David Cameron’s speech about the radicalisation of young muslims in Britain caused howls of outrage from the expected quarters–but could those howls be carefully orchestrated in order to give the impression that he really intends to tackle the cause of the problem? Because he argued that only by giving young, alienated British Muslims a British identity that they’d sign up to would the rest of Britain be safe. This is what he said:
“We have failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong.”
To Wabbit’s big ears this sound a lot like tailoring society to suit muslims, not the other way round. To state the obvious… a British identity and a British society already exists, and this is what they reject. Cameron proposes changing that society. In other words, continuing the work his socialist predecessors undertook.
And odd, isn’t it, how there never needed to be any talk about providing a “vision of society” to which Jews, Hindus. Sikhs, Buddhists felt they wanted to belong? Make no mistake, Cameron’s words are a coded declaration of surrender, not war.
UPDATE:
Cameron also said this: “…it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.” source
