Don’t know how much I’ll be posting for a little bit. It’s back to the 7 day grind for awhile. Gotta pay those taxes so the government can live large at my expense.

Article: “Trust in Doctors and Hospitals Plummets”

Gee, wonder who caused that???

Trust in Doctors and Hospitals Plummets

I logged on to look at the local marketplace offerings today, it’s time for a new to me pickup truck and marketplace is the only reason I go there. While I was scrolling through the overpriced junk on offer, a thought occurred to me. How many parallels are there between the way Facebook is organized and ran and the way any western government is operated? Continue reading →

The hardest part of being in a labor union? Keeping the management from stealing everything in sight-

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-former-presidents-boilermakers-international-union-among-seven-indicted-20m-embezzlement

This is Hilarious

#TamponTim

I’ll say one thing, that Starmer is one ignorant smarmy cunt

After the Fagolymics opening ceremony , I decided I wasn’t going to watch any of it. Seems a lot of other people had the same idea. Enough that some advertisers dropped out enough to get the Olympic committee’s attention  and for them to issue this half assed apology.

https://x.com/OliLondonTV/status/1817683936182518207

After seeing this whole debacle, enough is enough, frankly I hope Islam takes over western Europe, at least they know the proper way to deal with mentally unstable sodomites and pedo’s

Predictions?

https://x.com/JoeBiden/status/1815087772216303933

The Story of Jake “McNasty” McNiece  Airborne Legend

SCOTUS just rolled back the most destructive tool belonging to the administrative state-

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/06/28/supreme-court-deals-massive-blow-federal-agencies-overrules-chevron-deference-loper-bright/

From the article-

The APA “specifies that courts, not agencies, will decide all relevant questions of law arising on review of agency action—even those involving ambiguous laws—and set aside any such action inconsistent with the law as they interpret it.” Roberts continued. “And it prescribes no deferential standard for courts to employ in answering those legal questions.”

“The deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with the APA,” the justices said. “In the decades between the enactment of the APA and this Court’s decision in Chevron, courts generally continued to review agency interpretations of the statutes they administer by independently examining each statute to determine its meaning.”

“Chevron, decided in 1984 by a bare quorum of six Justices, triggered a marked departure from the traditional approach,” the majority determined. “Neither Chevron nor any subsequent decision of this Court attempted to reconcile its framework with the APA.”

“Chevron defies the command of the APA that the reviewing court—not the agency whose action it reviews—is to decide all relevant questions of law and interpret statutory provisions,” Roberts found. “It requires a court to ignore, not follow, the reading the court would have reached had it exercised its independent judgment as required by the APA.”