How’s that “Diversity” working out for you now?

Bwhahahahahaha…….

https://news.yahoo.com/liberals-starting-see-downside-multiculturalism-060000839.html

“Back in 2015, Hamtramck in Michigan became the first American city to elect a Muslim-majority council. Naturally, liberals celebrated this milestone for multiculturalism, while leading media outlets hailed it as a triumphant success. “Residents in Hamtramck from different religious and cultural backgrounds coexist in harmony,” beamed the BBC.

Sadly, however, this verdict may now need to be reconsidered. Because Hamtramck’s Muslim council has just voted to ban Pride flags: the rainbow-coloured symbols of the LGBT community.”

The fun continues-

“Sadly, however, this verdict may now need to be reconsidered. Because Hamtramck’s Muslim council has just voted to ban Pride flags: the rainbow-coloured symbols of the LGBT community.

For the Guardian – which had previously run articles hailing Hamtramck’s “multicultural populace” – this development appears to have come as a terrible shock. Local liberals, it reported at the weekend, had initially welcomed the election of the Muslim council as “a meaningful rebuke” of Donald Trump and his “Islamophobic rhetoric”. Yet now they could only look on “in dismay” as “Muslim residents packing city hall erupted in cheers after the council’s unanimous vote”.

Karen Majewski, a former mayor of the city, said there was “a sense of betrayal”. Frankly, I suspect that what local liberals are mostly feeling is bewilderment. After all, if a Christian council had banned the Pride flag, liberals would have known exactly how to respond. Denounce the council for its queerphobic bigotry, and lead a furious protest march against heteronormative, patriarchal white supremacy. Simple.

Unfortunately, though, this council isn’t Christian. As a result, American liberals are being forced to contemplate an awkward dilemma. Their whole purpose in life is to defend marginalised minorities. But what should they do when one marginalised minority marginalises another marginalised minority? Whose side should they take?”

“Logically it should be the side of the minority being marginalised. Which in this case is people who are LGBT. But if liberals fight the ban on the Pride flag, the Muslim council could accuse them of marginalising Muslims, by refusing to respect their democratic decisions. Liberals, they could add, are guilty of cultural imperialism, by forcing Muslims to conform to certain values. They could even accuse them of Islamophobia. A thought to strike terror into every progressive heart.

These poor liberals. They spend their lives righteously defending minorities from conservatives – not realising that minorities can be conservative themselves.”

The comments section under the article is an absolute slaughter house for libtard sacred cows as well. The only question I have is $15 or $20? How much should we charge to scrape Coexist bumper stickers off a Prius?