Why not just have feminazi lynch mobs?

Posted on September 17, 2014 by KG

And only female judges hearing rape cases?
‘Rape myths do the most damage when they show up among jurors – and for that reason, juries should not be part of sexual assault trials, Louise Nicholas says.’
Because judges in NZ have been shown to to be utterly impartial, unbiased and fearless upholders of the principles of justice, right?
Right?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Why not just have feminazi lynch mobs?

  1. Mathew says:
    September 17, 2014 at 07:27

    “The anti-rape advocate believes…….”

    Why does she go by that, are there pro-rape advocates, is everyone else just pro-rape, or is this some nuanced way of saying, i’m better than all you low-class shits out there?

    “You need to ask what has happened, because you can guarantee it that that person has been too scared to say that it was my father or it was my brother. It’s much easier to say it was a mate, it was my boyfriend.”

    Prior to this bit she was saying there definitely are women out there who falsely accuse others of rape. So in her books when such false allegations happen, they’re not really false, a rape must have happened and someone, anyone must be found guilty.

    Oh and by the way, she did bring rape allegations against the police in the past but the jury acquitted them, so there is a rather large and heavy axe involved in all this.

  2. KG says:
    September 17, 2014 at 10:23

    “…so there is a rather large and heavy axe involved in all this.”
    There sure is!
    And plenty of useful idiots ready and willing to help her grind it.

  3. Cadwallader says:
    September 17, 2014 at 11:45

    The NZ Labour Party recently promoted that the burden of proof be reversed in rape cases…”You did it because I say you did!” This sort of dangerous and idiotic behaviour is bred from feminist militancy rather than any sense of fair play. Despicable really.