Obama, in his own words:

‘I just want you to know that we are working on [additional limits on gun ownership]. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.'”
And
““I don’t believe that people should be able to own guns,”     source
Adolf Hitler:
“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms…”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Obama, in his own words:

  1. oswald bastable says:

    Use them while you have them.

  2. Happy NEW Year-My Freedom Loving friends!!!
    Carol-CS

  3. Pix says:

    Never give up your weapons. You’re probably going to need them one day, registered or not.
    Happy New Year everyone. May it be prosperous, happy and healthy!

  4. KG says:

    $4m well spent. :lol:

  5. Robertvdl says:

    “Buried in the 1,200-page bill”

    As long as there are bills of more than 10 pages you know they are hiding something . And I don’t care what color the bill has. As long as it has more than 10 pages the system is rotten.

    Pelosi: “We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It”
    http://youtu.be/hV-05TLiiLU

    • Darin says:

      10 pages!Even that is too many,our founding documents don’t add up to ten pages.The Freaking Louisiana Purchase doesn’t contain ten pages,we bought 1/3 the continental land mass and it only took one page.

      So today we have a 83,000 page tax code,15,600 page NAFTA agreement,and the ever popular 2300 page “healthcare”bill,this after Ronald Reagan signed into law the paperwork reduction act.I swear if he hadn’t done that there wouldn’t be nary a tree standing in this country today.

  6. Robertvdl says:

    Obama Continues His Relentless Efforts To Dismantle The Constitution
    http://www.real-science.com/obama-continues-relentless-efforts-dismantle

    also is Real Science . com one of the best places if you like the truth about Climate Change.

  7. Robertvdl says:

    R.I.P. Bill of Rights 1789 – 2011
    http://www.infowars.com/r-i-p-bill-of-rights-1789-2011/

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      Here’s hoping, KG, although the SSC’s refusal to hear it is problematic at best (I’ll leave it to you to decide what it is “at worst”).

      If you take SCOTUS’ definition of Natural Born Citizen from Minor v Happersett, there’s no way BHO is legit. Problem is with possession being 9/10ths of the law, how do you get him evicted from 1600 Penn. Ave? Romney? Newt? I think not!

  8. KG says:

    It’d be interesting to find out if the court heard Minor v Happersett because the plaintiff was able to demonstrate “actual harm”, because the alleged lack of it is the reason most often cited for courts refusing to hear the case against Obama.

    • The Gantt Guy says:

      I’m gonna have a read through the whole decision this afternoon and see what’s in there (it’s 04 degrees here today and there’s no way I’m leaving the house!)

  9. KG says:

    :shock: 4 degrees??? Where are you right now, Tasmania?