A well indoctrinated surrender-bot:

11 Responses to A well indoctrinated surrender-bot:

1. KG says:

   November 21, 2015 at 19:16

   Why the West was lost
   http://coldfury.com/2015/11/18/why-the-west-was-lost/
2. KG says:

   November 21, 2015 at 19:23

   Not “generous” at all – it was cheap propaganda:
   ‘Boy who donated savings to mosque vandalised after Paris attacks receives generous thank you
   Jack Swanson was sent an iPad in the post, in a parcel from “the American Muslim Community”..’
3. Ronbo says:

   November 22, 2015 at 01:10

   Please excuse me, everyone, I have to puke after reading the latest PC crap.
4. The Gantt Guy says:

   November 22, 2015 at 08:35

   If the muzrats accept this money, it proves (yet again) what a pack of hypocritical assholes they are. After all, the money’s been inside a PIG!!! How can it possibly not be haram?
   • andy5759 says:

     November 22, 2015 at 10:17

     Ha ha, well spotted.
5. KG says:

   November 22, 2015 at 08:44

   Daniel Greenfield:
   ‘..The fulfillment of Islam depends on the subjugation of non-Muslims so that violence against non-Muslims become the essence of religion.

   When Hamas states that, “Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah” or the ISIS rapists tell Yazidi girls that rape “draws them closer to Allah”, they really do mean it.

   They are not perverting a great religion, as our politicians claim, they are living it…’

   http://sultanknish.blogspot.com.au/2015/11/why-islam-is-religion-of-war.html

   Ya think that message will ever get through to the appeaseniks?
   • The Gantt Guy says:

     November 22, 2015 at 08:56

     Rhetorical question?
     • KG says:

       November 22, 2015 at 11:36

       
6. KG says:

   November 22, 2015 at 08:45

   Obama’s FBI:
   “The 2012 FBI directive to remove religious and political motivations from investigations and screening came at a time when the Obama administration was busy purging anything they believed might reflect poorly on Muslims, regardless of how it effected our national security,” national security consultant David Reaboi told The Daily Caller.
   Reaboi explained, “Since then — and now, presumably, in screening refugees, investigators are trained not to ask about all the key identifiers that would allow them to spot Islamic terrorists or other Islamists who want to do harm to America. Because ISIS, al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood understand themselves in precisely those ways, they’re prevented from asking anything meaningful beyond, ‘are you a terrorist?’”
   “‘Are you a member of the Muslim Brotherhood? What school of Islamic law do you follow? Where do you go to mosque? Do you believe someone who insults Islam deserves to be killed? Would you like to make America an Islamic country?’ All of these questions — the most important ones — are off-limits,” Reaboi said.
7. Mathew says:

   November 22, 2015 at 16:52

   You know the west has lost when after a Paris style massacre (and there have been so many), the first people to defend islam are not muslims; they take their sweet time to issue their grievance list, it’s western idiots who are the first to jump and shriek – nobody touch the muslims!

   It’s not longer that the many westerners have lost, they don’t deserve to survive.
   • KG says:

     November 22, 2015 at 16:55

     Exactly, Mathew.