Bullshit.
‘Why women need more sleep than men
Research has revealed women need to spend more time sleeping than men because of their “complex” brains.
Scientists found women require around 20 minutes more sleep compared to men, as a result of how much harder the female brain works during waking hours.
….The amount of sleep needed is determined by the complexity and intensity of brain activity during the day.
Because women tend to multi-task they use more of their brain than men, resulting in the need for more sleep…..’
Leftists/”progressives”/socialists are not welcome here. Pay for your own soapbox.
Recent Comments
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 4/26/25
- Darin on Open House 4/26/25
- Darin on Open House 4/26/25
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 4/26/25
- Darin on Open House 4/26/25
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 4/26/25
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 4/26/25
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 4/26/25
‘I believe that politicians, lawyers, busy-bodies and do-gooders are like salamis- greatly improved by hanging for a time.’ Oswald Bastable
- "The loss of freedom is like cancer; it will spread slowly but surely across all parts of society until our liberty has been utterly eaten away and we are left with nothing but a half-forgotten idea of what freedom was."
Meta
Unknown Feed
Blogroll
- "SPEAK FREE OR DIE"
- A Nation of Cowards
- AA Stoic Philosophy and the Profession of Arms
- AAAKIWI GUN BLOG
- AAAThe Misguided Advocates of Open Borders
- America's Ruling Class
- Australian Morning Mail
- BARBARIANS AT THE GATES
- Belmont Club
- Bill Whittle
- bluebird of bitterness
- Carol's Blog
- Cold Fury
- COLONEL B. BUNNY
- Common Cents
- Countenance Blog
- Daily Media Review
- Deringer Files
- DownTrend
- Ed Bonderenka
- European Civil War
- For Feminazis
- Freedom Fighter's Journal
- Freedom Outpost
- Gates of Vienna
- Gecko's pics
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty's Torch
- Mad World News
- mawm (NZ)
- Morning Mail
- Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery (.pdf)
- Not of this World
- NZCPR
- ON GUN CONTROL
- On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
- ONELAWFORALL.NZ
- Orphans of Liberty
- Oswald Bastable (NZ)
- Paladin's Page
- Pascal Fervor Blog
- PM of NZ
- Popehat
- Powerline
- Quadrant Online
- Real Science
- Right Truth
- Right Wing Theocrat (MK)
- Rough Diamond
- Sarah, Maid of Albion
- Sultan Knish
- Tamockcommanderie
- Terry's Blog
- The Conservative Co. NZ
- The Deringer Files
- The Destruction of Macquarie Island
- The Freedom Community
- The Threat We Face
- TrueBlue NZ
- Western Rifle Shooters
- Wolfhowling
- Woman Honor Thyself
- Woodpile Report
Sounds reasonable to me. I’m happy to sneak out to the shed while my lovely wife snoozes on.
Oh, please! I’m overloaded on Leftard bullshit today!
Well, I noticed something similiar. The name Jesse means ‘gift’. So the feminine of Jesse which is Jessica means ‘gift’, right? No, not anymore. It used to be that way. The feminists cannot stand a female name meaning gift to man, so now Jessica means something totally different. Now Jessica means someone with Clairvoyant powers as just one meaning. Because the feminists are rewriting what’s on the net. And this is one of many examples.
From my experience with women, if there’s any truth to this then it follows:
A woman thinks a thing and before deciding to do it agonises for hours over what irrelevant bitches in her familial and social circles will make of it and then does (or does not do) the thing before agonising for several hours more.
A man thinks a thing and does it.
No?
You got it.
You’re not wrong
Bo Chandler, if a woman predominantly bases her decisions on what other women think, I called that GR-Group realisation. And that means what other people think will dominate their decisions.
From the sounds of it, I’ve underestimated how many women are GR girls.
I would more simply compare the mind of the average woman to a computer loaded with malware. Extremely busy all the time, but accomplishing little of what it ought to be.
With the usual exceptions, of course. I’ve known many excellent women but their wiring appears to be anything other than normal.
And progressive programming also shares a large portion of the blame.
Thanks Bo Chandler. The point is you’ve pointed out that the issue you’ve brought up is more widespread than I thought. I thought ‘Group Realisation’-being worried about what others think applies to just a few, when in fact it applies to far more than that.
You’ve enlightened me, and this is my way of saying thank you.

One of the things is at a young age I was going to a Christian school and participating in preaching at a church. So I was popular with the kids, ‘Group realisation’ was in my favour, that’s sort of why I didn’t see it as a problem so much. But I can see how it can be an issue for others.
Cheers. By my reckoning there’s both nature and nurture at play.
That’s sounds very right. Men live in the world of work, objects and tools. Press this button and this will happen. Women live more in the world of look after the people you care about, how will it make the other person feel, what will make this person happy, and so rules and principles are not so important to women.
The thing is though actions get results. So being warm and concerned isn’t going to fix the problem, unless you can find a way to show this is why this went wrong.
So nature, yes men and women have a different purpose, and nurture belongs to women. Getting results belong to men.
Bo, thats a very quick, concise and humourous way to say it. Facts are facts, actions get results. You reap what you sow. But to women that’s not how it works.
It is incomprehensible, to me anyway, how a woman cannot propel a car toward a roundabout, look to the right, asses the on coming traffic (or even total lack thereof) and proceed into the circle without coming to a stop. Similar when changing lanes on a motorway. Must be all those other things on her mind while I drive around with nary an extra thought going on – no worrying about work, family, finances, servicing cars, the latest weather report……. I could go on with a long list of all the other things that aren’t occupying my mind. /sarc
The way I look at it is, men can state facts. With women before they will state the facts they will usually put some sort of spin on it. Men can be objective. Men are subjective with the facts.
Typo, I meant women are subjective with the facts.
More utter bollocks:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/climate-news/77862062/true-shocker-february-spike-in-global-temperatures-stuns-scientists
Note the period these charlatans chose to compare it with…..
The gender dilemma
Dismantling Patriarchy Theory Introduction/Sexual dimorphism
https://youtu.be/bR5jGMVZi1o
At the end of the day, I would still rather spend my time with one, or two, than with any of the various alternatives.
Of course, if they came with a mute button… that would be all the better.
They all come with a moot button, always in the ‘on’ position as default.
This is the false dichotomy the progressives push on us with their divide and conquer tactics.
That we must either accept women as carbon-copy-men (or superiors to men) or be alone.
It’s nonsense of course. Men can love women despite their inability to lift heavy objects or service a car, and women can love men despite their inability to breastfeed or lull a sick, crying infant to sleep.
And frankly, any man who has been stuck dealing with the latter has nothing but respect for the capacity of a women to do some things a man is simply not suited to.
The moment we as a society toss out these progressives and EMBRACE our gender INequalities the happier and more productive we’ll all be.
“The moment we as a society toss out these progressives”.
There it is!!!
But how can we purge the world of all progressives… without it looking like ideology cleansing?
Cut off state welfare. The rest will follow.
SNORE
C-CS
Imagine my shock and surprise to realise that I am actually a man! I first had an inkling of this possibility when someone once observed that I was better at parallel parking than the average guy.
In that case, Gecko must also be a man. She parks a car far better than moi.