Some of what passes for the “right” in Socialist New Zealand:

Posted on March 19, 2012 by KG

An ugly legend in it’s own lunchbox and the pack of sycophantic pro-sodomite jackals who follow it.
Foul little leftards, hitching a ride on whatever advances their “progressive” agenda.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Some of what passes for the “right” in Socialist New Zealand:

  1. dondiego says:
    March 19, 2012 at 00:58

    The only good was to see Redbaiter rip those idiots up. Not that the brainwashed are capable of seeing other points, dimensions.
    Almost engaged some American lefties on a blog I happened across- being accused of ‘tin-foil hat wearing’ aint quite as successful as ‘racist’, however it’s great to be complimented. :cool:
    I used to check his blog if a headline in Trueblue’s sidebar jumped out at me. This, after his expose on the imminent doom c/- kittens.
    Just another jive-talking propagandising detrimental no-hoper

  2. Redbaiter says:
    March 19, 2012 at 04:43

    Self professed ‘right wingers” and social liberals like Whale, Cactus and Farrar have been white anting the right for decades.

    You only have to read the link that Zen Tiger provided, and you can work it out. No matter what the right have tried, its all failed, and the left have an even greater grip on our throats today than what they have ever had.

    And its all down to white ants like those three. And the ideas they promote. And plenty of others supporting them.

    It took a while for me to twig to it myself, but I finally realised that the way the left have undermined our society, and succeeded in their mission to deconstruct it, is by means of social liberalism.

    Just like white anting treacherous left wingers cost us the Vietnam war, so the social liberals like Farrar, Cactus and Whale have lost us the cultural war.

    We’re in a decaying decrepit mess of a society that is by means of this decay weak and vulnerable, and easy meat for the socialist predators.

  3. Angus says:
    March 19, 2012 at 06:30

    When the “blog right” in NZ is represented by those three, circumstances are more dire than I first thought. Odgers and Slater are driven by narcissism and the quest for attention more than anything else, and Farrar, with this need to constantly prostrate himself to the circle-jerking Wellington beltway Left makes me wanna puke.

    Why Slater has adopted this gay marriage meme in recent times, interspersed with he-said, she-said postings about the Ports Of Auckland dispute, I don’t know . I wonder if National are unofficially vetting the idea in some way?

    • Octagongrappler says:
      March 19, 2012 at 16:11

      Odgers is a disgusting creature, Who has actually spent most of her time blogging about her sexual conquests :evil:

      • mawm says:
        March 19, 2012 at 17:16

        From the little time I have spent at her website it seems as if it is usually with married men. So she is not one who is likely to promote marriage, but more likely one to denigrate it.

  4. Redbaiter says:
    March 19, 2012 at 07:03

    “I wonder if National are unofficially vetting the idea in some way?”

    I wonder that too.

    It probably high on Key’s agenda.

  5. Ciaron says:
    March 19, 2012 at 07:04

    Sickening, isn’t it?

  6. The Gantt Guy says:
    March 19, 2012 at 07:04

    If I may make a suggestion, it would be that we express our disgust and then move on from discussing the Colonel Klink, over bloated Sergeant Schultz and Farulein Helga of the Left’s Army of New Zealand Occupation? :mrgreen: :oops: :censor

  7. Ciaron says:
    March 19, 2012 at 07:16

    Duly noted. :popcorn

  9. WAKE UP says:
    March 19, 2012 at 14:02

    The moment a blogger goes overground, he/she is hopelessly compromised. Farrar, Cactus and Whale are prime examples.

  10. WAKE UP says:
    March 19, 2012 at 14:04

    As for the homosexual marriage meme, I’ll take notice of those people when they stop hiding behind the hi-jacked word “gay” and start using “homosexual” and “queer”.

    • KG says:
      March 19, 2012 at 14:06

      Or unnatural or abnormal or aberrant….. :lol:
      Seriously, I have no problem with non-militant homosexuals. What I do have a problem with, is people pretending homosexual relationships are somehow equivalent to marriage between man and woman.

    • Cadwallader says:
      March 19, 2012 at 16:10

      I agree. The word “gay” is particularly inapt for lesbos. They seem to be generally sour and bitter rather than being anything close to happy and, yes, gay.
      Homo marriage seems ridiculous. It is enough that we are expected to be accepting of those who place their sexuality at the vanguard of their personas.

  11. Flashman says:
    March 20, 2012 at 04:22

    Good points lads.

    Farrer was on top of his game during the Klark Dark Ages. But quickly reinvented himself after the last election as a oily soft left praise singer. [Presumably this is the pragmatic thing to do to keep the cashflow running for his research company under the new regime?] I stopped reading his blog a couple of years ago.

    Slater [sadly] seems to have progressively lost his way in the last six months or so. He’s all over the shop like the madwoman’s breakfast these days.

    Odgers and her itchy little red button have never been my cup of tea.

    • Cadwallader says:
      March 20, 2012 at 12:52

      I agree Flash. I do not know that any of the three mentioned would necessarily see themselves as “right” I think it is more of a case that all others are “left.” In NZ as in Australia the pre-eminent parties are centrist which tends to make a mockery out of the “left/right” distinction anyway.