‘..The true scientific method is founded on empirical observation. When a theory – whether embedded in a computer program or not – produces predictions that are falsified by subsequent observation, then the theory, and the computer models which enshrine it, have to be rethought.
Not for the IPCC, however, which has sought to obscure this fundamental issue by claiming that, whereas in 2007 it was 90 per cent sure that most of the (very slight) global warming recorded since the Fifties was due to man-made carbon emissions, it is now 95 per cent sure.
This is not science: it is mumbo-jumbo. Neither the 90 per cent nor the 95 per cent have any objective scientific basis: they are simply numbers plucked from the air for the benefit of credulous politicians and journalists…’
Leftists/”progressives”/socialists are not welcome here. Pay for your own soapbox.
Recent Comments
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 11/24/24
- Darin on Open House 11/24/24
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 11/24/24
- Darin on Open House 11/24/24
- Andy5759 on Maximum Cringe
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 10/25/24
- Darin on Maximum Cringe
- Darin on Maximum Cringe
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 10/25/24
- Amdy5759 on Maximum Cringe
- Michael in Nelson on Open House 10/25/24
- Edward Bonderenka on D.O.G.E. Department Of Government Efficiency
‘I believe that politicians, lawyers, busy-bodies and do-gooders are like salamis- greatly improved by hanging for a time.’ Oswald Bastable
- "The loss of freedom is like cancer; it will spread slowly but surely across all parts of society until our liberty has been utterly eaten away and we are left with nothing but a half-forgotten idea of what freedom was."
Meta
Unknown Feed
Blogroll
- "SPEAK FREE OR DIE"
- A Nation of Cowards
- AA Stoic Philosophy and the Profession of Arms
- AAAKIWI GUN BLOG
- AAAThe Misguided Advocates of Open Borders
- America's Ruling Class
- Australian Morning Mail
- BARBARIANS AT THE GATES
- Belmont Club
- Bill Whittle
- bluebird of bitterness
- Carol's Blog
- Cold Fury
- COLONEL B. BUNNY
- Common Cents
- Countenance Blog
- Daily Media Review
- Deringer Files
- DownTrend
- Ed Bonderenka
- European Civil War
- For Feminazis
- Freedom Fighter's Journal
- Freedom Outpost
- Gates of Vienna
- Gecko's pics
- Legal Insurrection
- Liberty's Torch
- Mad World News
- mawm (NZ)
- Morning Mail
- Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery (.pdf)
- Not of this World
- NZCPR
- ON GUN CONTROL
- On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs
- ONELAWFORALL.NZ
- Orphans of Liberty
- Oswald Bastable (NZ)
- Paladin's Page
- Pascal Fervor Blog
- PM of NZ
- Popehat
- Powerline
- Quadrant Online
- Real Science
- Right Truth
- Right Wing Theocrat (MK)
- Rough Diamond
- Sarah, Maid of Albion
- Sultan Knish
- Tamockcommanderie
- Terry's Blog
- The Conservative Co. NZ
- The Deringer Files
- The Destruction of Macquarie Island
- The Freedom Community
- The Threat We Face
- TrueBlue NZ
- Western Rifle Shooters
- Wolfhowling
- Woman Honor Thyself
- Woodpile Report
The single idea central to global warming is that temperatures will rise in direct proportion to increasing CO2 being pumped into our atmosphere. Some form of that ratio is included in every IPCC climate model. And since there has been no warming now for over 17 years, that’s a problem for the IPCC.
Two things stuck me about the IPCC summary released Friday. One, in a footnote, the IPCC admits that they can no longer agree on whether more CO2 will increase temperature by a nominal amount, a measurable amount, or a catastrophic amount. So, in regards to the 95% confidence level they claim, one has to ask, 95% of what?
The second thing that struck me was their claims that their models are not merely accurate, but “remarkably” so. Not a single model predicted the current warming hiatus – all project steadily increasing warming. At this point, temperatures are either wholly outside the projections or at the very bottom and likely to fall outside this year – in other words, complete failure. For the IPCC to claim complete success for their climate models is something that would make even Goebbels blush.
Lastly, given the lack of warming over the past 17 years, when asked at a press conference how long much longer of a “pause” would be necessary before the IPCC would declare their models a failure, an IPCC representative refused to answer, labeling the question “ill posed from a scientific point of view.”
These bastards will say anything to keep the money and power gravy train rolling. There really does need to be a reckoning. Tar and feathers is just not enough.
“These bastards will say anything to keep the money and power gravy train rolling.”
Well, yes.
They’re being well paid to lie in the service of another agenda.
And that agenda is a massive wealth re-distribution project from the West to the third world.
In addition, the process is enriching political cronies and giving politicians far, far greater control over the serfs, as well as helping destroy the hated middle class.
At least this AGW nut won’t be reproducing-
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2436551/A-weatherman-breaks-tears-vows-NEVER-fly-grim-climate-change-report.html
Maybe he doesn’t need a vasectomy afterall.
A vasectomy would be pointless anyway–the limp prick has neither balls or a brain attached.
Speaking of horsecrap–I want a highly-paid job producing this kind of stuff:
‘A large tsunami generated very close to the coast of New Zealand would arrive before warning sirens could be activated, a new report has found.”
No shit……
‘The Associated Press obtained documents that show the Obama administration and some European governments pressured UN climate scientists to downplay or even omit data that shows the world hasn’t warmed in over a decade’
http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/29/top-mit-scientist-un-climate-report-is-hilariously-flawed/
From Lucianne.com:
Have You Seen a Psychologist
About Global Warming Lately?
National Journal, by Amy Harder Original Article
Posted By: ketchuplover- 9/29/2013 9:50:52 PM Post Reply
If only we could find a couch big enough to fit the entire human species, we could talk through what within our minds is preventing us from acting more aggressively on global warming….