On the question of Gillard’s possible corruption:

Posted on August 19, 2012 by KG

From a very recent interview. via Andrew Bolt:
‘JG: Paul,(Kelly, journalist. kg) I’m not getting in to specifics about issues 17 years ago when you are not able to put to me any contention about why this is relevant to my conduct as Prime Minister today. I mean join the dots for me, Paul. What matters about this today for Australia and me being Prime Minister? Just articulate that.
PK: Well, I will. The point is that a partner in your former firm has made a series of allegations which go to your integrity.
JG: And the relevance to me being Prime Minister today, Paul?
Says it all, doesn’t it?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to On the question of Gillard’s possible corruption:

  1. The Gantt Guy says:
    August 19, 2012 at 17:21

    The answer to the question I asked here yesterday about pickeringpost.com being “suspended”, I saw this on Larry Pickering’s Facebook page:

    “pickeringpost.com has been consistently attacked via a DDoS for the past few days. We are now getting a “suspended” notice.

    Some of us don’t respond well to criticism…we are doing all we can to persist with free speech. Those who aren’t on the email list can go to lpickering.net (until they get at that site too)”

    Except of course the message on lpickering.net is now “We’re currently experiencing technical issues due to anomalies and high-volume traffic. Updates will be issued via the following Facebook pages”

    It’s the age-old adage – Progressives want Conservatives to Shut Up, and Conservatives want Progressives to keep talking!

  2. The Gantt Guy says:
    August 19, 2012 at 17:28

    And for those without Facebook accounts, here’s Larry’s latest on the AWU Scandal which will end the Gillard reign of terror:

    “Part VI
    IS OUR PRIME MINISTER A CROOK?

    … and why she refuses to comment.

    The can is now open and cannibalistic worms are sweating over who will devour who first. The five-part story so far, including accusations made on pickeringpost.com, now emerges as facts. Facts Gillard can no longer ignore.

    Slater & Gordon’s recent flurry of TV ads does little to restore its already shattered reputation. If they dump further on Gillard they risk Gillard dumping on them. There is a communal agreement to stonewall but, once that wall is breached, gunk will flow like a lanced boil.

    Gillard said, “I resigned voluntarily”. That is a lie.
    Gillard said, “I did not know what the accounts were for.” That is also a lie.
    Gillard said, “I had receipts for work done on my property.” That is a deception. She had receipts for maybe a new lamp-shade and a fancy soap-holder.

    Gillard says she can’t be certain that extorted funds weren’t used on her renovations. Mmmm.

    Nick Styant-Brown, of Slater & Gordon, called Gillard in for a taped interview regarding what she had been up to. Do partners of a major law firm do that to each other for fun? I think not.

    Styant-Brown said, “…the company took a very serious view of these and other matters and accepted her resignation”.

    “Took a very serious view” of exactly what, Julia?
    What exactly were these “other matters”, Julia?

    Gillard says, “I was treated very shabbily”. For what reason, Julia, do you believe you were treated “very shabbily”?

    Why did Slater & Gordon lend $130,000, in the form of a mortgage on the Kerr Street property, to Wilson? Wilson was an AWU Boss. The union would have been only too happy to supply a mortgage. Why go to the AWU’s law firm, Slater & Gordon? Why did Wilson get his girlfriend, Julia Gillard, to secretly facilitate the laundering of funds and why did Slater & Gordon hide this from their client, the AWU?

    Why wasn’t the AWU, informed of anything at all? Why didn’t they know of the fraudulent account Gillard set up in the AWU’s name? Why did it take the renovator’s invoices mistakenly turning up at the AWU before the scam was uncovered? Why was this kept secret if, as Gillard claims, there was nothing untoward.

    Why did Gillard disguise the true owner of the Kerr Street property by drawing up a power of attorney for Wilson to act on behalf of Blewitt? Why was Blewitt not told about the mortgage? Why was Blewitt not told where the proceeds of the sale went?

    Why did Gillard refuse to even open a file on this case?

    Why did Gillard rush into the AWU with receipts for her renovations if she thought there was nothing untoward?

    Slater & Gordon arranged, pro bono, the conveyancing on the Kerr Street property. (They say that is normal for valued clients of the firm.) Therefore they must know of the fraudulent funds and the fraudulent accounts?

    They must also know where the stolen funds came from and where they went to after the sale of the property? Did they not even ask or make a note of this?

    Slater & Gordon spuriously wants Wilson and Blewitt to waive privilege so they can produce these files. Mmmm… are there two people in Australia less likely to waive privilege without immunity?

    Where are Paul Howes’ files. Why has the AWU called off the dogs? Why won’t they cooperate with police? A Court ordered certain funds be returned to the AWU. So why does the AWU refuse to pursue those funds? Originally they demanded a Royal Commission! What has changed, Paul?

    Slater & Gordon are complicit and will eventually dump on Gillard to save their own skin. The prime Minister has insisted they make a statement supporting her. But they have already begun the process with a call to Styant-Brown.

    Gillard’s own Attorney General, Rob Mc Clelland, was the co-author of the damning Cambridge affidavit. Was he talking crap when he said, “…a third party may have benefitted from this.”

    When Slater & Gordon taped the interview with Gillard I would think the conversation went more like this:

    Gillard:
    Why are you treating me this shabbily? We are all partners! Why is it only me who has to resign? I’ve been here eight bloody years and this is what I get? It wasn’t just me, it was Murphy and Rothfield too!

    Slater & Gordon:
    Murphy is also going. We need to protect the firm.
    In seventeen years’ time, Julia, there will be others who will also insist you resign or be sacked.

    What will you do then Julia?

    [Part VII covers Shorten and the unions’ influence and further damning information from FOI. Also the history of the faceless men and how they run our Parliament without our knowledge and the way in which Slater & Gordon operates. There is so much more to this sordid little tale]“

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Larry-Pickering/236991276355038

  3. KG says:
    August 19, 2012 at 17:30

    On the DDOS attacks against Pickerings site, they really are a disgusting bunch of adolescent, whining ignorant wilfully stupid shit-heads. The thought of excrement such as this having a vote makes me puke. And makes a joke of democracy.

    • The Gantt Guy says:
      August 19, 2012 at 17:37

      Having the vote? They not only have the vote, the count the votes, they report the results and the are the ones getting voted for!!!!! They’re nothing more than a gang of far-left, communist, agit-prop treasonous scum, KG. They are a disgrace to this fine nation and its people. :gunner :gunner :gunner :gunner

  4. The Gantt Guy says:
    August 19, 2012 at 17:34

    Julia Gillard goes to a primary school to talk to the kids to get a little PR. After her talk she offers question time. One little boy puts up his hand and she asks him his name.

    ” Stanley ,” responds the little boy.

    “And what is your question, Stanley ?”

    “I have 4 questions:
    Why did you bring in a carbon tax when Australians didn’t vote for it.
    Second, why are you Prime minister when the Liberal Party got more votes?
    Third, weren’t you a communist at university.
    Fourth, why are you so worried about gay-marriage when you are obviously a lesbian

    Just then, the bell rings for recess. Julia informs the kiddies that they will continue after recess.

    When they resume Julia says, “OK, where were we? Oh, that ‘s right: question time. Who has a question?”

    Another little boy puts up his hand. Julia points him out and asks him his name.

    “Steve,” he responds.

    “And what is your question, Steve?”

    Actually, I have 6 questions.
    Why did you bring in a carbon tax when Australians didn’t vote for it.
    Why are you Prime minister when Tony Abbott got more votes?
    Third, weren’t you a communist at university.
    Fourth, why are you so worried about gay-marriage when you are obviously a lesbian
    Fifth, why did the recess bell go off 20 minutes early?
    And sixth, what the f… happened to Stanley?”

    • KG says:
      August 19, 2012 at 17:40

      It’d be very funny, if I didn’t believe we are inexorably headed in that direction….

      • The Gantt Guy says:
        August 19, 2012 at 17:47

        Of course. Anyone heard from Chris Smith, Glenn Milne or Matthew Franklin lately? One wonders if they’re undergoing treatment in the Ministry of Love!

  5. KG says:
    August 19, 2012 at 18:04

    It’s always “paranoia”….until it happens.