That elephant again:

‘SYDNEY is under siege from gangs of heavily armed robbers terrorising shopkeepers, pub staff and residents.
Meat cleavers, machetes, sawn-off shotguns and axes are among the weapons used in recent weeks as thugs smashed their way into so-called “soft targets” – mostly service stations, bottle shops and licensed premises – demanding cash, wallets, jewellery and mobile phones…’
Nowhere in the article does it mention the ethnicity of the majority of the gangs. And the police are at pains to play down the problem–just as they would be if it was gangs of Scottish Presbyterians, of course…

‘Internet warning over Turangi attack accused

A senior law professor is warning websites and Facebook users they must not publish the name of the teenager accused in connection with the Turangi attack on a five-year-old girl.
….The Government was looking at how to regulate the internet, and its approach with suppression was to realise it was not possible to get rid of everything.
….With Youth Court the general concept was that young people had to be given as much opportunity as possible to turn their lives around, Cheer said.’
CR will not name the accused. But the moment the accused becomes the convicted (if he does) we sure as hell will name him. You may bet on it. What’s with the “turn their lives around” crap? This feelgood idea is gambling with other people’s safety, with no personal consequences if they get it wrong. What’s more, the victims of these pigs don’t get the opportunity to turn their lives around. The chances of this piece of shit ever becoming a useful human are vanishingly small and in any case, society is entitled to exact vengeance for the enormous harm done. The scope and scale of that vengeance shouldn’t be solely the “right” of lawyers and effing bureaucrats to decide–that road has already brought us to where we are today.
Interesting comment she makes, too, about “the government is looking at how to regulate the internet”.
I bet the bastards are.

Hamas now decides just how much free speech you’re allowed:

“WordPress.com Dhimmis Bow to Their Islamic Masters Take Down ‘Bare Naked Islam’ Blog.”
..the Hamas-linked Council on American Islamic Relations launched a successful campaign to have WordPress censor Bare Naked Islam as a “hate site.”
More
The islamoslime have been very successful in getting anti-islam YouTube clips removed and now they’re attacking “anti-islam” blogs. That is, blogs which tell the truth about them. They’ve been able to do this only because a) companies are too fucking cowardly to stand up to them and b) because we’re too apathetic and/or disorganised to retaliate using the same weapons they employ. It’s time to get off our asses and organise some real resistance to this censorship by barbarians and cowards, before it’s too late. Two weapons spring to mind: organised boycotts of companies which cave in to the terrorists and massive complaints to the service providers which host any islam-friendly sites. Any other ideas?

That’ll teach ’em not to mess with the NZ Police!

‘..The officers – a man and a woman – arrived at the rural Glen Afton property about 1.30am and were set upon by four people, understood to all be relatives. A woman ripped clumps of hair from the scalp of the policewoman, who also suffered a blow to the head.
Two attackers were pepper sprayed and police trained a taser on one of them as a warning…’                           source

Horsecrap!

An editorial in the U.K. Telegraph.
‘America must act to prevent Iraqi civil war
The first line begins: ‘If the Arab Spring has raised the banner of enlightened reform across the Middle East…’
Whaat? It did no such damn thing! What it did (and is doing) is substitute dictators of one stripe for dictators of another..the radical islamists.
How in hell can a major newspaper get it so wrong?
As for Iraq, if the various Arab sects refuse to learn to get along together then we should simply arm both sides to the teeth and leave them to sort it out. Then buy oil from the last man standing. What makes it the responsibility of the West, to prevent a bunch of primitives killing one another? Enough blood and treasure has been wasted on this.

Wedding??

Excuse me while I go and throw up.
Insulting, homosexual, attention-seekers–a wedding is between a man and a woman and anything else is a sham and an insult to married couples. To put this celebration of deviant behaviour on the front page is a perfect illustration of the degenerate and degraded state of our culture.
Perhaps they’ll hold this parody at one of their local beats?
UPDATE:  Well well! The item has been moved from the front page and in the same place there is now an item about a man and a woman getting married!  The above link has been changed so it points to the original report. Thanks to Adolf for the tip.