Leading from Behind?

Nope,it’s called backing your Commander’s play-

Legal Insurrection-

“he was told by top US commanders that “the most daring and decisive” attack in the battle of Raqqa would not have happened if it hadn’t been for President Trump’s decision to delegate authority to commanders in the field.”

More from the article-

“Ignatius’ contrasting depiction of the Obama administration was incredibly damning: “under Obama, that would have taken a couple of weeks of White House meetings and they still wouldn’t have made up their mind.”

And-

Ignatius also said that the name Trump was cheered whenever it was mentioned during meetings Ignatius had with Syrian forces trying to take out Assad. One Syrian commander praised Trump for having what Ignatius described as a vulgar term that in Spanish is “cojones.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Leading from Behind?

  1. KG says:

    Beautiful stuff! That girly-man bastard took every opportunity he could to caponise the military.
    As for Nikki Haley, she’s twice the man he could ever hope to be. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_good.gif

  2. tranquil says:

    Off-topic here but anyway…..

    One of the things that could help in the fight against Muslims would be if an outbreak of *plague* happened in Europe. We know that in the Middle Ages, plague (the Black Death) tended to hammer the poor more than the rich (who tended to be healthier and could escape to country-houses or wherever….).

    The massively-overcrowded conditions in Europe must *surely* be getting very favourable for an outbreak of plague. It is endemic to North Africa too (IIRC) which is where many of the invaders are coming from.

    Ok, it is true that an outbreak would affect the locals too, but I’d put money on it affecting the stinking Muslim masses in the streets much more…..

    • paul scott says:

      I’ve often thought of this. And quite frankly with a bit of trouble a virus or organism could be genetically tailored for certain genotypes [as in Arab]

  3. KG says:

    “..I’d put money on it affecting the stinking Muslim masses in the streets much more”
    http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yes.gif

  4. Heltau says:

    To random, it could take out a lot of the good people more than the bad people.
    Taking out the good people is to much of a risk for the well being of the humans on this earth.
    Plus we have a lot better medicine than they did in the 13th and 14th century. Plus better procedures to combat a plague.

  5. Ronbo says:

    Excellent topic and proven by history:

    In late 1941 FDR asked the Pentagon come up with a plan to defeat the Axis Powers – and Pentagon gave him the plan already brainstormed several years before. Roosevelt read it and said, “General Marshal, put the plan in operation and give me progress reports. Also, tell me what you need to defeat the Axis and you will have it.”

    History records the American side ran a textbook military operation in WW II, which ended in unconditional surrender and the occupation of the enemy homelands.

    In contrast, Hitler in 1941 took direct control of the German Armed Forces after a long series of brilliant “Blitz” victories that gave him control of most of Europe – and micromanaged the German military effort – and lost the war….big time.

    So based on the historical record, I think Trump doing a winning war game.