successive enlargements of its reach mean that it now covers both race and religion, and all parts of life both public and private. People have recently been arrested for quoting the politically incorrect statements of Winston Churchill (his comments about Islam in “River Wars”) and for stating Biblical Truth (Pastor McConnell of Belfast). Most quite happily believe (because the MSM told them to) that these miscreants “had it coming to them” and they shouldn’t have been “so offensive”. (The verdict and sentencing in Pastor McConnell’s case is due on Tuesday 5th. Watch how the BBC reports it for the elite establishent’s view.)

      I concede that the rebellion in US will be greater than in Britain, but it will still not be big enough even to pause the imposition of Sharia by stealth.

      • Sorry I didn’t make the point strongly enough that it is the drip drip salami slicing of constant unrelenting pressure that will get this through. Each time enough people will agree with “just one more” baby step in the Left direction that they won’t notice the cumulative effect.

        Note how most of the media took it out on Diana West for exposing what had happened (American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character), rather than on those who were the actual traitors.

        • Not Churchill, Powell. Same thing really, except Churchill was establishment whereas Powell was English. Good bloke actually, too clever for his own good. That’s why we are busy dumbing down.

            • If anyone asked me five years ago whether the left was going creep its way to total domination I would have said “yes, barring a black swan event”.

              Now? Rebellion appears to be growing exponentially, fueled ironically by the social media outlets the left thought would seal their victory.

              Now, even if they dump us from social media the damage to their legacy has already been done, because we know we’re not alone.
              We’re not some singular pack of malcontents, and more importantly, we’re now aware of it.

  3. @Yokel:

    I take you’re British?

    Like the wise man once said, “The British and Americans are a single people separated by a common language.”

    I translate that as meaning Britain and America – with all the common things we share – are different nations with a different psychology.

    One thing that separates our nations is the fact that Britons consider themselves SUBJECTS and Americans think of themselves as CITIZENS.

    The British are a family, written large – the king or queen is the mother/father figure of the nation above politics – up there in the sky with God.

    Americans are individualists of many different races/creeds/colors/nations united by only two things: the English language and the U.S. Constitution – these two things are glue that holds together our vast European sized republic of more than three time zones.

    So without the Big Contract in force and a common language in usage the republic falls to tiny pieces…

    Twice in our history we have had a Great Constitutional Crisis. The first was in 1775. The second was in 1861. The weakness and the strength of our republic is the U.S. Constitution – a weakness because freedom of speech, assembly, press, etc. can lead to the creation of an opposition party that wants to overthrow the republic. A good example is the Progressive movement that has taken over the leadership of both major political parties and seeks to create a totalitarian regime.

    The U.S. Constitution is a strength because even after a 100 plus year attempt to overthrow the republic, a viable opposition group now called the Tea Party is still in place on the political battlefield with a very alive and noisy media to support it, and a membership that runs into millions. This branch of the American electorate takes the U.S. Constitution very seriously and in the last seven years of the Obama Regime has elevated into local, state and federal offices over 1,000 stalwart Republicans.

    The periodic problem of the Constitutional Crisis was foretold by Thomas Jefferson in 1787 when he said, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. it is it’s natural manure.”

    I think we have reached our “Third Great Constitutional Crisis” in 2015 – where the party of traitors and tyrants have seized control of the machinery of government in a slow motion putsch going back decades – and the monster is finally showing its fangs.

    However, the monster of tyranny faces an unorganized army of well armed citizens who stand on guard waiting for the first shot in the revolution to be fired by the enemy…THEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOSE!

    Yokel, my friend, I think you fall into the Marxist trap of “We are inevitable” – nothing in history is INEVITABLE.

    In Britain they say, “The Queen reigns but does not rule.”

    In America we always remember what President Jackson said in the 1830s when the U.S. Supreme Court thought it controlled the U.S. Constitution, “The Chief Justice made his ruling…now let’s see him enforce it.”

    So I say, “The Obama Regime has made their law…now let’s see them enforce it.”http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

    • @ Ron, Yes I’m British.

      You rely mostly on events that happened over 150 years ago to make your point that “we the people” will not stand for such kow-towing to the muslims. Perhaps by 1850 things were developing in the US as you would think these days. I would point out that in 1800 or so, a fifth of all US government spending was in tribute money to the Barbary Coast states as Jizya for the protection of shipping. It was only France’s colonisation of Algeria that finally put paid to that disgusting habit. OK so the Second Barbary War might have helped a bit, but why didn’t your lot finish the job off first time?

      In the last 150 years many things have happened to undermine the whole of Western civilisation, including that in the US. Marxism as you mention is one of them. When that failed to bring about the predicted popular uprisings in countries other than possibly in Russia, the theorists went away to hide. They founded The Frankfurt School in “social theory and philosophy” as part of the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University, Frankfurt. They had to run away during the ascendancy of the German National Socialist Workers Party, and were given sanctuary in the US by Columbia University amongst others. Some returned to Frankfurt after the war, others stayed put in the States.

      The whole principle of the Frankfurt School was that if Communism could no longer be imposed on a nation initially by brute force, then it was therefore necessary to do it by subterfuge. First they said they must destroy the nation from within so that from the crumpled ruins, a strong man would be welcomed with open arms no matter what his agenda so long as “the trains ran on time” again. It was recognised that the ordinary working folk would have no truck with any of this if approached directly, so the ground must be prepared for them. Initial targets for attack are all those places that first adopted “political correctness” ie academia, the media (both news and Hollywood), teacher training, etc. Now when you object, the Frankfurt School operative will reply “No matter, we’ve got your children from under your nose”.

      In this context let us not worry about Britain, it is almost certainly lost on any of the criteria they set out. But consider how far gone the US is with:
      1. The creation of racism offences and hate speech laws.
      2. Continual change to create confusion (eg in school curricula).
      3. Masturbation propaganda in schools, combined with the homosexualization of children and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom. (eg 80 UK primary school children seeking sex change noted on this site a week or so ago)
      4. The systematic undermining of parental and teachers’ authority.
      5. Huge immigration to destroy national identity and foment future race wars.
      6. The systematic promotion of excessive drinking and recreational drugs.
      7. The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in society.
      8. An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime.
      9. Dependency on state benefits.
      10. Control of and dumbing down of media.
      11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
      12. All all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying of churches.
      To achieve this they would exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, and the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women (eg the Swinging Sixties).

      The methods they would use included:
      1. attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children (eg home schooling is illegal in Germany).
      2. abolish all differences in the education of boys and girls
      3. abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces and upper layers of business management (with targets for “equality”)
      4. declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ with men as their ‘oppressors’.

      I accept that in the countryside (where I live) it isn’t as bad as in the middle of the big cities. But the vast majority of the population resides in big cities. They are the population who will support the tyranny when it arises (for their trains will run on time again). They are the people who will think nothing of dobbing you in to the Stasi in exchange for being let off on a parking violation. I know that only 3% of the then population were active Revolutionaries, and they won against the British of the day. BUT since then Uncle Sam has discovered quite a penchant for spying on his own population, just like the British government has. If the British government had in 1764 the surveillance capability that all of the Five Eyes governments have right now, you would still be trading in pounds sterling, driving on the right, and without any privately held guns. Washington and others would just be a footnote in history like Wat Tyler (Peasants Revolt 1381). By 1765, death sentences would have been passed and executed not only on the leading revolutionaries but also on any other supporter who showed signs of objecting to the slaughter.

      Yes I have seen the plentiful signs of Marxist control in my country, and I can see it in yours as well. I fear that the rhetoric from 3%ers is bravado. It might be bloody bravado, but it will be just as ineffective. Equally, some US troops will be court martialled for refusing to fire on US citizens, but have no fear as Obama has already purged the military top brass so they won’t worry about prosecuting or signing the necessary execution warrants. And I think you know just how well the veterans administration looks after the people it has been tasked to! If there were going to be stronger resistance, then Diana West would be feted not vilified for her books “American Betrayal” and “The Death of the Grown Up”. She has been slapped by the MSM into her place as just another right wing nutcase and ignored by the majority of proper pc thinking folks.

      I am sure that we have now passed the point at which human effort can retrieve this situation. Satan has his troops out of their barracks, and has them marching on just about every country in the world. In every country there is only One who can save us. Let us ask Him.

      • Or, to put it a different way … it’s like when you buy a meat pie. If you take a great big bite right out of the centre, you end up with a burnt tongue and steak & gravy all over your trousers. So, you nibble at the crust, around the edges while you wait for the filling to cool a little.

        Were Mr Ronbo to look around, I suspect he’d find much of the crust already gone. The filling is still too hot to eat, but, well, they have all the time in the world don’t they? Because it’s impossible to put a fresh crust on a half-eaten pie.

        • I think Mr Yokel is a bit pessimistic, and that’s something coming from a tragic pessimist.

          Keep in mind that the 3% were the men who took arms. The rough tally was a third in favor of the king, a third against and third in the DILLIGAF camp.

          With the ass dropping out of the middle-class, there are a lot of men with guns , no jobs, and a serious grudge about being perpetually lectured about white privilege at the same time as their house is being repossessed.

          The salt in the wound is seeing every bastard on the government payroll from the local postman to the head of the IRS with a overly generous salary, pension and perks. Anger is brewing. Believe it.

          As for, “we’re fucked unless God saves us”? Screw that. God helps those that help themselves, and quitters can go to hell with the rest.

          “Satans army” is comprised by little more than a pack of inbred muslims supported by the pajama boy social media brigade, and the ONLY thing standing between them and complete obliteration is our fear, our laziness and our self-doubt.

  4. There are not nearly enough cops, courts, prisons, or leftards with the much needed “central dangling extremities”, to enforce such nonsensical bullshit. Of course, I base this opinion on the hope and prayer that the head leftards don’t succeed in their “disarming us” prerequisite.

    I am reminded of the movie, “Demolition Man”, wherein ever-present automated dispensers verbally chided offenders and issued written citations for violation of the “verbal morality code”. I don’t believe in all the world, there are enough trees to make the paper, on which to print the citations, nor the number of people needed to replenish the citation dispenser supplies for just one days worth of muzzie bashing here in the USA. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • They don’t need to target everyone committing the crime in order to place a chilling effect on the speech they wish to suppress. Look at Australia. They prosecuted two Pastors and the nation’s most prominent Conservative commentator. That was enough – with a very few exceptions, there is now much less strident examination and criticism than would otherwise have been.

      Pour encourager les autres

      • “That was enough – with a very few exceptions, there is now much less strident examination and criticism than would otherwise have been.

        Pour encourager les autres”

        Exactly. That’s how it’s done, and it always works.

        • The ratchet only works in one direction, until someone hits the release lever.

              • Personally I think it’s having the opposite effect.

                Every time they make a martyr out of some poor schmuck it simply pisses the rest of us off even more, and we’re voicing that anger in what’s almost certainly record numbers.

                Sure, they’ll take the tallest poppies, but the overall height of the crop is rising by the day.

                • It’s been illegal to make Moonshine here since before we were a nation.And that fact has never stopped anyone from doing it.Today there are more Moonshiners than at anytime in our history.Why?Because some folks just don’t give a damn.

Comments are closed.