If babies, then why not toddlers?

‘..Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say
…..The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.
…..“To bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care.”
….The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article’s authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.
——–
Ah yes…the “burden on society” argument–which is why statists just love government health care. It gives them unlimited powers to interfere in the lives of the people. (And I’d argue that one of the biggest ‘burdens on society’ is the vast herds of parasitic academics.)
And: “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.?? These so called “ethicists” aren’t liberal fanatics? Pull the other one, you degenerate moral vacuum on legs. A “liberal society” in the sense you’re talking about has no fucking values. You’re anti-life, anti-freedom and anti-morality. Now piss off and euthanize yourself.