The enemy, in plain sight:

  A front-page article in a major Brit newspaper:
‘Scorning the Prophet goes beyond free speech – it’s an act of violence
The Paris murders aside, the law has a duty to protect us all from insult and abuse
By Abdal Hakim Murad..’  (bold mine)
Words almost fail….that a Western news outlet would give prominence to such a sly piece of propaganda and dishonesty indicates cowardice and moral bankruptcy, not enlightened tolerance.
The word “enemy” in the title doesn’t only refer to the writer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The enemy, in plain sight:

  1. Ronbo says:

    The British Telegraph Newspaper can go kiss my rosy red anti-Muslim ass :!: :evil:

    In fact, I’m so offended by this absurd article that if were in London I’d track down the author of this POS article and kick his fucking ass :!:

    Maybe if I did kick some butt, the chicken shit Leftist Media would start being afraid of anti-Muslim Right and shut up their stupid fucking mouths about the fucking Arabian death and suicide cult they obviously know fucking nothing about.

    • KG says:

      The frightening thing is that such a piece belongs as satire in The Onion, yet a culture under sustained attack by a violent ideology sees fit to give utterly alien and destructive views such as these a veneer of respectability! http://falfn.com/CrusaderRabbit/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_unsure.gif

  2. mawm says:

    Sly it certainly is.

    Firstly Britain is a secular society so people have the choice of obeying the Ten Commandments or not. The Law is a different matter.

    Secondly the Ten Commandments come from the Hebrew Bible and islam most certainly does not follow or use the Bible in its teachings and practice. Instead the koran has its own version of commandments from allah in sura Al-An’am 6:151:

    “Say: “Come, I will rehearse what Allah hath (really) prohibited you from”: Join not anything with Him; be good to your parents; kill not your children on a plea of want;- We provide sustenance for you and for them;- come not nigh to indecent deeds. Whether open or secret; take not life, which Allah hath made sacred, except by way of justice and law: thus doth He command you, that ye may learn wisdom. And come not nigh to the orphan’s property, except to improve it, until he attain the age of full strength; give measure and weight with (full) justice;- no burden do We place on any soul, but that which it can bear;- whenever ye speak, speak justly, even if a near relative is concerned; and fulfill the Covenant of Allah. thus doth He command you, that ye may remember.” (from Wikipedia and bold is mine).

    I see nothing about false idols.

    Maybe this British (sic) muslim theologian should be preaching to his kind about killing, lies and deception, wrapping their kids with explosives and sending them off to bus stations and markets and to stop f**king goats. I see nothing about false idols.

  3. Wombat says:

    -“In the case of vulnerable minorities that legal concern seems particularly appropriate.”

    Number of Muslim journalists murdered in the last month?
    We should all be lucky enough to be so “vulnerable”. :roll:

    • Wombat says:

      p.s. No apparent comments section. Why am I not surprised…
      I guess they don’t want the vulnerable minority to have his pwecious fweeling hurt. :lol:

      • KG says:

        It’s no longer safe to have people criticise a muslim in comments, Wombat. Not in Britain, where they are a protected species. :evil:

        • tranquil says:

          Yeah, I noticed the lack of a comments section too.

          What utter *BS* this guy is spouting about government having a “responsibility” to protect people from being “offended”.
          We already see the results of this in the UK and Europe where even people who quote the Koran and its violent verses face jail time for being “offensive”.