Why not “marry” a donkey, or a dog?

Posted on August 18, 2013 by KG

As of tomorrow, homosexual “marriage” becomes legal in New Zealand, against the wishes of the majority of Kiwis.
This atrocity has damn-all to do with fairness and justice and everything to do with destroying one of the great impediments to the totalitarian dreams of the “progressive” scumbags.
Far from being a cause for pride and celebration, it’s a day of shame.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Why not “marry” a donkey, or a dog?

  1. Ronbo says:
    August 18, 2013 at 23:11

    What do America, England, France, Germany, Australia and New Zealand have in common?

    For one thing, in all these major Western countries, the majority rejected homosexual marriage – which, of course, is an oxymoron, as marriage is between a man and a woman. PERIOD :!:

    Like so much of the socialist – or should I say “fascist?” – agenda, “Gay Marriage” has been forced down the collective throats of Western Civilization by radical minorities of effete elite degenerates :!:

    The law, therefore, on “Gay Marriage” is, therefore, NULL AND VOID – and we freeborn men and women of the West are under no obligation to recognize such an arrangement :!:

    “I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.” —Robert A. Heinlein

    • KG says:
      August 19, 2013 at 06:55

      Sure did, Carol. I was so disappointed by it I didn’t trust myself to post on the subject. It would have degenerated into even more cussing than usual. :sad:

  3. GW says:
    August 19, 2013 at 03:03

    Gay marriage is, moreso than anything else, a tool being used to attack Christianity. Never forget that step one for the left is to dispense with anything that provides an alternate morality to their own. It is why destroying religion and moving it out of the public square has been the left’s goal since day one (which would have been about 1789, when one of the French revolutionaries opined that they should “hang the last priest with the intestines of the last king.”)

    • KG says:
      August 19, 2013 at 06:57

      I guess that’s true, GW. The attacks on the traditional family structure are just a facet of that.

  4. GW says:
    August 19, 2013 at 03:11

    I see your next post is on one of Mark Steyn’s pieces. That reminds me that Steyn, long ago, reviewed a book by Oriana Fallaci (sp?) discussing Ayatollah Khomeini’s teachings that he had published in what is commonly called, “The Blue Book.” It doesn’t touch on gay marriage, but it does discuss the Islamic view of sex with sheep. Enjoy:

    Signora Fallaci then moves on to the livelier examples of contemporary Islam — for example, Ayatollah Khomeini’s “Blue Book” and its helpful advice on romantic matters: “If a man marries a minor who has reached the age of nine and if during the defloration he immediately breaks the hymen, he cannot enjoy her any longer.” I’ll say. I know it always ruins my evening. Also: “A man who has had sexual relations with an animal, such as a sheep, may not eat its meat. He would commit sin.” Indeed. A quiet cigarette afterwards as you listen to your favourite Johnny Mathis LP and then a promise to call her next week and swing by the pasture is by far the best way. It may also be a sin to roast your nine-year-old wife, but the Ayatollah’s not clear on that. . . .

    I enjoy the don’t-eat-your-sexual-partner stuff as much as the next infidel, but the challenge presented by Islam is not that the cities of the Western world will be filling up with sheep-shaggers. If I had to choose, I’d rather Mohammed Atta was downriver in Egypt hitting on the livestock than flying through the windows of Manhattan skyscrapers. But he’s not.

  5. nominto says:
    August 19, 2013 at 17:46

    why can’t I marry this?
    he’s neat and tidy
    he’s multicultural [shades of brown]
    he’s strong and well endowed
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NXbG3ojeU

  6. Oswald Bastable says:
    August 19, 2013 at 18:03

    Hunting through Facebook, looking up ‘ex’s’- I appear to have avoided both :mrgreen:

  7. dondiego says:
    August 19, 2013 at 20:17

    I think a BIG part of this malicious crap that’s often over-looked is the socialist/communist wealth transfer:
    Marriage is ideal, for white people who thrived in family units within (relatively) free society. As well as the breakdown of passing on traditions and customs from IMO the greatest people ever- it leaves the door wide open for theft.

    Accumulated family wealth will no longer be passed from father to son etc. The other races in the r/k breeding strategy theory either don’t have dad around or even know who he is.
    If Hillary Clinton reckons “it takes a village to raise a child” then that village/state I’m sure will be more than happy to take worldly belongings and priceless knowledge.

  8. Contempt says:
    August 20, 2013 at 05:08

    Keep your lips off my lamb.

  9. RWT says:
    August 21, 2013 at 22:06

    For some reason this also keeps many a latte-sipping leftie out here awake at night. Among the myriad problems facing Australia caused by the labor-scum, the lefties in australia can’t seem to sleep at night thinking about the gay marriage issue.

    Most of us don’t really give a shit, they’re not discriminated against, they are allowed to marry, no matter how much they squeal and wail about it, us straight people are subject to the same restrictions as they are. What they really want is special rights.

    But like i said, we have far more serious problems facing the country than this minor issue.

  10. Octagongrappler says:
    August 22, 2013 at 11:19

    For the last 30 years Liberals have been saying marriage is out of date and that de facto is the way to go. Civil Unions are the same as marriage! So why do they suddenly want to get “married” all of a sudden??

    Why this sudden change and urge?? Well I guess it is to stick a finger in the face of a 3,000 year old tradition I guess!!