‘The Imaginary Islamic Radical’

Posted on by

Daniel Greenfield:
‘..If ISIS is extreme and Islam is moderate, what did ISIS do that Mohammed did not?..’
And who among the Western apologists for islam can answer that question?

4 thoughts on “‘The Imaginary Islamic Radical’”

  1. ISIS are simply being DEVOUT MUSLIMS :!: DUH :!:

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MODERATE MUSLIM :!: :!: :!: :evil:

    In fact, the term “moderate Muslim” is an oxymoron and tantamount to saying, “He is a gentle Christian murderer.”

  2. “Moderate” muslims are sadly just “fashionable” muslims (or “I don’t want to be killed by the devout muslim” muslims). That’s not to say that I wish they’d all start killing infidels.

    I’d rather they pull their heads out of their asses and toss their korans into the rubbish.

  3. *Excellent* article!

    Another very good one here –
    http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2015/01/how-do-we-know-if-religion-is-peaceful.html

    Quote – “A Canadian professor of marketing has a blog on Psychology Today. His name is Dr. Gad Saad. In a recent blog post he asked the question, “How do we know if a religion is peaceful?” His article is well worth reading for a couple of reasons. First, it is published in a magazine that epitomizes political correctness and multiculturalism. And the analysis he lays out is brilliant, logical, unbiased, scientific, and published on a site that is about as far from being a counterjihad site as a site can be.”

    In a nutshell, the article is mostly about analysing the source texts of islam.

    Utterly obvious and common-sense, yes, but the fact that at least it is in such a “PC” magazine is noteworthy.

  4. “Our problem is not the Islamic radical, but the inherent radicalism of Islam. Islam is a radical religion.”

    Precisely! Those two simple sentences should be beaten into every lefty apologist and appeaser. Then they might desist with their excuses, hair-splitting and pin-head dancing.

Comments are closed.