Climategate II!

James Delingpole
‘..Here is a gloriously revealing string of emails in which activists and global warming research groups discuss how best to manipulate reality so that climate change looks more scary and dangerous than it really is:’
UPDATE:  Trueblue NZ has a great post on this–he’s as angry as we all ought to be.  I wonder if the braindead cheerleaders for the crypto-socialist NZ National Party will even acknowledge that the Nat’s slimy and duplicitous ‘Emissions Trading Scheme’ is based on a series of lies and is no more than a convenient vehicle to tax the productive still more?  Calling Adolf from ‘No Minister’……answer this, if you can.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Climategate II!

  1. The Gantt Guy says:

    Go Delingpole! Makes even more a joke of NZ’s Emissions Trading Scam and the Carbon Tax that wouldn’t be under a Government led by the Endangered Canberra Woodpecker!

    One question, from reading the email excerpts in Delingpole’s article… was the bureaucrat from the Department of the Environment really named ‘Humphrey’? Lends more weight to my long-held assertion that Yes Minister was a documentary!

  2. The Gantt Guy says:

    Oh, and Bolt now has it as well. Hope it gets legs, and this time there isn’t a whitewash like last time.

  3. Pingback: Outrageous- Newly Released Emails Finally and Completely Expose Climate Change as Politically Motivated Socialist Scam | TrueblueNZ

  4. Redbaiter says:

    Thanks for the link Keith-

    Snowed under with work at the mo, but the revelations in these emails really pissed me off.

    Those so called scientists are just left wing agents. The left wing has just got in everywhere, even science, and totally fucked everything up. Destroyed all that was ever good. Fucking evil.

  5. What’s the bet the MSM “miss” this, or more likely portray it as “evidence Big Oil and Big Coal are trying to kill us all”.

  6. Darin says:

    Shouldn’t I be allowed to sue the US government for establishing a religion since that’s all AGW theory is?

    • KG says:

      Good luck with that, Darin. The tame judges would find that you have “no standing” just as they do with anything else that confronts liberal orthodoxy.

  7. KG says:

    Hmm…nothing from Adolf, I see. He can be the Nat’s cheerleader-in-chief, but he can’t defend their ETS policy. :lol:

  8. Cadwallader says:

    Delingpole is wonderful at de-bunking this crap.

    To quote Carl Sagan: ” All science asks (us) is to employ the same levels of skepticism we use in buying a used car…”
    And: “The tools of skepticism are generally unavailable to the citizens of our society. They’re hardly ever mentioned in our schools, even in the presentation of science…”
    And “Those who have something to sell, those who wish to influence public opinion, those in power, a skeptic might suggest, have a vested interest in discouraging skepticism.”

    In Sagan’s book “The Demon Haunted World: Science As A Candle In The Dark” he observes how we have come to accept shoddy standards of evidence when addressing the passing fads of momentary hysteria. He didn’t live to see the climate crap we presently endure but I am sure he’d have been vitriolic in his critique of it.

    • KG says:

      Isn’t that a wonderful book Cad? I always admired the man.

      • Cadwallader says:

        You’re not kidding!
        I have tried to become an amateur physicist in later life and along with Sagan I truly admire Feynman, Planck and Cox. (Not to forget Ernest Rutherford.) I find the intelligent enquiry of physicists truly breathtaking and ask myself why we bother with the pointless trivia of politics when there is a huge and beguiling universe to ponder…endlessly. :!:

        • Cadwallader says:

          To quote Leonard Cohen: “We are so big against the sky but small between the stars!”

  9. Cadwallader says:

    Yet again: Freeman Dyson a British (now American) mathematician set out to establish that AGW was true, by way of applied maths. He found, instead, that mathematically even if all the fossil fuels on the planet were ignited in the same milli-second the heat generated by the conflagration would not alter the air temperature within earth’s atmosphere beyond the time of the firing. In other words, there cannot be a cumulative growth in air temperatures due to the burning of fossil fuels as the climate loons preach.