The bruises and black eyes hadn’t even healed from the last time Trump took them to the woodshed and they tired it again. ![]()
![]()
![]()
The bruises and black eyes hadn’t even healed from the last time Trump took them to the woodshed and they tired it again. ![]()
![]()
![]()
PJW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTakuYq5R9k
Why am I not surprised?
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencealert.com%2Fmost-covid-19-deaths-may-be-the-result-of-a-completely-different-infection
And if I remember correctly, The US and NZ health systems banned the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 and instead told people to go home and of they got worse, put them on a ventilator. Legalised malpractice.
I would not be so hasty in condemning the use of ventilators. Sure, premature use will subject any patient with a respiratory illness to the known side effects. Any competent intensive care physician would recognise secondary bacterial infection and with laboratory guided antibacterial treatment most patients should recover.
That said, the CDC guidelines for the management of covid was early ventilation. Such proscribed management is criminal in my mind when supplemental oxygen and CPAP by mask would have been sufficient. Once the patient becomes so severely hypoxemic that the rate of breathing increases and if the compliance of the lungs (stiffness) increases (which it does) then the work of breathing (ie the O2 cost) increases and the patient enters a downward spiral and ventilation becomes necessary.
Michael I would call it culpable homicide. They knew Ivermectin worked. Preventing its use resulted in many deaths.
These guys are nutz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3yF5-OsijM
But, if given the chance, I would do it