Eco-scammers

2 Responses to Eco-scammers

1. Fairfacts Media says:

   July 14, 2013 at 21:12

   James Delingpole did a great job in bringing this tale to the masses, though it first appeared under Christopher Booker’s column last Sunday with added explanation from the excellent Richard North.
   http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=84094
   The next day, Mr North appeared to have broken the dirty diesel angle.
   http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=84095
   And on Friday, we had how the UK government will even profit from the scheme, at the expense of energy customers.
   http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=84147

   Certainly this is a major scandal, highlighting the corruption of government and the so-called ‘Green’ movements.
   It comes as Germany has its troubles with its wind turbine industry, with so-called environmentalists now seeking the destruction of German forests to place their bird killing wind turbines.
   http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/wind-energy-encounters-problems-and-resistance-in-germany-a-910816.html
2. Robertv says:

   July 15, 2013 at 07:13

   http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/14/australias-carbon-tax-an-expensive-sop-to-the-greens/#more-89780

   “Under the Clean Energy Future package, there are several other programs to soften the Carbon Tax. A good example is the Steel Transformation Plan package.

   It is a $300 million package for our two steelmakers. Already payments of $164 million have been made, $100 M to BlueScope and $64 M to OneSteel.

   Now, what actually is the Carbon Tax obligation of these two companies? The LEPID database indicated a 2102-13 liability for BlueScope of 6.3 million Carbon Units. Yet, it has been granted 7.5 million free Carbon Units for 2012-13 under the ‘Jobs and Competitiveness Program’. If the LEPID information is correct, BlueScope is in front by 1.2 million units!”

   etc