The imperial President:

Posted on November 21, 2014 by KG

‘President Obama will head to Nevada to sign an executive order granting ‘deferred action’ to two groups of people — the parents of US citizens or legal permanent residents who have been in the country for five years, and young people who were brought into the country illegally as of 2010 — which could involve nearly 5 million of the estimated 11 million people living in the country illegally…’    Link
and:
‘On Thursday night, President Obama delivered his address to the nation on his executive amnesty. It was historic, both in its scope and in its dishonesty: the speech represented a closely-woven and incredible tapestry of falsehood, exposited with a straight face by the greatest liar in modern American history.’
Breitbart
American voters have just overwhelmingly rejected Obama, the Democrats and any suggestion of amnesty, yet this arrogant prick is pushing ahead and ruling by decree. He’s a dictator in all but name.
Dictators have a history of coming to a sticky end and I for one pray that happens to the undocumented racist asshole squatting in the White House.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to The imperial President:

  1. Michael in Nelson says:
    November 21, 2014 at 17:16

    KG,

    While I detest the HBSC, I would not want to see him become a martyr which is what would happen if he is assassinated. He should be tried and convicted of treason and incarcerated for the rest of his unnatural life.

    • mawm says:
      November 21, 2014 at 17:48

      Gaol’s too good for him. Some communist hell-hole, re-education gulag would be more like it.

    • KG says:
      November 21, 2014 at 17:49

      I’d prefer him as martyr than a one-man wrecking crew, Michael.

      • Seneca III says:
        November 21, 2014 at 20:43

        Wistful thinking, I know, but my mind is full of the gorgeous though of a combined solution – why not the Gulag first with a couple of years earning his daily food based on a tonnage output of spoil whilst digging mineshafts with a teaspoon, all followed by his final re-education lovingly delivered by a firing squad using BB guns over the course of several hours?

  2. Francis W. Porretto says:
    November 21, 2014 at 20:43

    Thus, in a single stroke, the port of entry laws, the borders of the United States, the supremacy of the Constitution, and the rule of law itself are challenged, without an effective rejoinder from Congress, by the man who, as a presidential candidate, railed against the expansion of the powers of the presidency.

    The great Gilbert Keith Chesterton emitted many an incisive statement, but the one dearest to me is this:

    “There exists… a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I do not see the use of this; let us clear it away.” To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer, “If you do not see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it…”

    Some person had a good reason for thinking (the gate or fence) would be a good thing for somebody. And until we know what the reason was, we cannot judge whether the reason was reasonable. … The truth is that nobody has any business to destroy a social institution until he has really seen it as an historical institution. If he knows how it arose, and what purposes it was supposed to serve, he may really be able to say that they were bad purposes, that they have since become bad purposes, or that they are purposes which are no longer served.

    But if he simply stares at the thing as a senseless monstrosity that has sprung up in his path, it is he and not the traditionalist who is suffering from an illusion…” [from The Thing]

    Barack Hussein Obama apparently never contemplated that.

    • Ronbo says:
      November 21, 2014 at 22:28

      As anyone who has read my blog or my comments here will know that since 2005, I’ve said the conflict between American patriots/republicans and the Progressive Left could only be settled by violent means.

      Furthermore, a purge of Leftists from all institutions must take place and these traitors, executed, exiled, or given low wage jobs such as dishwashers. Of course, all their wealth would be seized by the Commonwealth and divided among their victims in equal shares.

      Too harsh, you say :?: I would remind the gentle reader that Leftist leaders have for years bragged that upwards of 25 million patriots must be send to death camps in the event of their seizure of power. What comes around, goes around.

      We should always remember that Obama did not create the Leftist revolution – it created him. There are millions of Leftist traitors who need to be crushed under the iron heel of patriotism. This is the reason why I’ve called for a ten year Commonwealth to enable a ruthless purge of the Left from America.

      Hey, it worked Oliver Cromwell the king killer after the English Civil War was concluded…

    • KG says:
      November 22, 2014 at 02:21

      Because he’s not yet an adult, Francis but a spotty resentful youth who has been handed the keys to something he has no use for.

    • David says:
      November 22, 2014 at 09:53

      Facts are horrible things, aren’t they?

      All The President is doing is using the powers granted to him by Congress.

      He is using the same powers, in the same way as G W Bush did and in the same way the “Saint” Ronald Reagan did, but I didn’t notice you lot going out of your tree over those presidential decrees.

      Even the legal scholars at The Federalist Society, a band of conservative lawyers, agree that Obama is only using powers he has been granted by Congress.

      The money shot quote is:

      If Congress wants to restrain the discretion of the president, they are supposed to do what the separation of powers encourages them to do: Write the statute tightly so that it will be actually administered the way you want it administered,” Baker said. “The reality is many members of Congress don’t care how it is administered until somebody squawks about it. They don’t read the statutes, so how do they know how it is going to be administered.”

      Followed by:

      “Sometimes Congress will pass resolutions when they don’t want to do anything, but they want to tell voters they’ve done something,” Baker said. “So i don’t think much of resolutions. It is about power, and the power is in the money, and [Rep. Paul] Ryan and others have said, ‘We are going to stop you from implementing this through the power of the purse.’ That’s about the only thing they have at this point.”

      Facts, such pretty things.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/18/federalist-society-obama-immigration_n_6182350.html

      • KG says:
        November 22, 2014 at 11:04

        Hahahaha! Anybody quoting Huffpo is not an honest person.
        Fuck off, along with your selective choice of “facts”.

        • Darin says:
          November 22, 2014 at 11:43

          Another smug arsehole lefty,his attitude will change when the border states start enforcing immigration law themselves which the SCOTUS has already ruled twice that they are allowed to do.

          It will also be interesting to see what happens when we cut off foreign aid to Mexico and all of central America.Bottom line you think you have won,but you have only begun to lose.

          BTW ,I do hope you have a learning experience with an illegal alien soon :twisted:

      • mawm says:
        November 22, 2014 at 12:06

        David you are a dishonest little prick. You know that both Reagan and Bush Snr, and I’m assuming that you specifically mention them because of the amnesty they granted to illegals, only did so once Congress had sent them the Bill to do so. Your favorite burst arsehole has done it despite Congress indicating they did not want Executive action on amnesty. But that is what you get when you have an immature vain person elected to a position way beyond his ability to handle.

  3. mawm says:
    November 22, 2014 at 04:35

    The GOP does not have a clue how to respond to Obama! What a bunch of wet pussies.

    How do you remove a negative ie. a law not being enforced? You can’t. But you can make it very difficult for Obama – stop funding him, his wife, their servants, and their cars. Stop funding his security, and Jarret’s and Mooch’s. Ground his fleet of aircraft by defunding them. Take away his armoured car….by defunding it.

    Next, take his illegal presidency away from him – chase after his fake birth certificate, his illegal nomination for presidency, his illegal social security number, etc.

    Challenge his every appointment. Take away his palace guard.

    Let him know at every turn that he is being obstructed. And let him know that he is likely to sit out his post presidency in a cold concrete room for crimes committed.

    • The Gantt Guy says:
      November 22, 2014 at 04:44

      Absolutely agree, mawm. They should become the party of “No” they’ve been accused of being for the past 6 years.

      MAWM for Speaker of the House!

      But, one thing. Tits on a bull are useless. Tits on a fish are useless. Tits on The Gantt Guy? Pretty must useless. But wet pussies? As a medical professional, if you think wet pussies are useless then either (a) I’ve been doing something wrong for a looooong time, or (b) you maybe need to go back and read your biology text books? http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_rose.gif

  4. andy5759 says:
    November 22, 2014 at 08:44

    Listening to the latest POTUS of Irish descent – Baz O’bummer – makes me think of a dry BJ. Sorry, sewer mouths again.