‘Gay rights activists to Christians — surrender, or else
‘A few years ago I hosted gay activist attorney Andrea Ritchie on my radio program and asked her whether she believed the homosexual lobby could peacefully coexist with traditional Christian morality. After a very pregnant pause, she responded pointedly: “Sure, if Christians will give up their resistance to our cause.”
Today, in the midst of the inane opposition to the Indiana religious freedom bill, her alarming words prove frighteningly prophetic.
Let’s be clear what we are witnessing. Seeking to harness the power of the state to deny the rights of conscience to those who disagree with you – as the opponents of Senate Bill 101 are surely attempting to do – is a frightening appeal to a 21st century reincarnation of fascism: “Believe like us, think like us, embrace our views or be fined, fired, evicted or punished by the state.”…’
Way to go, you evil assholes. Perhaps you’ll apologise to your peaceful and decent fellow homosexuals when there’s a backlash against you bastards?
Thought not – you’ll just spin it as further proof of “intolerance”.
Like most people, I have no interest whatsoever in the sex lives of others, but I draw the line at having legitimate opinions and choices criminalised in order to force me to pretend that homosexuality is somehow “normal”. It isn’t and I’m damned if the law – any law – is going to stop me saying so.
Of course, we’ll get the usual ugly, abusive trolls as a result of this post. A fine window into the souls of these scumbag activists and their brainless apologists.
Homosexuals are insane…Seriously
Until the 1970s, homosexuals were (rightly, in my humble opinion) deemed insane by most American psychologists.
I see nothing since the 1970s homosexuals have done or said to change my mind.
I’ve known some fine people who were homosexuals, Ronbo. But they weren’t bloody activist zealots.
We will have to agree to disagree about homosexuals – I’ve never met one who was a loyal American.
I’ve known a few who kept to themselves and were otherwise completely normal people.
The rest however are sick,demented,whoring faggots that can’t die from AIDS fast enough.Sorry,it’s been a long week.
https://youtu.be/ZWQVrWdjJcs
Sorry folks, Britain shamefully leads the way, as usual.
Try this:
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/03/27/not-so-free-speech-street-preacher-fined-for-quoting-the-bible-told-to-use-alternative-verses/
The Muslim judge told him which Bible verses he could use when preaching! A Muslim judge who also sits in judgement in Sharia courts in Britain!
If you ever wondered how we would end up with the One World Religion that appears to be prophesied in Revelation, I fear that this is how it starts.
WTF!!! I thought Britain has lost its ability to disgust me, but no. This is a new low.
F–ker needs a 7.62mm brain drain
This is bloody unbelievable. One religion ruling over the rights of another, and backed by British law…? They have just taken a step back into the dark ages and beyond…this is indeed how civil wars start. Britian is no longer great, it is a cesspit of leftist stupidity of its own making. Freedom of speech and civil liberties just took a huge wallop…we will see far more of this to come; this is like Hitler all over again…but okayed by Britian!! upside down world!!!
I agree with every word of that, Lara. Words almost fail, don’t they?
Lara said:
One religion ruling over the rights of another
But that is the expectation that Islam has! It is here to dominate and to rule the world. Its followers are required to fight non-Muslims merely for being non-Muslims, and they may only give up when “the religion is all for allah and their is no kufr”. It is after all a religion of piece.
This is typical government divide and conquer BS.
Notice how you have two sides, both clamoring for government oppression of the other. From the authoritarian perspective it’s “heads I win, tails you lose”.
And we go for it, hook line and sinker.
The question to be asking is “what the bloody hell is the government doing regulating marriage AT ALL?”
If the government passed legislation annulling straight marriages would you turn to your (former) wife and say “oh well, I guess we’re just friends now”? So how can anyone contend that the government has the right to pick and choose which marriages count.
Of course, we never hear the third argument from the MSM of “get government out of marriage entirely” because that would be libertarian, and we can’t have that now, can we?
And whether you think gay people are lunatics or not is entirely irrelevant. In a free society people have the right to be insane provided they are not directly harming anyone else.
Consenting adults ought do what pleases them, however grotesque and cringeworthy others may find it.
“Consenting adults ought do what pleases them, however grotesque and cringeworthy others may find it.”
Concur.
Always provided it doesn’t harm others. And the bar for “harm” needs to be set a bloody sight higher than merely offended.
“Hurt feelings” don’t count, and “the right to feel safe” can go jump off of a bridge”.
If all the world turns homosexual no more humans. I once read that a rectum was not the appropriate receptacle for sperm.
Having said that, I don’t hate gays and have worked with a few both male and female. I think that maybe the homosexual community needs to know that they are seen as humans with rights and that all the other layers go on top like orientation, race, religion or not, political leanings etc.
I remember having an argument with my mother in the 1980s before the advent of the Homosexual Law Reform bill. My mother believed that homos could be cured, so I said to her “OK, so would you be all right if someone from the gay community said to you that you have to be a lesbian from tomorrow onwards?”
I hope that the HLRB has spared women the misery of betrayal and exposure to AIDS so that men can say they are gay and not use a woman to appear respectable or endanger her life from going out on the down-low. Ten years ago a school mate found after three children her husband came out – what a prick – she looked like she’d been kicked in the solar plexus. He now lives with his lover in Christchurch and she just looks hollowed out.
Our problems begin when we set out to protect people not from each other but from themselves.
Goodbye resources. Goodbye productivity. Goodbye rights. Goodbye freedom.
Yep.
Reminds me of a conversation I had with a dingy college girl a few years back.She said she was in favor of gay marriage,so I told her I was in favor of Polygamy.
First she asked what was that?
Then after I explained it she said “oh no,that;s just wrong!”
To which I asked why?”But,but,but….” No buts honey,polygamy in it’s traditional form is heterosexual and monogamous which God almighty is fine with.Two dudes sword fighting under the sheets is the one he sees as a no no.
She didn’t seem to have a response for that one
“If all the world turns homosexual no more humans.”
True enough, but it ain’t going to happen, G P. What is happening is that homosexual couples are adopting children, which is madness and a recipe for a lot of fucked-up kids.
A child isn’t a bloody fashion accessory.
That and the activists are using their new found “rights” to trample the rights of others,as in the alleged cases of discrimination and law suits filed against bakeries who refused to make gay wedding cakes.
Again, this is the hook that baits us.
When you are free to associate and disassociate as you please, the baker can tell the gays to fuck off and the guy down the street gets their business instead. Simple. No need of a law.
“No need of a law? We can’t have that”, Says government man!
“We can have these people at each others throats (and therefore not ours) in just this way.
Create a license for marriage and laws to govern how said license affects said couple, then when discrimination inevitably occurs we can parade an endless argument over who gets to hold the license and who does not. Viola!”
Decades later we’re still chasing each others tails like bloody idiots.
“What is happening is that homosexual couples are adopting children, which is madness and a recipe for a lot of fucked-up kids.
A child isn’t a bloody fashion accessory.”
Agreed KG – especially the fashion accessory part. People like Elton John seem to have exhausted most of life’s pleasures with their profligate ways. I support Dolce and Gabbana because even they can see the value of the traditional family – it takes a man and a woman to breed.
In any event, I’ll bet Elton John’s kids will be handed over to the care of nannies most of the time so Elton doesn’t end up getting sick on his shoulder or poop on his sleeve.