RFK

Could he be the only hope for redemption for the Democrat party? He certainly presents a problem for the Democrats and by extension the media. Is he one of the few increasingly rare Democrats left that has the integrity to point out the glaring evil in the party?

https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/bobby-steps-up/

I don’t agree with him on every issue, hell, I don’t agree with Trump on every issue, but I do believe his heart is in the right place, and I do remember that he stood up front and center and took the heat from the Covid cult while many on the right shrank away from the test.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to RFK

  1. Pascal says:

    Kennedys have been proven to be no problem for the deep state. They are either totally coopted, like Teddy, or else.

  2. Michael in Nelson says:

    As long as he is a Democrat, he will be overwhelmed by the Left. Trump’s success comes from engaging head-on when confronted with opposition. Conservatives tend to try to play nice and wind up getting played.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/04/phenomenal_a_talk_between_vivek_and_james_lindsay.html

  3. Michael in Nelson says:

    The Democratic Prty is beyond saving unless there is a major house cleaning.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/04/phenomenal_a_talk_between_vivek_and_james_lindsay.html

    They want to destroy the country and make life miserable for everyone.

    • Pascal says:

      The point brought up in this conversation — the complete subversion of all institutions by Leftism — was also touched on parenthetically by Glenn Reynolds 2 weeks ago. https://instapundit.substack.com/p/who-can-you-trust

      (Heinlein, a creature of his times, was a pretty big believer in institutions and professionalism. The past decade has largely served as a refutation of both. And even in his day, the institutions and professions were less trustworthy than we thought; it was just harder to find out when they were lying, sort of a meta-case of what I’m writing about here.)

      It was also touched on yesterday by Michael Wilkerson, author of “Why America Matters: The Case for a New Exceptionalism,” during Ed Bonderenka’s broadcast. A bit after 10:30 of the podcast he summarizes

      ‘the crisis of institution, the short version of which is our Federal government institutions are failing us across the board. They’re betraying the ideals of the American public. We’ve gotten to a place where they don’t trust us, and therefore we don’t trust them… this is a frightening place to be… where half the population is labeled as domestic terrorists it can’t end well.’

      This immediately brought to mind Robert Conquest’s Laws of Politics, particularly his third and last.

      The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.

      Conquest, in using the label cabal, implied the activities of the perpetrators would be clandestine and cautious. But if that ever were truly the case, then accepting the label merely made it easier not to confront any of those criminals who accidentally let their cloak slip a bit, avoiding the rebuke “How dare you imply our motives to be less than pure!”

      And the perps appear to have dropped their cloak completely and have become completely shameless in their refusal to acknowledge their behavior. See the shameless silence of Mayorkis in his Senate testimony. Or the shameless lying of the DOJ’s deputy AG to Senator Cruz in her hearing. “I don’t have the correct glasses to read that [The DOJ’s orders that Cruz projected on the screen].” And she proceeded, over and over and again, to claim she directed the exact opposite of the written instructions she claims she can’t read but that she authorized.

      I probably could write a whole blog post based upon the proof of how widely recognized the distrust of institutions has become. But who’d read it? Who’d pass it on?

      Well, I’ll let this comment suffice for now. I hope it at least provides proof to you and mawm and Darin on how widespread the recognition truly has become.

      • Michael in Nelson says:

        And the institution established to expose all that has been coopted to assist it, i.e. the media

  4. Michael in Nelson says:

    I posted in Open House above but it hasn’t appeared