“Awful”? No, she was very restrained.

And behaving as a parent should.
Mum posts awful RSVP note to party hosted by gay dads
The note reads:
“Tommy will NOT attend. I do not believe in what you do and will not subject my innocent son to your ‘lifestyle’. I’m sorry Sophia has to grow up this way. If you have an issue or need to speak to me: [number erased].”…’
Well done, that mother. Now let the hate begin……
UPDATE:  It was a hoax  (Thanks, Liannth)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to “Awful”? No, she was very restrained.

  1. Michael in Nelson says:

    I agree with the mother. It’s a good thing the child having the birthday is a girl.

  2. Redbaiter says:

    Check this for more in the same vein- Facebook now allows users choice of fifty categories to describe sexual orientation.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2558768/APNewsBreak-New-gender-options-Facebook-users.html

    How did we ever get by with just two??

  3. Mathew says:

    Maybe she didn’t have to put the “NO” like that, fair enough, but then the gays didn’t have to go running to the media crying and wailing either. Such a bunch of wankers, at the smallest bit of insensitivity sent their way, they go running like a bunch of bitches to the teacher.

  4. Mathew says:

    I left a post on their facebook page calling them soft. :twisted:

  5. Findalis says:

    I wonder to which pedophiles they are selling little Sophia to.

  6. Wombat says:

    “No”, would have sufficed.
    And RSVP request is not a soap-box to bitch from.

    “I will NOT attend. I do not like the way you dress in public and the way you talked to my husband at the checkout the other day. I have serious reservations that you are a home-wrecker. If you have an issue or need to speak to me: [number erased].”…’

    There. You see how stupid that sounds? Not newsworthy, by any means, stupid none-the-less.

    • KG says:

      Nope, Wombat. The circumstances cannot be compared.
      One is concerned with the welfare of her child. The other….?

      • Wombat says:

        I stand my ground on this one. Not newsworthy, but still a stupid thing to do. If my kid’s mate asked him to a birthday party and my kid’s mate’s parents were druggo fuckwits I wouldn’t return the RSVP with my personal thoughts on their child raising capabilities.

        I’d just say “no”, because an RSVP is no more an invitation to criticism than is crossing paths with somone in the street, and if I insisted on telling everyone I crossed in the street what I thought of them I’d never make it half a bloody block. Civilised society doesn’t invite random confrontations over personal grievances. It’s simply not cricket.

        Likewise, if I had an RSVP that said “Little Rainbowapple will NOT attend your party because you support a military imperialist regime which blahblahblah…” I would tell them the same. Just reply yes or no for fucks sake. It’s not a fucking facebook page.

        • andy5759 says:

          True, seein. Dignity, is often all that is required. My old man said, if you can’t say anything good, say nowt.

          • KG says:

            Oh, right. Great advice, that. So we’ll avoid saying anything about Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot and Obama, eh? Not to mention thugs, rapists and conmen…
            As idiot cliches go, that’s right up there.

            • Wombat says:

              As you recall, you vote.
              If that doesn’t work out, you secede.
              If that doesn’t work out you leave or you start shooting.

              All the bitching hasn’t added up to a pinch of shit. It just feeds the beast.

  7. KG says:

    “Civilised society doesn’t invite random confrontations over personal grievances.”
    But it’s not a personal grievance, is it?
    And a minimal response to an RSVP is not necessarily a requirement–RSVP merely means “reply if you please” as I understand it. How much is written in that reply is merely a convention, not a rule.
    She replied. :twisted:

    • Wombat says:

      “Respondez s’il vous plait”, yes.

      But when your little capitalised and underlined “NOT” grows into a snakey explanation that slithers over onto the back page with the help of a guiding arrow then you’ve started to cross a few boundaries that would have gotten you tossed so far out of etiquette school that you’d have landed in a different post-code. It even ends in some kind of schizophrenic olive branch with the leaving of her number in case they want to, who-the-fuck-knows, have a little chat about how much she hates them?

      You don’t get the old days back by acting like an inner city high-schooler that’s suddenly realised she’s got to “stick it to those fags”.
      Well done. Now Tommy will be under a microscope until the end of time and the gay union have more fodder for their grievance machine.

  8. KG says:

    Actually, given the recent cases featuring homosexual men who have adopted boys in order to rent them out to abusers, I think any invitation from a homosexual couple to parents to leave their kids in their charge is an effing nerve.

    • andy5759 says:

      The fellas done up as Rod Hull’s Emu? Happy diddly times. Wring that birds neck. :twisted:

    • Mathew says:

      Valid point, i know mentioning such things in public will have them running to the nearest grievance outlet to wail about their precious hurt feelings and all that, but one has to look out for your children.

      • KG says:

        I guess it depends on whether one is prepared to be cowed by these bastards or not, Mathew.

      • Wombat says:

        The megaphone doesn’t protect your children. It does the opposite. It singles them out for extra indoctrination to “repair the damage their parents are doing”.

        Now little Tommy is going to suffer the consequences for mummy’s outburst. One more reason to home-school and live among like minds, rather than mingle with those you despise and then complain when the world fails to sanitise itself to your standards.

        Like I said.
        Vote with your pen, your feet or your fists. THAT is how you preserve your culture. Flipping off the opposition is an impotent and childish gesture for which your children will pay the price.
        Put up or shut up. That is the way of old.

        • KG says:

          We’ll have to agree to disagree on this.
          I think it’s important to speak up and oppose certain things at every opportunity, because silence is too often regarded–and used by the enemy–as tacit approval.
          And there are too damn many “good” reasons for not speaking up, until silence becomes compliance.
          Fuck that.
          The day I fail to speak my mind in the name of self-preservation is the day I’ll know I’ve become just another gutless drone, shuffling along with eyes downcast to avoid attracting the attention of the nearest kapo.
          Now, where’s the nearest windmill……. :twisted:

          • Wombat says:

            I understand where you’re coming from, but you’re talking to a guy who believes the time for words came and went decades ago. In fact, I’d say it finished right around the 1996 mark, optimistically speaking, when our so called conservative party gutted any possible illusion that we were free men.

            Libertarians and/or conservatives are now living in occupied territory. There is now as much point in speaking out against evil and stupidity as there would be for a Jew to pop out of an attic in Berlin while the tanks were rolling through Poland and shout “hold on just a god-damned second!”

            All we can do now is steel ourselves for what comes next. We all know it’s coming, whether we accept it or not. It will either come in the form of a collapse of society, or, the worst kind of regime imaginable to those living today, right on par with Orwell’s 1984.

            So no, I don’t see any point whatsoever in sending nasty RSVPs to gays. I’d rather string some more barbed wire around my fence line and set up another cache on my evac route. One sees concrete results. The other (at this late stage) is like pissing in the wind.

          • Wombat says:

            p.s. The exception would be to build local tribe or community. It’s a little hard to do that under a vow of political silence.

  9. differ says:

    Wondering when the local authority will step in and force the kid to attend…..like they did for that bakery in AZ who refused to supply cake to gay wedding..Otherwise mostly agree with Wombat’s points…time for talk is long past.

  10. Lara says:

    madness. Yep, one day the authorities will force it, speaking out against gays will be a hate crime. Not attending will be a hate crime. Our freedoms are going……

    • Wombat says:

      I don’t like to be an armchair expert, but it had crossed my mind…

      As usual the lie crosses to the other side of the earth before the truth has a chance to get out of bed.