28 thoughts on “The Camp of the Saints”

  3. Thanks, Gantt. No wonder the leftards hated the book….too close to the truth.

  4. Got it. Rather than create a login, I copied and pasted it to text edit and saved it as a pdf. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_smile.gif

      • I’m not at all sure optimism shouldn’t join progressive liberalism in the family of delusional mental disorders. To maintain an optimistic outlook in the face of the decay and destruction, deliberately wrought, which is all around us, one must be either out of ones fucking mind, or smoking the good stuff morning till night.

        • I would imagine to the British after the fall of France in 1940 the future looked even more bleak, as your last major ally had bit the dirt, and nothing but a few miles of English Channel between you and the Nazi Death Machine.

          The weatherman cannot say with 100% accuracy what the weather will be like in 24 hours, because the weather patterns are too complex – likewise we cannot know what will happen in human events even one day in advance due to vast numbers of variables in play.

          How many times have we booted up the computer in the morning to check out the news and said to ourselves, “Damn, I didn’t see that coming!”

    • I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

      We have it so good these days. Centuries ago white man had to travel hundreds of miles in rickety wooden boats on treacherous seas to get a chance at putting a few stone age savages to the steel.

      Nowadays in the age of conveneince we have had the foresight to install enemy encampments right next door. Soon we will be able to start the crusades anew, battling heretics by day and still enjoying the comforts of home by night.

      Personally I think you lot are ungrateful brats. You just refuse to see the bigger picture. http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

          • @Wombat:

            Now that’s the right Crusader spirit :!: :mrgreen:

            I can see you are aware the importance of interior lines of defense.

            For example, why were the Bolsheviks successful in the Russian Civil War of being off superior number of attackers come at them in all directions?

            Simple.

            The Reds held the interior lines of defense in a circle around Moscow and were able to shift troops around to counter attack in superior numbers the breakouts by the Whites.

            Thus a smaller and badly supplied force defeated many times their numbers and was able to crush one attack after around until the Whites were forced into retreat and defeat.

            The same is true today in a general way – there has been a surge forward by the enemy but still hold the interior lines.

            For example, in the United States the strong points of the Left are in the Northeast and along a narrow strip of the Pacific coast. The interior lines are Rightist strong points in 35 so-called “Red” states in the South and Southwest.

            If an American civil war 2.0 breaks out the rebels can move forces against around on interior lines and mass superior numbers against Leftist attacks.

            In regards to troublesome minorities like the Muslims and urban ghetto blacks. The upside is that these people are usually concentrated in urban areas that are surround by “Red” held territory. Hence, they are easily surrounded and starved out by rebels who control access to the cities and can cut off the electric, gas, food and water.

            I ask you how long can a major city’s urban core last if all access to the outside is cut off…A week? Two weeks?

            • That is the single most important factor to keep in mind. Our enemies are nicely concentrated in urban areas with, at best, two days wurf of rations and a full tank of gas. Easy to starve out. Easy to bottle up. Next!

            • in the United States the strong points of the Left are in the Northeast and along a narrow strip of the Pacific coast.

              It sounds as if Obama is doing his damnedest to have the southern states overrun with mass “migration” from Mexico and thus become leftist.

            • They can alter the overall demographic, but a locality doesn’t “toggle” from left to right.

              The relevance of the voting majority is a historical abstract. All that really matters is who holds the majority of the bullets and the balls.

      • Centuries ago, Wombat, white men got into rickety boats and brought civilisation to other continents – and were despised as colonists. Now the mass of those continents are invading the white countries and destroying their civilisation – and are lauded as multicultural migrants.

        • “Now the mass of those continents are invading the white countries and destroying their civilisation – and are lauded as multicultural migrants.”
          Exactly.

        • I’m married to an immigrant who’s a very pleasant shade of brown. She came here with her folks two decades ago fleeing Communism and they’ve been far more quietly productive than most Aussies I know.

          The determining factor is not their colour but that they were raised Catholic, and not brought up under a death-cult masquerading as a religion.

  6. A domestic war, if it comes won’t be won (and lost) by opposing armies of whatever conventional nature.
    If the rebels are to win it’ll be by carefully planned civil action (utilities employees sabotaging power generation and supply, telecommunications employees doing something similar, etc.) and very carefully targeted, widespread killing of key government and bureaucratic individuals.
    In other words, planned de-stabilisation of the underpinnings of civilisation in selected areas.
    Make the country simply un-governable until the government of the day agrees to a list of demands.
    Minimum: Return to a Constitutional Republic and repeal of all laws and regulations which violate the Constitution.
    Term limits for politicians.
    Remove the ability of government agencies to make regulations.
    All politicians to be audited by the (reformed) IRS and the findings to be made public.
    Nobody on welfare allowed to vote.
    Close the borders and deport all illegals.
    Publicly flog Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Penn.

    • “Limited Government, Unicorns and Other Mythological Creatures”.

      Zerogov has it right.

      That said, government has always existed on some scale and always will.

      I simply contend that power should roll downhill, not up. Power and revenue structure currently flows from federal to state to council. IMO the easiest fix for most of our problems is simply to flip it.

      Councils draw their revenue from the locals.
      States draw their revenue from the councils and exist only to provide a platform for intercouncil relations and voluntary standardisation.
      The Federation draws its revenue from the states and exist only to provide a platform for interstate relations and voluntary standardisation.

      In reality, what you’re looking there is a smaller scale of Europe prior to the globalists getting involved. Currently, bribing a few top end officials is extremely easy for a corporation. It’s why government hates small businesses. Because it’s hard to organise bribes from 10,000 individual owner operated hardware stores but easy to organise them from, say, the CEO board of Bunnings.

      The solution is just to do the opposite of what we’ve been boing for the last hundred years.

      Break it down. Make it smaller.

      After all, your most powerful elected representatives are less likely to f#*k you if you live down the street from them.

  7. Col. Bunny, I’d suggest that the enemy would not be easy to bottle up. Any rebel forces would be relatively few and the manpower necessary simply not available across a sufficient number of cities. And what’s more they’d be easy targets themselves against government forces armed with drones, satellite imaging and air power.
    And what to do with thousands of people starved out of urban areas?
    Target the nodes of power. That is, powerful and influential individuals and their sources of support.
    Strike and disperse. Rinse and repeat.
    Make the country ungovernable.
    That also means urban blacks and leftist rioters would become the targets of government forces – which would do that job for you.

    • Many men would need to sacrifice their lives for freedom and, quite frankly, I don’t think that many men living in warm houses with a ready supply of food and energy are willing to give up that.

      • That’s my estimation too, Mawm. Freedom is an abstract concept to most people until the comfort level drops sufficiently..and by then it’s too late.

        • Geo-Political Darwinism.

          Ant vs Grasshopper.

          The response will have to be adapted to the trigger. Let the welfare classes cannibalise the collectivist scumbags that created them.

          Drop anyone that leaves the battlefield and starts heading in your direction.

          Know when to bail out and move to higher ground. Have the resources in place to survive there. Retake lost ground when it becomes possible.

          Assuming you survive those phases, let your children’s children suffer no collectivist to ever live with the range of their domain.

          You’ll struggle to acchieve that much, letalone some sort of greater outcome.

  8. And there has to be some way of dealing with the Idiot Media. This headline in today’s News.com:
    ‘ FORGET ABBOTT: This is the powerful Aussie you may not know about
    HE’S about to become our most important leader…’

    Who is he? The captain of the Aussie football team, fer gawdsakes!!

    GIGO……

Comments are closed.