Horsecrap–a big butt is a big butt.

behind‘ALABAMA high school teacher Bob Grisham has been banned from work after calling America’s first lady, “fat butt Obama”.
…”We should be outraged by these comments,” Sydney psychologist Louise Fuller told news.com.au.
“They are size-ist and discriminatory and out of line in exactly the same way that they would be if he targeted her gender or race.”…’
Bullshit–a fat ass has nothing whatsoever to do with criticisms based on gender or race. Facts are facts, and M.O. has a fat backside.

Tony Abbott…

the knives are out. He told it as he saw it, as did four other people. But that won’t stop the slimeball media doing Labor’s dirty work for them. Contrast the treatment given this story with their silence on Gillard’s corrupt behaviour.

The latest Woodpile Report is up

and –as always–Remus gets to the nub of the matter:
‘…All federal gun control acts, all state and municipal gun laws and all their enforcement provisions are illegal on their face. They are non-laws, indefensible and of no standing. Proposing and passing them into law was illegal, their ongoing enforcement is illegal. Legislation to mend parts of them is illegal because it concedes and endorses the illegal laws it seeks to modify. The only legitimate stance is complete repeal, root and branch, to be followed by indictments of those who broadened and extended them, and severance with prejudice for those prosecutors who enforced them, down to and including the Attorney General.
Appeals to the Supreme Court are also wrong, the court awarded itself the authority to rule on the Constitutionality of laws, it’s a power it does not have other than by acquiescence. The Bill of Rights was written by the people, in plain language. The Supreme Court can’t legitimately presume to speak in its place, rights which predate the republic don’t exist now only as they define them, they were recognized as-is by the same document that brought the court into existence, and of the two, the court is the lesser. Rights are the purpose of governance, the court is only part of the plumbing….’   (bold mine. kg)

Kiwis waking up to the maori scam

‘The Maori-Crown relationship is deteriorating in the eyes of the public. A UMR Research poll commissioned by the Human Rights Commission has found fewer than a quarter of New Zealanders agree the relationship is healthy.
The numbers have fallen for the fifth straight year.
Treaty relations
Poll: “The Treaty relationship between the Crown and Maori is healthy.”
2008 40 per cent agree
2009 28 per cent
2010 26 per cent
 2011 25 per cent 
2012 23 per cent
Source: HRC
‘…Race Relations Commissioner Joris de Bres said that being disapproving of Treaty relations was the one thing that brought all groups together – pro-Treaty, anti-Treaty, pro-Government and anti-Government.
“People are united in this one thing – that it isn’t good enough,” he said…’
What’s “not good enough” is that Key has left the loathsome, parasitical creep de Bres in place. A place that has no purpose other than to lecture and hector white New Zealanders into accepting the unacceptable.
The rest of this article goes on to propagandize in favour of the Treaty handouts, citing the views of academics and NOT ONCE does it point out the reasons Kiwis are increasingly disenchanted with the scam.
This NZ Herald article is propaganda, not journalism.