Poor science, or flat-out lies?

lomborg_models_too_hot_thumb‘Compared to the actual temperature rise since 1980, the average of 32 top climate models (the so-called CMIP5) overestimates it by 71-159% (see graph). A new Nature Climate Change study shows that the prevailing climate models produced estimates that overshot the temperature rise over the last 15 years by more than 300%.‘          source

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Poor science, or flat-out lies?

  1. Ronbo says:

    The hot air has just about all ran out on “The Leftist Great Global Hoax” – so being good drive-by environmentalist wackos after shooting up all their bullets – they reload with “The Leftist Great Ocean Acidification Hoax” and drive on to the next corner to let go a volley of lies:

    http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/2010/01/next-big-hoax-ocean-acidification.html

    ….and two years later this appears in the Leftist Seattle Times:

    http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/09/join-sea-change-reporter-craig-welch-for-live-chat-tuesday-at-noon/

    http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_unsure.gif

  2. KG says:

    ‘In a leaked June draft of the report’s summary for policymakers, the IPCC said that while the rate of warming between 1998 and 2012 was about half the average rate since 1951, the globe is still heating up. As for the apparent slowdown, it cited natural variability in the climate system, as well as cooling effects from volcanic eruptions and a downward phase in solar activity….’

    Hmmm…none of the computer models take solar activity into account…now, why would that be?
    Because to admit to the solar influence is to admit that their precious computer models are simply so much bullshit.
    And the globe IS FUCKING NOT “still heating up”.